Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use Newton's method to solve a discretized version of the differential equation $$ y^{\prime \prime}=-\left(y^{\prime}\right)^{2}-y+\ln x, \quad 1 \leq x \leq 2, y(1)=0, y(2)=\ln 2 $$ The discretization on a uniform mesh, with the notation of Example \(9.3\), can be $$ \frac{y_{i+1}-2 y_{i}+y_{i-1}}{h^{2}}+\left(\frac{y_{i+1}-y_{i-1}}{2 h}\right)^{2}+y_{i}=\ln (i h), \quad i=1,2, \ldots, n $$ The actual solution of this problem is \(y(x)=\ln x .\) Compare your numerical results to the solution \(y(x)\) for \(n=8,16,32\), and 64 . Make observations regarding the convergence behavior of Newton's method in terms of the iterations and the mesh size, as well as the solution error.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: As the mesh size increases, the solution error decreases, and the convergence behavior of Newton's method improves. The increased accuracy can be attributed to the finer mesh resolution capturing more details of the exact solution.

Step by step solution

01

Form the Discretized Differential Equation

The given discretized version of the differential equation is: $$ \frac{y_{i+1}-2 y_{i}+y_{i-1}}{h^{2}}+\left(\frac{y_{i+1}-y_{i-1}}{2 h}\right)^{2}+y_{i}=\ln(i h), \quad i=1,2, \ldots, n $$
02

Set up the Uniform Mesh

For n = 8, 16, 32, and 64, set up the uniform mesh with step size h: $$h = \frac{x_{n+1} - x_{n-n}}{n+1}= \frac{2 - 1}{n+1}$$
03

Apply Newton's Method

Iteratively apply Newton's method for each mesh size and obtain the numerical solution of the discretized equation.
04

Compare Numerical Results with Actual Solution

For each mesh size (n = 8, 16, 32, and 64), compare the obtained numerical solution with the actual solution y(x) = ln(x) at corresponding mesh points. Calculate the error for each value of n.
05

Observe Convergence Behavior and Solution Error

Based on the errors calculated in the previous step, observe the convergence behavior of Newton's method in terms of the iterations and mesh size. Make comments on the solution error and the effect of increasing the mesh size on the accuracy of the numerical solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Differential Equations
Differential equations are mathematical equations that involve functions and their derivatives. They are used to describe various phenomena across mathematics, physics, engineering, and many other fields. The primary goal with differential equations is to find a function that satisfies the equation. In the exercise, we have the differential equation \( y^{\prime \prime} = -\left(y^{\prime}\right)^{2} - y + \ln x \), with boundary conditions \( y(1) = 0 \) and \( y(2) = \ln 2 \).To solve this problem, an analytical solution could be complex or impossible, so numerical methods like Newton's Method are applied. This allows us to approximate solutions when an exact solution isn't feasible.
Discretization
Discretization is a process used to transform continuous differential equations into discrete versions. This is achieved by dividing the domain into a finite number of intervals, known as a mesh. By doing so, we convert our differential equation into a difference equation that can be solved using numerical methods.In the exercise, the discretized version of the differential equation is given as:\[ \frac{y_{i+1}-2 y_{i}+y_{i-1}}{h^{2}} + \left(\frac{y_{i+1}-y_{i-1}}{2h}\right)^{2} + y_{i} = \ln (ih), \quad i=1,2, \ldots, n \]Discretization transforms the continuous problem into a form that can be handled with computers, making it possible to solve complex differential equations numerically.
Numerical Solution
Obtaining a numerical solution involves finding approximate solutions to problems that may not have exact solutions. In this context, Newton's Method is used as an iterative approach to solve the discretized differential equations.

Steps of Newton's Method

  • Start with an initial guess close to the expected solution.
  • Refine this guess iteratively by solving related linear equations.
  • Continue the iteration until the solution converges, i.e., the change between successive approximations becomes negligible.
By choosing different mesh sizes (\( n = 8, 16, 32, \) and \( 64 \)), we observe how well the numerical solution approximates the true solution \( y(x) = \ln x \). Newton's Method helps improve the accuracy of such approximations, especially as we refine our mesh size.
Mesh Size
The mesh size, denoted by \( h \), controls the spacing between points in the discretization of a differential equation. It plays a crucial role in determining the accuracy of the numerical solution. The smaller the mesh size, the more points are used to approximate the differential equation, which typically leads to a more accurate solution.In the exercise, for different values of \( n \) (e.g., 8, 16, 32, and 64),\( h \) is computed as:\[ h = \frac{2 - 1}{n+1} = \frac{1}{n+1} \]As \( n \) increases, \( h \) decreases, leading to better approximations. Observing the convergence behavior and error, we can analyze how decreasing \( h \) results in the numerical solutions being closer to the actual solution \( y(x) = \ln x \). However, smaller mesh sizes also require more computations, highlighting a trade-off between accuracy and computational effort.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the saddle point matrix $$ K=\left(\begin{array}{cc} H & A^{T} \\ A & 0 \end{array}\right) $$ where the matrix \(H\) is symmetric positive semidefinite and the matrix \(A\) has full row rank. (a) Show that \(K\) is nonsingular if \(\mathbf{y}^{T} H \mathbf{y} \neq 0\) for all \(\mathbf{y} \in \operatorname{null}(A), \mathbf{y} \neq \mathbf{0}\). (b) Show by example that \(K\) is symmetric but indefinite, i.e., it has both positive and negative eigenvalues.

An \(n \times n\) linear system of equations \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\) is modified in the following manner: for each \(i, i=1, \ldots, n\), the value \(b_{i}\) on the right-hand side of the \(i\) th equation is replaced by \(b_{i}-x_{i}^{3}\). Obviously, the modified system of equations (for the unknowns \(x_{i}\) ) is now nonlinear. (a) Find the corresponding Jacobian matrix. (b) Given that \(A\) is strictly diagonally dominant with positive elements on its diagonal, state whether or not it is guaranteed that the Jacobian matrix at each iterate is nonsingular. (c) Suppose that \(A\) is symmetric positive definite (not necessarily diagonally dominant) and that Newton's method is applied to solve the nonlinear system. Is it guaranteed to converge?

Show that the function $$ \phi(\mathbf{x})=x_{1}^{2}-x_{2}^{4}+1 $$ has a saddle point at the origin, i.e., the origin is a critical point that is neither a minimum nor ? maximum. What happens if Newton's method is applied to find this saddle point?

(a) Suppose Newton's method is applied to a linear system \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b} .\) How does the iterative formula look and how many iterations does it take to converge? (b) Suppose the Jacobian matrix is singular at the solution of a nonlinear system of equations. Speculate what can occur in terms of convergence and rate of convergence. Specifically, is it possible to have a situation where the Newton iteration converges but convergence is not quadratic?

This exercise is concerned with proofs. Let \(\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x})\) be Lipschitz continuously differentiable in an open convex set \(\mathcal{D} \subset \mathcal{R}^{n}\), i.e., there is a constant \(\gamma \geq 0\) such that $$ \|J(\mathbf{x})-J(\mathbf{y})\| \leq \gamma\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\| \quad \forall \mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y} \in \mathcal{D} $$ where \(J\) is the \(n \times n\) Jacobian matrix of \(\mathbf{f}\). It is possible to show that if \(\mathbf{x}\) and \(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{p}\) are in \(\mathcal{D}\), then $$ \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{p})=\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x})+\int_{0}^{1} J(\mathbf{x}+\tau \mathbf{p}) \mathbf{p} d \tau $$ (a) Assuming the above as given, show that $$ \|\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{p})-\mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x})-J(\mathbf{x}) \mathbf{p}\| \leq \frac{\gamma}{2}\|\mathbf{p}\|^{2} $$ (b) Suppose further that there is a root \(\mathbf{x}^{*} \in \mathcal{D}\) satisfying $$ \mathbf{f}\left(\mathbf{x}^{*}\right)=\mathbf{0}, \quad J\left(\mathbf{x}^{*}\right) \text { nonsingular. } $$ Show that for \(\mathbf{x}_{0}\) sufficiently close to \(\mathbf{x}^{*}\), Newton's method converges quadratically.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free