Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the average number of cars abandoned weekly on a certain highway is 2.2. Approximate the probability that there will be

(a) no abandoned cars in the next week;

(b) at least abandoned cars in the next week.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The probability that there will be no abandoned cars in the next week is0.1108.

The probability that there will be at least 2abandoned cars in the next week is0.645.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information (Part-a)

Given in the question that the average number of cars abandoned weekly on a certain highway is2.2. The probability that there will be no abandoned cars in the next week.

02

Solution of the Problem (Part-a)

Given λ=2.2

P(X=0)=e-λ(λ)00!

We get,

=e-2.22.200!

=0.1108.

03

Final Answer (Part-a)

The probability that there will be no abandoned cars in the next week is0.1108.0.1108.

04

Given Information (Part-b)

Given in the question that the average number of cars abandoned weekly on a certain highway is 2.2.The probability that there will be at least 2abandoned cars in the next week.

05

Solution of the Problem (Part-b)

Givenλ=2.2

P(X2)=1-P(X1)

=1-[P(X=0)+P(X=1)]

We get,

=1-[0.1108+0.2438]

=0.645.

06

Final Answer (Part-b)

The probability that there will be at least 2 abandoned cars in the next week is0.645.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When coin 1 is flipped, it lands on heads with probability .4; when coin 2 is flipped, it lands on heads with probability .7. One of these coins is randomly chosen and flipped 10 times.

(a) What is the probability that the coin lands on heads on exactly 7 of the 10 flips?

(b) Given that the first of these 10 flips lands heads, what is the conditional probability that exactly 7 of the 10 flips land on heads?

There are two possible causes for a breakdown of a machine. To check the first possibility would cost C1 dollars, and, if that were the cause of the breakdown, the trouble could be repaired at a cost of R1 dollars. Similarly, there are costs C2 and R2 associated with the second possibility. Let p and 1 − p denote, respectively, the probabilities that the breakdown is caused by the first and second possibilities. Under what conditions on p, Ci, Ri, i = 1, 2, should we check the first possible cause of breakdown and then the second, as opposed to reversing the checking order, so as to minimize the expected cost involved in returning the machine to working order?

The random variable X is said to have the Yule-Simons distribution if

P{X=n}=4n(n+1)(n+2),n1

(a) Show that the preceding is actually a probability mass function. That is, show thatn=1P{X=n}=1

(b) Show that E[X] = 2.

(c) Show that E[X2] = q

Each night different meteorologists give us the probability that it will rain the next day. To judge how well these people predict, we will score each of them as follows: If a meteorologist says that it will rain with probability p, then he or she will receive a score of

1(1p)2if it does rain

1-p2ifitdoesnotrain

We will then keep track of scores over a certain time span and conclude that the meteorologist with the highest average score is the best predictor of weather. Suppose now that a given meteorologist is aware of our scoring mechanism and wants to maximize his or her expected score. If this person truly believes that it will rain tomorrow with probability p*, what value of p should he or she assert so as to maximize the expected score?

Consider n independent sequential trials, each of which is successful with probability p. If there is a total of k successes, show that each of the n!/[k!(n − k)!] possible arrangements of the k successes and n − k failures is equally likely.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free