Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose \(\mathscr{B}\) is the \(\sigma\)-field generated by some random variable \(Y\) (having, then, at most a denumerable number of possible values). Show that a random variable \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if and only if \(X=f(Y)\) for some real-valued function \(f\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, a random variable \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if and only if \(X=f(Y)\) for some real-valued function \(f\). This is based on showing that if \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, then \(X=f(Y)\), and conversely, if \(X=f(Y)\), then \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable. The proof involves analyzing the properties of the \(\sigma\)-field generated by \(Y\), and verifying that \(X^{-1}(A) \in \mathscr{B}\) for all \(A \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable random variables

A random variable \(X\) is said to be \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if for any set \(A\) in the Borel \(\sigma\)-field \(\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\) (i.e., the smallest \(\sigma\)-field containing all open intervals), its preimage \(X^{-1}(A)\) belongs to \(\mathscr{B}\). In other words, \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if: \[X^{-1}(A) \in \mathscr{B} \, \, \text{for all} \, \, A \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\]
02

Define \(\mathscr{B}\), the \(\sigma\)-field generated by \(Y\)

The \(\sigma\)-field \(\mathscr{B}\) is generated by the random variable \(Y\). It is the smallest \(\sigma\)-field containing all sets of the form \(\{Y \in A\}\), where \(A \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\). Since \(Y\) has at most a denumerable number of possible values, we can write the set of all possible values of \(Y\) as \(\{y_1, y_2, \dots\}\). The sets \(\{Y \in A\}\) are those sets where \(Y\) takes a value from the set \(A\).
03

If \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, show that \(X=f(Y)\) for some function \(f\)

We are given that \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable, which means \(X^{-1}(A) \in \mathscr{B}\) for all \(A \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\). Let \(E\) be any element of \(\mathscr{B}\). Now consider the following set: \[A = \{x \in \mathbb{R} : f(x) \in E\}\] Since \(\mathscr{B}\) is the \(\sigma\)-field generated by \(Y\), there exists a set \(B \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\) such that \(Y^{-1}(B) = E\). Thus, we have: \[X^{-1}(A) = \{Y \in B\}\] Since \(X^{-1}(A) \in \mathscr{B}\), we must have that \(X\) is a function of \(Y\). Specifically, \(X=f(Y)\) for some function \(f\).
04

If \(X=f(Y)\) for some function \(f\), show that \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable

Let \(X=f(Y)\) for some function \(f\). We want to show that \(X^{-1}(A) \in \mathscr{B}\) for all \(A \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\). Let \(A\) be any set in \(\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\). Since \(X=f(Y)\), we have: \[X^{-1}(A) = Y^{-1}(f^{-1}(A))\] Since \(f^{-1}(A)\) is a set in \(\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\), and \(Y\) is a random variable that defines the \(\sigma\)-field \(\mathscr{B}\), it follows that \(Y^{-1}(f^{-1}(A)) \in \mathscr{B}\). Therefore, we have shown that \(X^{-1}(A) \in \mathscr{B}\) for all \(A \in \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\), which means that \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable. In conclusion, we have shown that a random variable \(X\) is \(\mathscr{B}\)-measurable if and only if it is a function of \(Y\). That is, \(X=f(Y)\) for some real-valued function \(f\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a submartingale. Show that $$ \lambda \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\min _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k}<-\lambda\right\\} \leq E\left[X_{n}^{+}\right]-E\left[X_{0}\right], \quad \lambda>0 $$

Let \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots\) be independent random variables with \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{Y_{k}=+1\right\\}\) \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{Y_{k}=-1\right\\}=1 / 2 .\) Put \(S_{k}=Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{k} .\) Show that $$ \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{S_{k}

Prove: if \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) is a submartingale and \(\varphi(x)\) is a convex, increasing function. then \(\left\\{\varphi\left(X_{n}\right)\right\\}\) is a submartingale whenever \(\boldsymbol{E}\left|\varphi^{+}\left(\boldsymbol{X}_{n}\right)\right|<\infty\) for all \(n\) (cf. Lemma 2.2).

Let \(T, Y_{0}, Y_{1}, \ldots\) be random variables. Suppose the possible values for \(T\) are \(\\{0,1, \ldots\\}\) and, for every \(n \geq 0\), the event \(\\{T \geq n\\}\) is determined by \(\left(Y_{0}, \ldots, Y_{n}\right)\). Is \(T\) necessarily a Markov time with respect to \(\left\\{Y_{n}\right\\}\) ? Provide a proof or counterexample to support your claim.

Let \(\left\\{X_{n}\right\\}\) be a submartingale. Strengthen the maximal inequality, Lemma S.I., to $$ \begin{aligned} \lambda \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{\max _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k}>\lambda\right\\} & \leq E\left[X_{n} I\left\\{\max _{0 \leq k \leq n} X_{k}>\lambda\right\\}\right] \\ & \leq E\left[X_{n}^{+}\right] \leq E\left[\left|X_{n}\right|\right], \quad \lambda>0 \end{aligned} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free