Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the linear least squares problem of minimizing \(\|\mathbf{b}-A \mathbf{x}\|_{2}\), where \(A\) is an \(m \times n\) \((m>n)\) matrix of \(\operatorname{rank} n .\) (a) Use the SVD to show that \(A^{T} A\) is nonsingular. (b) Given an \(m \times n\) matrix \(A\) that has full column rank, show that \(A\left(A^{T} A\right)^{-1} A^{T}\) is a projector which is also symmetric. Such operators are known as orthogonal projectors. (c) Show the solution of the linear least squares problem satisfies $$ \mathbf{r}=\mathbf{b}-A \mathbf{x}=P \mathbf{b} $$ where \(P\) is an orthogonal projector. Express the projector \(P\) in terms of \(A\). (d) Let \(Q\) and \(R\) be the matrices associated with the QR decomposition of \(A\). Express the matrix \(P\) in terms of \(Q\) and \(R\). Simplify your result as much as possible. (e) With \(\mathbf{r}\) defined as usual as the residual, consider replacing \(\mathbf{b}\) by \(\hat{\mathbf{b}}=\mathbf{b}+\alpha \mathbf{r}\) for some scalar \(\alpha\). Show that we will get the same least squares solution to \(\min _{\mathbf{x}}\|A \mathbf{x}-\hat{\mathbf{b}}\|_{2}\) regardless of the value of \(\alpha\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that \(A^TA\) is nonsingular using SVD and show that the expression \(A(A^TA)^{-1}AT\) is a symmetric projector. Express the residual vector in terms of an orthogonal projector and the matrix A, and express the projector P using the QR decomposition of matrix A. Show that the solution is independent of the parameter \(\alpha\). Answer: Using the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), we find that \(A^TA = V\Sigma^2 V^T\), making it positive definite and nonsingular. The expression \(A(A^TA)^{-1}AT\) is a symmetric projector, as shown by computing its transpose and square. The residual vector \(\mathbf{r} = \mathbf{b} - A\mathbf{x}\) can be expressed as \(P\mathbf{b}\), where \(P = (I - A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T)\) is an orthogonal projector in terms of matrix A. Using the QR decomposition, the matrix P can be expressed as \(P = I - QQ^T\). The least squares solution is independent of the parameter \(\alpha\) since the norm of the residual is proportional to the residual itself and minimization problems only depend on the norm.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Prove that \(A^TA\) is nonsingular using SVD

First, perform singular value decomposition (SVD) on the matrix \(A\). $$ A = U\Sigma V^T $$ Now, let's compute \(A^TA\): $$ A^TA = (U\Sigma V^T)^T(U\Sigma V^T) = V\Sigma^TU^TU\Sigma V^T = V\Sigma^2 V^T $$ Since \(\Sigma\) is a diagonal matrix with positive diagonal elements (singular values) and \(V\) is orthogonal, it follows that \(A^TA\) is positive definite, and hence nonsingular.
02

(b) Show that \(A(A^TA)^{-1}AT\) is a symmetric projector

Let \(P = A(A^T A)^{-1} A^T\). We need to show that \(P\) is symmetric and a projector. First, let's show that \(P\) is symmetric: $$ P^T = (A(A^T A)^{-1} A^T)^T = A((A^T A)^{-1})^T A^T = A(A^TA)^{-1} A^T = P $$ Now, we need to show that \(P\) is a projector. A matrix is a projector if \(P^2 = P\): $$ P^2 = A(A^TA)^{-1}A^TA(A^TA)^{-1}A^T = A(I_n)(A^TA)^{-1}A^T = A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T = P $$ Therefore, we can conclude that \(P\) is a symmetric projector.
03

(c) Express the residual in terms of the orthogonal projector P

Using the property of orthogonal projectors, we have: $$ \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{b} - A\mathbf{x} = (I - A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T)\mathbf{b} = P\mathbf{b} $$ Where \(P = (I - A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T)\) is the orthogonal projector in terms of \(A\).
04

(d) Express matrix P in terms of the QR decomposition of A

Given the QR decomposition of \(A=QR\), we can express \(P\) as follows: $$ P = I - A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T = I - QR(R^TQ^TQR)^{-1}(QR)^T = I - QR(R^TQ^TQR)^{-1}R^TQ^T $$ Now, we know that \(R^TQ^TQ = R^T\), hence: $$ P = I - QR((R^TR)^{-1})R^TQ^T = I - QR(R^{-1}(R^T)^{-1})R^TQ^T = I - QQQ^T = I - QQ^T $$ Therefore, the matrix \(P\) is expressed in terms of the QR decomposition matrices \(Q\) and \(R\).
05

(e) Prove that the solution is independent of the parameter \(\alpha\)

Given that \(\hat{\mathbf{b}} = \mathbf{b}+\alpha\mathbf{r}\), we want to show that \(\min_{\mathbf{x}} \|A\mathbf{x}-\hat{\mathbf{b}}\|_{2}\) is independent of \(\alpha\). The residual of this problem is given by: $$ \hat{\mathbf{r}} = \hat{\mathbf{b}} - A\mathbf{x} = (\mathbf{b}+\alpha\mathbf{r}) - A\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{r} + \alpha\mathbf{r} = (1+\alpha)\mathbf{r} $$ The norm of the residual is proportional to the residual itself since it's a scalar multiple: $$ \|\hat{\mathbf{r}}\|_{2} = |(1+\alpha)|\|\mathbf{r}\|_{2} $$ Since \(|(1+\alpha)|\) is a positive scalar, the minimization problem is equivalent to minimizing \(\|\mathbf{r}\|_{2}\), thus the least squares solution is independent of \(\alpha\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
Singular Value Decomposition, or SVD, is a method to factorize a matrix into three other matrices, defined as \( A = U\Sigma V^T \). This technique is very useful in linear algebra for reasons such as understanding the properties of a matrix or solving linear least squares problems.

Here, \( U \) and \( V \) are orthogonal matrices and \( \Sigma \) is a diagonal matrix containing the singular values of \( A \). The singular values are non-negative and appear in descending order. An important property of SVD is that it can tell us about the rank of the matrix \( A \). Since \( V \) is orthogonal and \( \Sigma \) is diagonal with positive elements, the matrix \( A^TA \) is not only invertible (nonsingular) but also positive definite.

In the context of least squares problems, using SVD can be a stable method for finding solutions even if the data is ill-conditioned or noisy.
QR Decomposition
QR Decomposition is another matrix factorization technique that writes a matrix \( A \) as the product of an orthogonal matrix \( Q \) and an upper triangular matrix \( R \). This is particularly useful in linear least squares and numerical calculations because it makes calculations numerically stable and efficient.

The process of decomposing a matrix into QR components is essential for solving systems of linear equations, particularly those involved in least squares problems. When you have the QR decomposition of a matrix, you can express a lot of matrix operations in simpler forms.

In the exercise, the QR decomposition helped express the orthogonal projector \( P \). By using the properties of orthogonal matrices, it simplifies the projector to \( I - QQ^T \), highlighting that operations on orthogonal matrices require less computational complexity.
Orthogonal Projectors
Orthogonal Projectors are special linear transformations that map vectors onto a subspace, providing the least error possible. The projection matrix, \( P \), is orthogonal because it is both symmetric and idempotent, meaning \( P^2 = P \).
For a given matrix \( A \) with full column rank, the projector is expressed as \( A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T \). Such projectors are extremely useful in linear regression and least squares as they enable the calculation of the best approximate solutions in an efficient way.

In the exercise, we saw that the residual vector, \( \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{b} - A\mathbf{x} \), can be expressed in terms of \( P \). This shows that the projection minimizes the distances from the data points to the subspace, providing an optimal solution to the least squares problems.
Symmetric Matrices
Symmetric matrices are square matrices that are equal to their transpose, \( A = A^T \). This property is significant in many areas of mathematics and engineering. In the context of the linear least squares exercise, symmetric matrices appear naturally in forms like \( A^TA \) and projection matrices like \( P \).

The symmetry ensures that these matrices have real eigenvalues and orthogonal eigenvectors, which simplifies many calculations, including those in numerical linear algebra. Inverting symmetric matrices is easier and often leads to stable numerical computations.

Moreover, symmetric matrices are associated with several important decompositions, like the spectral decomposition, further aiding efficient computation and error minimization in least squares solutions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the least squares problem $$ \min _{\mathbf{x}}\|\mathbf{b}-A \mathbf{x}\|_{2} $$ where we know that \(A\) is ill-conditioned. Consider the regularization approach that replaces the normal equations by the modified, better- conditioned system $$ \left(A^{T} A+\gamma I\right) \mathbf{x}_{\gamma}=A^{T} \mathbf{b} $$ where \(\gamma>0\) is a parameter. (a) Show that \(\kappa_{2}^{2}(A) \geq \kappa_{2}\left(A^{T} A+\gamma I\right)\). (b) Reformulate the equations for \(\mathbf{x}_{\gamma}\) as a linear least squares problem. (c) Show that \(\left\|\mathbf{x}_{\gamma}\right\|_{2} \leq\|\mathbf{x}\|_{2}\). (d) Find a bound for the relative error \(\frac{\left\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}_{y}\right\|_{2}}{\|\mathbf{x}\|_{2}}\) in terms of either the largest or the smallest singular value of the matrix \(A\). State a sufficient condition on the value of \(\gamma\) that would guarantee that the relative error is bounded below a given value \(\varepsilon\). (e) Write a short program to solve the \(5 \times 4\) problem of Example \(8.8\) regularized as above, using MATLAB's backslash command. Try \(\gamma=10^{-j}\) for \(j=0,3,6\), and 12 . For each \(\gamma\), calculate the \(\ell_{2}\) -norms of the residual, \(\left\|B \mathbf{x}_{\gamma}-\mathbf{b}\right\|\), and the solution, \(\left\|\mathbf{x}_{\gamma}\right\|\). Compare to the results for \(\gamma=0\) and to those using SVD as reported in Example \(8.8\). What are your conclusions? (f) For large ill-conditioned least squares problems, what is a potential advantage of the regularization with \(\gamma\) presented here over minimum norm truncated SVD?

Show that the Rayleigh quotient of a real matrix \(A\) and vector \(\mathbf{v}, \mu(\mathbf{v})=\frac{\mathbf{v}^{T} A \mathbf{v}}{\mathbf{v}^{T \mathbf{v}}}\), is the least squares solution of the problem $$ \min _{\mu}\|A \mathbf{v}-\mu \mathbf{v}\|, $$ where \(\mathbf{v}\) is given.

Use the definition of the pseudo-inverse of a matrix \(A\) in terms of its singular values and singular vectors, as given in the discussion on solving linear least squares problems via the SVD, to show that the following relations hold: (a) \(A A^{\dagger} A=A\). (b) \(A^{\dagger} A A^{\dagger}=A^{\dagger}\). (c) \(\left(A A^{\dagger}\right)^{T}=A A^{\dagger}\). (d) \(\left(A^{\dagger} A\right)^{T}=A^{\dagger} A\).

Suggest an efficient way of computing the eigenvalues of $$ M=\left(\begin{array}{ll} A & C \\ B & D \end{array}\right) $$ where \(A \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times k}, B \in \mathbb{R}^{j \times k}, C \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times j}\), and \(D \in \mathbb{R}^{j \times j}\) are given real, diagonal matrices. [Notice that the sizes of the matrices appearing in \(M\) are generally different and they are not all square.]

A column-stochastic matrix \(P\) is a matrix whose entries are nonnegative and whose column sums are all equal to 1 . In practice such matrices are often large and sparse. Let \(E\) be a matrix of the same size as \(P\), say, \(n \times n\), all of whose entries are equal to \(1 / n\), and let \(\alpha\) be a scalar, \(0<\alpha<1\). (a) Show that \(A(\alpha)=\alpha P+(1-\alpha) E\) is also a column-stochastic matrix. (b) What are the largest eigenvalue and corresponding eigenvector of \(A(\alpha)\) ? (c) Show that the second largest eigenvalue of \(A(\alpha)\) is bounded (in absolute value) by \(\alpha\). (d) Suppose the dominant eigenvector of \(A(\alpha)\) is to be computed using the power method. This vector, if normalized so that its \(\ell_{1}\) -norm is equal to 1 , is called the stationary distribution vector. i. Show how matrix-vector products with \(P(\alpha)\) can be performed in an efficient manner in terms of storage. (Assume \(n\) is very large, and recall that \(E\) is dense.) ii. Show that if the power method is applied, then if the initial guess \(\mathbf{v}_{0}\) satisfies \(\left\|\mathbf{v}_{0}\right\|_{1}=1\), then all subsequent iterates \(\mathbf{v}_{k}\) also have a unit \(\ell_{1}\) -norm, and hence there is no need to normalize throughout the iteration. [Warning: Item (d) and even more so item (c) above are significantly tougher nuts to crack than items (a) and (b).]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free