Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A person tried by a 3-judge panel is declared guilty if at least 2judges cast votes of guilty. Suppose that when the defendant is in fact guilty, each judge will independently vote guilty with probability .7, whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .2. If 70percent of defendants are guilty, compute the conditional probability that judge number 3votes guilty given that

(a) judges 1and 2votes guilty;

(b) judges 1and 2casts 1guilty and 1not guilty vote;

(c) judges 1and 2both cast not guilty votes.

Let Ei,i=1,2,3denote the event that judge i casts a guilty vote. Are these events independent? Are they conditionally independent? Explain

Short Answer

Expert verified

Events Ei are conditionally independent given that the suspect is guilty.

Use Bayes formula in regard to the suspect is, or is not guilty

After calcučating a) and c), b) can be acquired by another Bayes formula, P(E3) being the weighted average of a), b) and c)

a)97142=0.683b)1134=0.324c)45122=0.369

Step by step solution

01

Given Information (part a)

compute the conditional probability that judge number 3 votes guilty given that judges 1 and 2 vote guilty;

02

Explanation (part a)

Events:

G - the suspect is guility

Ei- judgei=1,2,3casts a guilty vote

Probabilities

P(G)=0.7P(Gc)=0.3

P(EiG)=0.7fori{1,2,3}

P(EiGc)=0.2fori{1,2,3}

The eventsE1,E2,E3are independent givenG(orGc)

Otherwise, events E1, E2, E3 are dependent. This can be read from the context of the problem or the fact that the problem is not defined if this is not the case (not all needed probabilities are given).

calculate

a)P(E3E1E2)

b)P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]

c)P(E3E1cE2c)

03

Explanation (part a)

a) Start with the definition

P(E3E1E2)=P(E1E2E3)P(E1E2)

Both probabilities on the right hand side can be calculated using Bayes formula with eventsGandGc

P(E1E2E3)=P(E1E2E3G)P(G)+P(E1E2E3Gc)P(Gc)

P(E1E2)=P(E1E2G)P(G)+P(E1E2Gc)P(Gc)

When conditional independence is applied to this, we obtain

P(E1E2E3)=P(E1G)P(E2G)P(E3G)P(G)+P(E1Gc)P(E2Gc)P(E3Gc)P(Gc)

P(E1E2)=P(E1G)P(E2G)P(G)+P(E1Gc)P(E2Gc)P(Gc)

substituting the known probabilities here the result is:

P(E1E2E3)=0.730.7+0.230.3=0.2425

P(E1E2)=0.720.7+0.220.3=0.355

localid="1648545722244" P(E3E1E2)=97142

=0.683

04

Final Answer (part a)

Judges 1 and 2 vote guilty isP(E3E1E2)=97142=0.683.

05

Given Information (part c)

The conditional probability that, judges 1and2 both cast not guilty votes.

06

Explanation (part c)

The same method as for a)

P(E3E1cE2c)=P(E1cE2cE3)P(E1cE2c)

Bayes formula

P(E1cE2cE3)=P(E1cE2cE3G)P(G)+P(E1cE2cE3Gc)P(Gc)

P(E1cE2c)=P(E1cE2cG)P(G)+P(E1cE2cGc)P(Gc)

Conditional independence givenG(andGc) is applied to this, then, the probabilities are substituted to obtain

P(E1cE2cE3)=(10.7)20.70.7+(10.2)20.20.3=0.0825

P(E1cE2c)=(10.7)20.7+(10.2)20.3=0.255

P(E3E1E2)=1134=0.324localid="1648545962939" P(E3E1E2)=1134=0.3235

07

Final Answer (part c)

The conditional probability that, judges 1and2 both cast not guilty votes.
localid="1648545996450" P(E3E1E2)=1134=0.3235

08

Given Information (part b)

Judges 1and 2cast 1 guilty and 1 not guilty vote;

09

Explanation (part b)

There are many Bayes formulae for calculatingP(E3), two of them are:

P(E3)=P(E3G)P(G)+P(E3Gc)P(Gc)=0.72+0.20.3=0.55

P(E3)=P(E3E1E2)P(E1E2)+P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]P(E1E2cE1cE2)+P(E3E1cE2c)

Conclusion is to equate right hand side in the second equation withP(E3)=0.55

If we first note thatE1E2,E1cE2candE1E2cE1cE2are mutually exclusive, and their union is the whole space, from axiom3

P(E1E2)+P(E1cE2c)+P(E1E2cE1cE2)=1SubstitutionP(E1E2cE1cE2)=0.61

And:

P(E3E1E2)P(E1E2)=P(E3E1E2)=0.2425

P(E3E1cE2c)P(E1cE2c)=P(E3E1cE2c)=0.0825

Now there is only one unknown in equation (2)

0.55=0.2425+P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]0.61+0.0825

From this ,

localid="1648546032593" P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]=451220.369

10

Final Answer (part b)

The conditional probability that, judges 1and 2cast 1guilty and 1not guilty vote is

localid="1648546061166" P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]=45122=0.369

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An engineering system consisting of n components is said to be a k-out-of-nsystem (kn)if the system functions if and only if at least kof the ncomponents function. Suppose that all components function independently of one another.

(a) If the ith component functions with probabilityPi,i=1,2,3,4, compute the probability that a 2-out-of-4system functions.

(b) Repeat part (a) for a 3-out-of-5
system

Consider3urns. An urn Acontains2white and 4red balls, an urn Bcontains 8white and 4 red balls and urn Ccontains 1white and 3red balls. If 1ball is selected from each urn, what is the probability that the ball chosen from urn Awas white given that exactly 2white balls were selected?

Twelve percent of all U.S. households are in California. A total of 1.3 percent of all U.S. households earn more than \(250,000 per year, while a total of 3.3 percent of all California households earn more than \)250,000 per year

(a) What proportion of all non-California households earn more than \(250,000 per year?

(b) Given that a randomly chosen U.S. household earns more than \)250,000 per year, what is the probability it is a California household

A simplified model for the movement of the price of a stock supposes that on each day the stock’s price either moves up 1unit with probabilitypor moves down 1unit with probability 1p.The changes on different days are assumed to be independent.

(a) What is the probability that after2days the stock will be at its original price?

(b) What is the probability that after 3days the stock’s price will have increased by 1 unit?

(c) Given that after 3days the stock’s price has increased by 1 unit, what is the probability that it went up on the first day?

A red die, a blue die, and a yellow die (all six-sided) are rolled. We are interested in the probability that the number appearing on the blue die is less than that appearing on the yellow die, which is less than that appearing on the red die. That is, with B, Y, and R denoting, respectively, the number appearing on the blue, yellow, and red die, we are interested in P(B<Y<R).

(a) What is the probability that no two of the dice land on the same number?

(b) Given that no two of the dice land on the same number, what is the conditional probability that B<Y<R?

(c) What is P(B<Y<R)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free