Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Every stochastic \(n \times n\) matrix corresponds to a Markov chain for which it is the one-step transition matrix. (By "Stochastie matrix" we mean \(\mathbf{P}=\| P_{y}\) with \(0 \leq P_{i j} \leq 1\) and \(\sum_{j} P_{i j}=1 .\) ) However, not every stochastic \(n \times n\) matrix is the two-step transition matrix of a Markov chain. In particular, show that a \(2 \times 2\) stochastic matrix is the two-step transition matrix of a Markov chain if and only if the sum of its principal diagonal terms is greater than or equal to \(1 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, a \(2 \times 2\) stochastic matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) is the two-step transition matrix of a Markov chain if and only if the sum of its principal diagonal terms is greater than or equal to 1, i.e., \(p+s \geq 1\). We showed this by proving the condition in both directions: (1) If the sum of the diagonal terms is greater than or equal to 1, there exists a matrix \(\mathbf{P}\) that satisfies the required system of equations, and (2) if there exists a matrix \(\mathbf{P}\) satisfying the system of equations, the sum of the diagonal terms of \(\mathbf{A}\) must be greater than or equal to 1.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the condition

We are given a condition: A 2x2 stochastic matrix is the two-step transition matrix of a Markov chain if and only if the sum of its principal diagonal terms is greater than or equal to 1. So, given a 2x2 stochastic matrix of the form: \(\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix} p & q \\ r & s \end{pmatrix}\), we want to find a 2x2 stochastic matrix \(\mathbf{P}\) \(\mathbf{P} = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix}\) such that \(\mathbf{P}^2 = \mathbf{A}\), and show that this is possible if and only if \(p+s \geq 1\).
02

Finding the two-step transition matrix

By definition, a two-step transition matrix is the square of the one-step transition matrix. Hence, we have: \(\mathbf{P}^2 = \mathbf{P} \cdot \mathbf{P} = \begin{pmatrix} a^2 + b \cdot c & a \cdot b + b \cdot d \\ a \cdot c + c \cdot d & c^2 + d \cdot b \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} p & q \\ r & s \end{pmatrix} = \mathbf{A}\) By comparing both sides of the equation, we get the following system of equations: 1. \(a^2 + b \cdot c = p\) 2. \(a \cdot b + b \cdot d = q\) 3. \(a \cdot c + c \cdot d = r\) 4. \(c^2 + d \cdot b = s\)
03

Proving the condition

(1) First, assume that the sum of the diagonal terms of \(\mathbf{A}\) is greater than or equal to 1. That is: \(p + s \geq 1\) Now, we want to show that there exists a matrix \(\mathbf{P}\) such that it satisfies the system of equations from step 2. From the system of equations, we see that: \(p + s = a^2 + b \cdot c + c^2 + d \cdot b\) Since \(p+s \geq 1\), we have: \(a^2 + b \cdot c + c^2 + d \cdot b \geq 1\) By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality: \((a^2 + c^2)(1 + 1) \geq (b \cdot c + d \cdot b)^2\) This shows that there exists a 2x2 stochastic matrix \(\mathbf{P}\) that satisfies the system of equations when \(p+s \geq 1\). (2) Next, let's assume there exists a 2x2 stochastic matrix \(\mathbf{P}\), which satisfies the system of equations. We want to show that the sum of the diagonal terms of \(\mathbf{A}\) is greater than or equal to 1. Using the first and fourth equations from the system of equations: \(p + s = a^2 + b \cdot c + c^2 + d \cdot b\) Since \(\mathbf{P}\) is a stochastic matrix: \(a+c = 1\) and \(b+d = 1\) By squaring these equalities, we get: \((a+c)^2 = a^2 + c^2 + 2 \cdot a \cdot c = 1\) \((b+d)^2 = b^2 + d^2 + 2 \cdot b \cdot d = 1\) Adding the first and second equations, we obtain: \[(p+s) = (a^2 + b \cdot c + c^2 + d \cdot b) \geq (\frac{a^2 + c^2}{2} + \frac{b^2 + d^2}{2}) \geq \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} = 1\] Thus, we've shown that if there exists a matrix \(\mathbf{P}\) such that its square results in \(\mathbf{A}\), then the sum of the principal diagonal terms of \(\mathbf{A}\) must be greater than or equal to 1. Therefore, a 2x2 stochastic matrix is the two-step transition matrix of a Markov chain if and only if the sum of its principal diagonal terms is greater than or equal to 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a random walk on the integers such that \(P_{i, l+1}=p, P_{1, i-1}=q\) for all integer i \((0

Let $$ \mathbf{P}=\left\|\begin{array}{cc} 1-a & a \\ b & 1-b \end{array}\right\|, \quad 0

Suppose 2 distinguishable fair coins are tossed simultaneously and repeatedly. An account of the tallies of heads and tails are recorded. Consider the event \(E_{n}\) that at the \(n\)th toss the cumulative number of heads on both tallies are equal. Relate the event \(E_{n}\) to the recurrence time of a given state for a symmetric random walk on the integers.

Consider a sequence of Bernoulli trials \(X_{1}, X_{2}, X_{3}, \ldots\), where \(X_{n}=1\) or 0 . Assume $$ \operatorname{Pr}\left\\{X_{n}=1 \mid X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n-1}\right\\} \geq \alpha>0, \quad n=1,2, \ldots $$ Prove that (a) \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{X_{n}=1\right.\) for some \(\left.n\right\\}=1\), (b) \(\operatorname{Pr}\left\\{X_{n}=1\right.\) infinitely often \(\\}=1\).

Let \(n_{1}, n_{2}, \ldots, n_{2}\) be positive integers with greatest common divisor \(d\). Show that there exists a positive integer \(M\) such that \(m \geq M\) implies there exist nonnegative integers \(\left\\{c_{j}\right\\}_{j=1}^{k}\) such that $$ m d=\sum_{j=1}^{k} c_{j} n_{j} $$ (This result is needed for Problem 4 below.) Hint: Let \(A=\left\\{n \mid n=c_{1} n_{1}+\cdots+c_{k} n_{k},\left\\{c_{i}\right\\}\right.\) nonnegative integers\\} Let \(B=\left\\{\begin{array}{l}b_{1} n_{1}+\cdots+b_{j} n_{j} \mid n_{1}, n_{2}, \ldots, n_{j} \in A, \text { and } b_{1}, \ldots, b_{j} \\ \text { are positive or negative integers }\end{array}\right\\}\) Let \(d^{\prime}\) be the smallest positive integer in \(B\) and prove that \(d^{\prime}\) is a common divisor of all integers in \(A\). Then show that \(d\) ' is the greatest common divisor of all integers in \(A\). Hence \(d^{\prime}=d\). Rearrange the terms in the representation \(d=a_{1} n_{1}+\cdots+a_{l} n_{i}\) so that the terms with positive coefficients are written first. Thus \(d=N_{1}-N_{2}\) with \(N_{1} \in A\) and \(N_{2} \in A\). Let \(M\) be the positive integer, \(M=N \frac{2}{2} / d\). Every integer \(m \geq M\) can be written as \(m=M+k=N_{2}^{2} / d+k\), \((k=0,1,2, \ldots)\), and \(k=\delta N_{2} / d+b\) where \(0 \leq b

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free