Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose \(X_{1}\) and \(X_{2}\) are \(\mathscr{\text { -measurable random variables. Show that }}\) \(a_{1} X_{1}+a_{2} X_{2}\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable for all real \(a_{1}, a_{2}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, a linear combination \(a_1 X_1 + a_2 X_2\) of two \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable random variables \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) is also \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, as we showed that the pre-image of the linear combination belongs to the sigma algebra \(\mathscr{B}\) for any Borel set and for all possible cases regarding \(a_1\) and \(a_2\).

Step by step solution

01

Define a Function for the Linear Combination

Let's define the function \(Y(\omega) = a_1 X_1(\omega) + a_2 X_2(\omega)\) representing the linear combination of \(X_1\) and \(X_2\).
02

Show that the Pre-Image of the Linear Combination Belongs to the Sigma Algebra

To prove that the linear combination is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, we need to show that for any Borel set \(B \in \mathscr{B}\), the pre-image of the linear combination, \((Y^-1)(B)\), belongs to the sigma algebra generated by \(X_1\) and \(X_2\). Consider an arbitrary Borel set \(B \in \mathscr{B}\). By definition, for \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable random variables \(X_1\) and \(X_2\), the pre-images \((X_1^-1)(B)\) and \((X_2^-1)(B)\) must belong to \(\mathscr{B}\). Now, let's examine the pre-image of the linear combination \((Y^-1)(B)\): $$Y^{-1}(B) = \{\omega \in \Omega : Y(\omega) \in B\} = \{\omega \in \Omega : a_1 X_1(\omega) + a_2 X_2(\omega) \in B\}.$$ We need to show that \((Y^-1)(B)\) belongs to \(\mathscr{B}\).
03

Consider the Case where \(a_1, a_2 \neq 0\)

If both \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) are non-zero, we can rewrite the pre-image as follows: $$Y^{-1}(B) = \{\omega \in \Omega : a_1 X_1(\omega) + a_2 X_2(\omega) \in B\} = \{\omega \in \Omega : X_1(\omega) \in \frac{1}{a_1}(B - a_2 X_2(\omega))\}.$$ Notice that \(\frac{1}{a_1}(B - a_2 X_2(\omega))\) is a Borel set, since it involves the difference and scaling of two Borel sets. Therefore, the pre-image of the linear combination, \((Y^-1)(B)\), can be written as the pre-image of the random variable \(X_1\) evaluated in a Borel set. As \(X_1\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, the pre-image \((Y^-1)(B)\) must also belong to \(\mathscr{B}\).
04

Consider Degenerate Cases

Now let's consider the cases when \(a_1 = 0\) or \(a_2 = 0\) or both. 1. If \(a_1 = 0\) and \(a_2 \neq 0\), then \(Y(\omega) = a_2 X_2(\omega)\). Since \(X_2\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, any scalar multiple of \(X_2\) is also \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable. 2. Similarly, if \(a_2 = 0\) and \(a_1 \neq 0\), \(Y(\omega) = a_1 X_1(\omega)\), and \(Y\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable since \(X_1\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable. 3. If both \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) are \(0\), then \(Y(\omega) = 0\) is a constant function and hence \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable. In each case, \(Y\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable for all real values of \(a_1\) and \(a_2\). In conclusion, \(a_1 X_1 + a_2 X_2\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable for all real \(a_1\) and \(a_2\), as we showed the pre-image of the linear combination belongs to the sigma algebra \(\mathscr{B}\) for any Borel set and for all possible cases regarding \(a_1\) and \(a_2\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Haar functions on \([0,1)\) are defined by $$ \begin{gathered} H_{1}(t)=1 \\ H_{2}(t)= \begin{cases}1, & 0 \leq t<\frac{1}{2}, \\ -1, \quad \frac{1}{2} \leq t<1,\end{cases} \\ H_{2^{n+1}}(t)=\left\\{\begin{array}{cl} 2^{n / 2}, & 0 \leq t<2^{-(n+1)}, \\ -2^{n / 2} & 2^{-(n+1)} \leq t<2^{-n}, \quad n=1,2, \ldots, \\ 0, & \text { otherwise } \end{array}\right. \\ H_{2^{n+}}(t)=H_{2^{n}+1}\left(t-\frac{j-1}{2^{n}}\right) . \quad j=1, \ldots, 2^{n} \end{gathered} $$ It helps to plot the first five. Let \(f(z)\) be an arbitrary function on \([0,1]\) but satisfying $$ \int_{0}^{1}|f(z)| d z<\infty $$ Define \(a_{k}=\int_{0}^{1} f(t) H_{k}(t) d t\). Let \(Z\) be uniformly distributed on \([0,1]\). Show that and $$ f(Z)=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{k} H_{k}(Z) \quad \text { with probability one, } $$ $$ \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{0}^{1}\left|f(t)-\sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{k} H_{k}(t)\right| d t=0 $$

Suppose \(S_{n}=X_{1}+\cdots+X_{n}\) is a zero-mean martingale for which \(E\left[X_{n}^{2}\right]\) \(<\infty\) for all \(n .\) Show that \(S_{n} / b_{n} \rightarrow 0\) with probability one for any monotonic real sequence \(b_{1} \leq \cdots \leq b_{n} \leq b_{n+1} \uparrow \infty\), provided \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} E\left[X_{n}^{2}\right] / b_{n}^{2}<\infty\).

Let \(\xi_{n}\) be nonnegative random variables satisfying $$ E\left[\xi_{n+1} \mid \xi_{1}, \ldots, \xi_{n}\right] \leq \delta_{n}+\xi_{n} $$ where \(\delta_{n} \geq 0\) are constants and \(\Delta=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \delta_{n}<\infty .\) Show that with probability one, \(\xi_{n}\) converges to a finite random variable \(\xi\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty\).

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a martingale satisfying \(E\left[X_{n}^{2}\right] \leq K<\infty\) for all \(n\). Suppose $$ \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sup _{m \sum 1}\left|E\left[X_{n} X_{n+m}\right]-E\left[X_{n}\right] E\left[X_{n+m}\right]\right|=0 $$ Show that \(X=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} X_{n}\) is a constant, i.e., nonrandom.

Suppose \(Y\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, and \(E[|Y|]<\infty\). Show that \(E[Y Z] \geq 0\) for all bounded nonnegative \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable random variables \(Z\) implies \(P[\\{\omega: Y(\omega) \geq 0\\}]=1\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free