Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots\) be independent identically distributed positive rando?n variables having finite mean \(\mu\). For fixed \(0<\beta<1\), let \(a\) be the smallest value \(u\) for which \(u \geq \beta E\left[u \vee Y_{1}\right]=\beta E\left[\max \left\\{u, Y_{1}\right\\}\right]\). Set \(f(x)=a \vee x\). Show that \(\left\\{\beta^{\prime \prime} f\left(M_{n}\right)\right\\}\) is a nonegative supermartingale, where \(M_{n}=\max \left\\{Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\right\\}\) whence \(a=f(0) \geq E\left[\beta^{T} f\left(M_{T}\right)\right]\) for all Markov times \(T\). Finally establish that \(a=E\left[\beta^{T} M_{T *}\right]\) for \(T^{*}=\min \left\\{n \geq 1: Y_{n} \geq a\right\\} .\) Thus, \(T^{*}\) maximizes \(E\left[\beta^{T} M_{T} \mid\right.\) over all Markov times \(T\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, we have shown that \(\left\{\beta^n f(M_n)\right\}\) is a non-negative supermartingale and established that \(a \geq E\left[\beta^T f(M_T)\right]\) for all Markov times \(T\). Lastly, we have proved that \(a = E\left[\beta^{T^*} M_{T^*}\right]\) specifically for the Markov time \(T^*\), which maximizes \(E\left[\beta^T M_T\right]\) over all Markov times \(T\).

Step by step solution

01

1. Define Functions and Concepts

Define the function \(f(x) = a \vee x\), where \(a\) is the minimum value \(u\) such that \(u \geq \beta E[u \vee Y_1] = \beta E[\max\{u, Y_1\}]\). Define \(M_n = \max\{Y_1, \ldots, Y_n\}\) as the maximum value of the first \(n\) observations in the sequence. A non-negative supermartingale is a stochastic process \(\{X_n\}\) such that \(E[X_{n+1}\mid X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n] \leq X_n\) and \(X_n \geq 0\) for all non-negative integer \(n\). Define the Markov time \(T^*\) as the first time when the random variable \(Y_n\) reaches or exceeds \(a\): \(T^* = \min\{n \geq 1: Y_n \geq a\}\).
02

2. Prove that \(\left\{\beta^n f(M_n)\right\}\) is a Non-negative Supermartingale

To show that \(\left\{\beta^n f(M_n)\right\}\) is a non-negative supermartingale, we must prove that: 1. \(E[\beta^{n+1}f(M_{n+1})\mid Y_1, \ldots Y_n] \leq \beta^n f(M_n)\) 2. \(\beta^n f(M_n) \geq 0\) Now, we have: \(E[\beta^{n+1}f(M_{n+1})\mid Y_1, \ldots Y_n] = \beta^{n+1}E[f(M_n \vee Y_{n+1})\mid Y_1, \ldots Y_n]\) Since \(Y_i\) are i.i.d., we have \(E[f(M_n \vee Y_{n+1})\mid Y_1, \ldots Y_n] = E[f(M_n \vee Y_1)]\). Since \(\beta a \leq \beta f(Y_1)\), by definition of \(a\): \(E[\beta^{n+1} f(M_{n+1})\mid Y_1, \ldots Y_n] \leq \beta^{n+1} E[f(M_n \vee Y_1)] \leq \beta^n f(M_n)\) Since \(f(x) = a \vee x\) and we know that \(a\) and \(x\) are non-negative, it follows that \(f(x) \geq 0\) for all \(x\). Thus, \(\beta^n f(M_n) \geq 0\). This proves that \(\left\{\beta^n f(M_n)\right\}\) is a non-negative supermartingale.
03

3. Show that \(a \geq E\left[\beta^T f(M_T)\right]\) for all Markov Times \(T\)

Following the properties of non-negative supermartingales: \(E[\beta^T f(M_T)] \leq E\left[\beta^0 f(M_0)\right] = E[f(0)] = a\) This proves that \(a \geq E\left[\beta^T f(M_T)\right]\) for all Markov times \(T\).
04

4. Establish that \(a = E\left[\beta^{T^*} M_{T^*}\right]\) for the Particular Time \(T^*\)

By definition, \(T^* = \min\{n \geq 1: Y_n \geq a\}\). We know that \(a \geq E\left[\beta^T f(M_T)\right]\) for all Markov times \(T\). When \(T=T^*\), \(f(M_{T^*}) = M_{T^*}\), since \(f(x) = a \vee x\). So, \(a \geq E\left[\beta^{T^*} M_{T^*}\right]\). However, since \(M_{T^*} \geq a\) for all \(T^*\): \(E\left[\beta^{T^*} M_{T^*}\right] \geq E\left[\beta^{T^*} a\right] = a E[\beta^{T^*}]\) Using both inequalities, we get: \(a \geq E\left[\beta^{T^*} M_{T^*}\right] \geq a E[\beta^{T^*}]\) Divide both sides by \(a\), we have: \(1 \geq E[\beta^{T^*}]\) Since \(0 < \beta < 1\), it must be the case that \(a = E\left[\beta^{T^*} M_{T^*}\right]\). Finally, since \(T^*\) is the first time when the random variable \(Y_n\) reaches or exceeds \(a\), it follows that \(T^*\) maximizes \(E\left[\beta^T M_T\right]\) over all Markov times \(T\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\left\\{U_{n}\right\\}\) and \(\left\\{V_{A}\right\\}\) be martingales with respect to the same process \(\left\\{Y_{n}\right\\}\). Suppose \(U_{0}=V_{0}=0\) and \(E\left[U_{n}^{2}\right]<\infty, E\left[V_{n}^{2}\right]<\infty\) for all \(n\). Show $$ E\left[U_{n} V_{n}\right]=\sum_{k=1}^{n} E\left[\left(U_{k}-U_{k-1}\right)\left(V_{k}-V_{k-1}\right)\right] $$ As a special case, $$ E\left[U_{n}^{2}\right]=\sum_{k=1}^{n} E\left[\left(U_{k}-U_{k-1}\right)^{2}\right] $$

Prove: if \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) is a submartingale and \(\varphi(x)\) is a convex, increasing function. then \(\left\\{\varphi\left(X_{n}\right)\right\\}\) is a submartingale whenever \(\boldsymbol{E}\left|\varphi^{+}\left(\boldsymbol{X}_{n}\right)\right|<\infty\) for all \(n\) (cf. Lemma 2.2).

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a submartingale. Show that $$ \lambda \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\min _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k}<-\lambda\right\\} \leq E\left[X_{n}^{+}\right]-E\left[X_{0}\right], \quad \lambda>0 $$

10\. Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a martingale for which \(E\left[X_{n}\right]=0\) and \(E\left[X_{n}^{2}\right]<\infty\) for all \(n\). Show that $$ \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\underset{0 \leq k \leq n}{\max } X_{k}>\lambda\right\\} \leq \frac{E\left[X_{n}^{2}\right]}{E\left[X_{n}^{2}\right]+\lambda^{2}}, \quad \lambda>0 $$

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a martingale for which \(Y=\sup _{n}\left|X_{n+1}-X_{n}\right|\) has a finite mean. Let \(A_{1}\) be the event that \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) converges and \(A_{2}\) the event that \(\lim \sup X_{n}=+\infty\) and \(\lim \inf X_{n}=-\infty .\) Show that \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{1}\right\\}+\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{A_{2}\right\\}=1\). In words, \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) either converges, or oscillates very greatly indeed.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free