Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a martingale for which \(Y=\sup _{n}\left|X_{n+1}-X_{n}\right|\) has a finite mean. Let \(A_{1}\) be the event that \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) converges and \(A_{2}\) the event that \(\lim \sup X_{n}=+\infty\) and \(\lim \inf X_{n}=-\infty .\) Show that \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{1}\right\\}+\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{2}\right\\}=1\). In words, \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) either converges, or oscillates very greatly indeed.

Short Answer

Expert verified
By using the properties of martingales and the given conditions for Y, we derived inequalities relating the conditional expectations of \(X_n\) with the limsup of the absolute differences between consecutive terms, D_n. After adding the inequalities and using the additivity of conditional expectations, we showed that the expectation of \(|X_n|\) is less than or equal to the expectation of Y. Therefore, the sum of probabilities of events \(A_1\) and \(A_2\) must be equal to 1. This implies that the martingale \(\left\\{X_n\right\\}\) either converges (event \(A_1\)) or oscillates greatly (event \(A_2\)).

Step by step solution

01

Rewrite the given events in terms of limsup and liminf

: First, let's rewrite the given events in terms of limsup and liminf: \(A_{1}\) can be rewritten as \(\lim \sup X_{n} = \lim \inf X_{n}\). \(A_{2}\) can be rewritten as \(\lim \sup X_{n} = +\infty \) and \(\lim \inf X_{n} = -\infty\). Now, our goal is to show that \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{1}\right\\}+\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{2}\right\\}=1\).
02

Define the limsup and liminf of absolute differences

: Let's define the limsup and liminf of the sequence of absolute differences between consecutive terms: \(D_{n} = \vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert \), then, \(\lim \sup D_{n} = \lim \sup (\vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert) \). \(\lim \inf D_{n} = \lim \inf (\vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert) \).
03

Use the given conditions of the martingale and Y to derive inequalities

: We know that Y is the finite mean of the absolute differences between consecutive terms, i.e., \(E[Y] < \infty\), where \(Y = \sup_n \vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert\). Since \(Y \geq \lim \sup D_{n}\), we can write: \(E[Y] \geq E[\lim \sup D_{n}] \). Now, we will use the following inequality for conditional expectations of martingales. For any martingale \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) and any event A: \( E[ \vert X_{n} \vert ; A] \leq E[\lim \inf \vert X_{n} \vert ; A]\). Applying the above inequality to events \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{2}\), we get: \( E[ \vert X_{n} \vert ; A_{1}] \leq E[\lim \inf \vert X_{n} \vert ; A_{1}]\) \( E[ \vert X_{n} \vert ; A_{2}] \leq E[\lim \inf (\vert X_{n+1} \vert + \vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert) ; A_{2}]\)
04

Adding the inequalities derived earlier and using the additivity of conditional expectations

: Adding the inequalities derived in Step 3, we obtain: \(E[\vert X_{n} \vert ; A_{1}] + E[\vert X_{n} \vert ; A_{2}] \leq E[\lim \inf \vert X_{n} \vert ; A_{1}] + E[\lim \inf (\vert X_{n+1} \vert + \vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert) ; A_{2}]\). Using the additivity of conditional expectations, this can be rewritten as: \(E[\vert X_{n} \vert] \leq E[\lim \sup D_{n}]\).
05

Showing that sum of probabilities of events A1 and A2 is equal to 1

: Due to step 4, we have: \(E[\vert X_{n} \vert] \leq E[\lim \sup D_{n}]\). We know that: \(E[Y] \geq E[\lim \sup D_{n}]\). Hence, \(E[\vert X_{n} \vert] \leq E[Y]\). Using the probability-conditioned expectation relationship, we obtain: \(E[\vert X_{n} \vert] = \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{1}\right\\}E[\vert X_{n} \vert;A_{1}] + \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{2}\right\\}E[\vert X_{n} \vert;A_{2}]\). And, \(E[Y] \geq \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{1}\right\\}E[\lim \inf \vert X_{n} \vert; A_{1}] + \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{2}\right\\}E[\lim \inf (\vert X_{n+1} \vert + \vert X_{n+1} - X_{n} \vert) ; A_{2}]\). Therefore, we can conclude that: \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{1}\right\\} + \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{2}\right\\} = 1\). This confirms that the martingale \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) either converges (event \(A_{1}\)) or oscillates greatly (event \(A_{2}\)).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X\) be a random variable for which $$ \operatorname{Pr}\\{-\varepsilon \leq X \leq+\varepsilon\\}=1 $$ and $$ E[X] \leq-\rho \varepsilon $$ where \(\varepsilon>0\) and \(\rho>0\) are given. Show that $$ E\left[e^{\lambda X}\right] \leq 1 $$ for \(\lambda=\varepsilon^{-1} \log [(1+\rho) /(1-\rho)]\). Apply the result of Problem 17 to bound $$ \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\sup _{n \geq 0}\left(x+S_{n}\right)>l\right\\}, \quad \text { for } \quad x

Prove: If \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) is a nonnegative supermartingale, then $$ \lambda \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\max _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k} \geq \lambda\right\\} \leq E\left[X_{0}\right], \quad \lambda>0 $$

Let \(\left\\{Y_{n}\right\\}\) be a nonnegative submartingale and suppose \(b_{n}\) is a nonincreasing sequence of positive numbers. Suppose \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(b_{n}-b_{n+1}\right) E\left[Y_{n}\right]<\infty .\) Prove that $$ \lambda \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\sup _{k \geq 1} b_{k} Y_{k}>\lambda\right\\}<\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(b_{k}-b_{k+1}\right) E\left[Y_{k}\right] $$

Suppose \(\mathscr{B}\) is the \(\sigma\)-field generated by some random variable \(Y\) (having, then, at most a denumerable number of possible values). Show that a random variable \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if and only if \(X=f(Y)\) for some real-valued function \(f\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free