Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose \(Y\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, and \(E[|Y|]<\infty\). Show that \(E[Y Z] \geq 0\) for all bounded nonnegative \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable random variables \(Z\) implies \(P[\\{\omega: Y(\omega) \geq 0\\}]=1\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
To summarize, the statement \(P[\{\omega: Y(\omega) \geq 0\}]=1\) is proven by analyzing the expected value \(E[Y Z]\) for a specially defined measurable function \(Z\) and observing that it contradicts the given condition \(E[Y Z] \geq 0\) when \(Y(\omega) < 0\). Therefore, the measure of the set \(\omega\) for which \(Y(\omega) < 0\) must be zero, leading to the conclusion of the proof.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Set

Define the set \(A = \{\omega: Y(\omega) < 0\}\). This set contains all elements \(\omega\) for which \(Y(\omega)\) is less than zero.
02

Construct a Bounded Nonnegative Measurable Function

Construct a bounded nonnegative measurable function \(Z\) such that \(Z(\omega) = 1\) if \(\omega \in A\) and \(Z(\omega) = 0\) otherwise, which means that \(Z\) is an indicator function of the set \(A\). Therefore, \(Z\) is a \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable random variable because \(A\) is a Borel set.
03

Evaluate the Expected Value

Now evaluate \(E[Y Z]\). As per the problem statement, \(E[Y Z]\) should be greater than or equal to zero. Since \(Z = 1\) for \(\omega \in A\) and \(Z = 0\) otherwise, \(E[Y Z] = E[Y Z \{\omega: Y(\omega) < 0\}]\). This expression is less than or equal to 0 since \(Y(\omega) < 0\) for \(\omega \in A\). Therefore, we have a contradiction to the statement \(E[Y Z] \geq 0\). This contradiction implies that the measure of the set \(A\) must be zero.
04

Conclude the Proof

Since the measure of set \(A\) is zero, the probability \(P[\{\omega: Y(\omega) < 0\}]=0\). This implies the statement \(P[\{\omega: Y(\omega) \geq 0\}]=1\), completing the proof.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots\) be independent random variables with \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{Y_{k}=+1\right\\}\) \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{Y_{k}=-1\right\\}=1 / 2 .\) Put \(S_{k}=Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{k} .\) Show that $$ \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{S_{k}

Let \(Z, Y_{0}, Y_{1}, \ldots\) be jointly distributed random variables and assume \(E\left[|Z|^{2}\right]<\infty .\) Show that \(X_{n}=E\left[Z \mid Y_{0}, \ldots, Y_{n}\right]\) satisfies the conditions for the martingale mean square convergence theorem.

Suppose \(\mathscr{B}\) is the \(\sigma\)-field generated by some random variable \(Y\) (having, then, at most a denumerable number of possible values). Show that a random variable \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if and only if \(X=f(Y)\) for some real-valued function \(f\).

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a submartingale. Strengthen the maximal inequality, Lemma S.I., to $$ \begin{aligned} \lambda \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\max _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k}>\lambda\right\\} & \leq E\left[X_{n} I\left\\{\max _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k}>\lambda\right\\}\right] \\ & \leq E\left[X_{n}^{+}\right] \leq E\left[\left|X_{n}\right|\right], \quad \lambda>0 \end{aligned} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free