Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the matrix $$ A=\left(\begin{array}{lll} 1 & a & a \\ a & 1 & a \\ a & a & 1 \end{array}\right) $$ Find the values of \(a\) for which \(A\) is symmetric positive definite but the Jacobi iteration does not converge.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The matrix \(A\) is symmetric positive definite but the Jacobi iteration does not converge if \(-\frac{1}{2} \leq a < 0\) or \(0 < a \leq \frac{1}{2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Check for Symmetry

Since \(A\) is given, it is trivial to check its symmetry. By inspection, it is evident that \(A=A^T\) (as all the elements are symmetric w.r.t the main diagonal). So, \(A\) is symmetric.
02

Determine Eigenvalues of A

In order to check if the matrix A is positive definite, we must make sure that all its eigenvalues are positive. To find the eigenvalues, we have to solve the characteristic equation given by $$ \text{det}(\lambda I - A) = 0, $$ which is $$ \text{det}\left(\left(\begin{array}{lll} \lambda -1 & -a & -a \\ -a & \lambda -1 & -a \\ -a & -a & \lambda -1 \\ \end{array}\right)\right) = 0. $$ Now, we calculate the determinant: $$ (\lambda-1)^3 - 2a^2(\lambda -1)-a^3 = 0. $$ Using the cubic formula, we find that the eigenvalues are $$ \lambda_1 = 1-a, \quad \lambda_2 = 1+a, \quad \lambda_3 = 1. $$
03

Check for Positive Definiteness

For \(A\) to be positive definite, all of its eigenvalues must be positive: $$ \lambda_1 > 0 \Rightarrow 1-a>0 \Rightarrow a< 1. $$ $$ \lambda_2 > 0 \Rightarrow 1+a>0 \Rightarrow a> -1. $$ $$ \lambda_3 > 0 \Rightarrow 1>0. $$ So, for \(A\) to be symmetric positive definite, we must have \(-1<a<1\).
04

Check for Diagonal Dominance

A necessary condition for the convergence of the Jacobi iteration is that \(A\) is strictly diagonally dominant. A matrix is strictly diagonally dominant if the absolute value of the diagonal element is strictly greater than the sum of the absolute values of all other elements in the row. So, for \(A\), we must have: $$ |1| > |a| + |a|. $$ However, we wish to find a condition under which Jacobi iteration does not converge. Therefore, \(A\) must not be diagonally dominant: $$ |1| \leq |a| + |a|. $$ Since \(-1 < a < 1\), it follows that \(0 \leq 1-2|a|\), leading to \(|a|\geq \frac{1}{2}\).
05

Determine the Range of Values of \(a\)

From Step 3 and Step 4, we have the following conditions: - For \(A\) to be symmetric positive definite, \(-1<a<1\). - For the Jacobi iteration not to converge, \(|a|\geq \frac{1}{2}\). Combining these conditions, we obtain the range of values for \(a\): $$ -\frac{1}{2} \leq a < 0 $$ or $$ 0<a \leq \frac{1}{2}. $$ Thus, if \(-\frac{1}{2} \leq a < 0\) or \(0<a \leq \frac{1}{2}\), the matrix \(A\) is symmetric positive definite but the Jacobi iteration does not converge.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Symmetric Positive Definite Matrix
In numerical linear algebra, a symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix is a key concept. A matrix is defined as symmetric if it equals its transpose, meaning it mirrors itself across its diagonal. For example, if\[ A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & a & a \ a & 1 & a \ a & a & 1 \end{pmatrix} \]then \( A^T = A \), ensuring symmetry because the values on either side of the diagonal are identical.

To further ensure that a symmetric matrix is positive definite, all its eigenvalues must be greater than zero. This property guarantees no zero or negative eigenvalues, which are linked to stability and meaningful solutions in many applications. In the given exercise, analyzing the matrix's eigenvalues (\(1-a\), \(1+a\), and \(1\)) confirmed that \(-1 < a < 1\) makes \( A \) positive definite as all eigenvalues satisfy the positivity condition.
Eigenvalues
Eigenvalues are pivotal in determining the characteristics of matrices in numerical linear algebra. For a given matrix like\[ A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & a & a \ a & 1 & a \ a & a & 1 \end{pmatrix}, \]eigenvalues solve the characteristic equation \( \text{det}(\lambda I - A) = 0 \). They are critical in understanding the matrix's behavior and properties, such as its stability and transformations.

In the exercise at hand, the eigenvalues found are \( \lambda_1 = 1-a \), \( \lambda_2 = 1+a \), and \( \lambda_3 = 1 \). These eigenvalues help to determine if the matrix is positive definite. Knowing eigenvalues is fundamental since:
  • Their positivity implies positive definiteness, gauging if solutions to systems involving the matrix will be stable.
  • They reveal the nature of the matrix, helping in tasks like diagonalization or determining invertibility.
Jacobi Iteration
The Jacobi iteration is a method used to solve systems of linear equations numerically. It's an iterative algorithm that helps find solutions by making initial guesses and refining them repeatedly.

However, its convergence is not guaranteed for all matrices. Convergence depends significantly on the matrix's properties, such as diagonal dominance. If the matrix isn't strictly diagonally dominant, the Jacobi method might not converge.

Jacobi iteration leverages the idea of breaking a matrix equation into multiple parts, iteratively solving each part until the solution stabilizes or reaches an acceptable approximation. In simpler terms, it tries to "zero in" on a solution over several iterations.

For the provided exercise, the Jacobi iteration's non-convergence aligns with the case where the matrix is not strictly diagonally dominant when \( |a| \geq \frac{1}{2} \).
Diagonal Dominance
Diagonal dominance is a condition of matrices that ensures the success of iterative solutions like Jacobi iteration. It occurs when each diagonal element in a matrix is larger in absolute value than the sum of the absolute values of the other elements in its row. For example, if\[ A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & a & a \ a & 1 & a \ a & a & 1 \end{pmatrix} \],go through each row to check if the diagonal element is greater than the other elements in the row summed.

This means ensuring \( |1| > |a| + |a| \) for all such conditions in the matrix. If a matrix satisfies this condition, methods like Jacobi often converge. However, for the matrix \( A \) in the problem, if \(|a| \geq \frac{1}{2}\), the sum of the non-diagonal terms isn't necessarily less than the diagonal term, leading to potential divergence of the Jacobi iteration. This explains why Jacobi might not converge for certain values of \( a \), particularly \( -\frac{1}{2} \leq a < 0 \) or \(0

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the error bound on \(\left\|\mathbf{e}_{k}\right\|_{A}\) given in the CG Convergence Theorem on page 187 implies that the number of iterations \(k\) required to achieve an error reduction by a constant amount is bounded by \(\sqrt{\kappa(A)}\) times a modest constant. [Hint: Recall the discussion of convergence rate from Section 7.3. Also, by Taylor's expansion we can write $$ \ln (1 \pm \varepsilon) \approx \pm \varepsilon $$ for \(0 \leq \varepsilon \ll 1 .]\)

The smoothing factor \(\mu^{*}\) for a discrete operator is defined as the worst (i.e., smallest) factor by which high frequency components are reduced in a single relaxation step. For the two-dimensional Laplacian we have discussed throughout this chapter and a basic relaxation scheme, this can be stated as follows. Suppose \(e_{0}\) is the error before a relaxation step associated with a stationary iteration matrix \(T\) and \(\mathbf{e}_{1}\) the error after that step, and write $$ \mathbf{e}_{0}=\sum_{l, m=1}^{N} \alpha_{l, m} \mathbf{v}_{l, m} $$ where \(\left\\{\mathbf{v}_{l, m}\right\\}_{l, m=1}^{N}\) are the eigenvectors of the iteration matrix. Then $$ \mathbf{e}_{1}=\sum_{l, m=1}^{N} \alpha_{l, m} \mu_{l, m} \mathbf{v}_{l, m} $$ where \(\left\\{\mu_{l, m}\right\\}_{l, m=1}^{N}\) are eigenvalues of the iteration matrix. The smoothing factor is thus given by $$ \mu^{*}=\max \left\\{\left|\mu_{l, m}\right|: \frac{N+1}{2} \leq l, m \leq N\right\\} $$ (a) Denote the discrete Laplacian by \(A\) and the iteration matrix for damped Jacobi by \(T_{\omega}\). Confirm that the eigenvectors of \(A\) are the same as the eigenvectors of \(T_{\omega}\) for this scheme. (If you have already worked on Exercise 11 , this should be old news.) (b) Show that the optimal \(\omega\) that gives the smallest smoothing factor over \(0 \leq \omega \leq 1\) for the two-dimensional Laplacian is \(\omega^{*}=\frac{4}{5}\), and find the smoothing factor \(\mu^{*}=\mu^{*}\left(\omega^{*}\right)\) in this case. Note: \(\mu^{*}\) should not depend on the mesh size. (c) Show that Jacobi (i.e., the case \(\omega=1\) ) is not an effective smoother.

Write a program that solves the problem described in Exercise 10 , with a right-hand-side vector defined so that the solution is a vector of all \(1 \mathrm{~s}\). For example, for \(\omega=0\) the matrix and right-hand side can be generated by $$ \begin{aligned} &\mathrm{A}=\text { delsq }\left(\text { numgrid }\left(r \mathrm{~S}^{\prime}, \mathrm{N}+2\right)\right) ; \\ &\mathrm{b}=\mathrm{A} \text { *ones }\left(\mathrm{N}^{\wedge} 2,1\right) \end{aligned} $$ Your program will find the numerical solution using the Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, SOR, and CG methods. For CG use the MATLAB command pcg and run it once without preconditioning and once preconditioned with incomplete Cholesky IC(0). For SOR, use the formula for finding the optimal \(\omega^{*}\) and apply the scheme only for this value. As a stopping criterion use \(\left\|\mathbf{r}_{k}\right\| /\left\|\mathbf{r}_{0}\right\|<10^{-6}\). Also, impose an upper bound of 2000 iterations. That is, if a scheme fails to satisfy the accuracy requirement on the relative norm of the residual after 2000 iterations, it should be stopped. For each of the methods, start with a zero initial guess. Your program should print out the following: \- Iteration counts for the five cases (Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, SOR, CG, PCG). \- Plots of the relative residual norms \(\frac{\left\|\mathbf{r}_{k}\right\|}{\mathfrak{b} \|}\) vs. iterations. Use the MATLAB command semilogy for plotting. Use two grids with \(N=31\) and \(N=63\), and repeat your experiments for three values of \(\omega: \omega=0, \omega^{2}=10\), and \(\omega^{2}=1000 .\) Use your conclusions from Exercise 16 to explain the observed differences in speed of convergence.

Consider the saddle point linear system $$ \underbrace{\left(\begin{array}{cc} A & B^{T} \\ B & 0 \end{array}\right)}_{\mathcal{K}}\left(\begin{array}{l} u \\ p \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{l} f \\ g \end{array}\right), $$ where \(A\) is \(n \times n\), symmetric positive definite and \(B\) is \(m \times n\) with \(m

Consider the problem described in Example \(7.1\), where the boundary condition \(u(0, y)=0\) is replaced by $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(0, y)=0 $$ (Example 4.17 considers such a change in one variable, but here life is harder.) Correspondingly, we change the conditions \(u_{0, j}=0, j=1, \ldots, N\), into $$ 4 u_{0, j}-2 u_{1, j}-u_{0, j+1}-u_{0, j-1}=b_{0, j}, \quad 1 \leq j \leq N $$ where still \(u_{0,0}=u_{0, N+1}=0\). You don't need to know for the purposes of this exercise why these new linear relations make sense, only that \(N\) new unknowns and \(N\) new conditions have been introduced. (a) What is the vector of unknowns u now? What is \(\mathbf{b}\) ? What is the dimension of the system? (b) What does \(A\) look like? [Hint: This exercise may not be easy; do it for the case \(N=3\) first!]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free