Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Continuing Exercise 3 : (a) Show that Jacobi's method will converge for this matrix regardless of the starting vector \(\mathbf{x}_{0}\) (b) Now apply two Jacobi iterations for the problem $$ \begin{aligned} &2 x_{1}+5 x_{2}+5 x_{3}=12 \\ &5 x_{1}+2 x_{2}+5 x_{3}=12 \\ &5 x_{1}+5 x_{2}+2 x_{3}=12 \end{aligned} $$ starting from \(\mathbf{x}_{0}=(0,0,0)^{T}\). Does the method appear to converge? Explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Provide the results of two Jacobi iterations starting from the initial vector \(\mathbf{x}_{0}=(0,0,0)^{T}\). Answer: The Jacobi's method does not converge for the given matrix because the spectral radius of the iteration matrix H is greater than 1. When applying two Jacobi iterations starting from the initial vector \(\mathbf{x}_{0}=(0,0,0)^{T}\), we obtain the following results: 1. First iteration: \(\mathbf{x}_{1}=(6, 6, 6)^{T}\) 2. Second iteration: \(\mathbf{x}_{2}=(-\frac{27}{2}, -\frac{27}{2}, -\frac{27}{2})^{T}\) The components of the computed vector \(\mathbf{x}_{2}\) become more negative, indicating that the method does not appear to converge.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Convergence of Jacobi's method

(To show that Jacobi's method will converge for this matrix regardless of the starting vector, we need to check whether the matrix is diagonally dominant, that is, if the absolute value of the diagonal element of each row is greater than the sum of absolute values of other elements in that row. If the matrix is diagonally dominant, the method will converge for any initial vector. The given matrix can be written as a sum of a diagonal matrix (D) and the remaining matrix (R): $$ A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & 5 \\ 5 & 2 & 5 \\ 5 & 5 & 2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 5 & 5 \\ 5 & 0 & 5 \\ 5 & 5 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = D + R $$ Now, we can check for diagonal dominance for each row: $$ |2| > |5| + |5|, |2| > |5| + |5|, |2| > |5| + |5| $$ This condition is false, so we must use another approach to show the convergence of Jacobi's method. Recall the spectral radius (\(\rho\)) and its relation to the convergence of Jacobi's method: The method will converge if the spectral radius of the iteration matrix (\(\rho(H)\)) is less than 1. The iteration matrix H can be found using the following formula: $$ H = -D^{-1} R. $$ Calculating the inverse of the diagonal matrix D and the resulting matrix H: $$ D^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1/2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1/2 \end{pmatrix}, \quad H = - \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 5 & 5 \\ 5 & 0 & 5 \\ 5 & 5 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -5/2 & -5/2 \\ -5/2 & 0 & -5/2 \\ -5/2 & -5/2 & 0 \end{pmatrix}. $$ Computing the eigenvalues of H, we find that $$ \lambda(H) = \{- \frac{5}{2}, 0, \frac{5}{2} \}. $$ Now, we compute the spectral radius of H, $$ \rho(H) = \max\{|\lambda(H)|\} = \frac{5}{2}. $$ Since \(\rho(H) > 1\), the Jacobi's method will not converge for this matrix regardless of the starting vector.
02

(b) Applying two Jacobi iterations

(We now apply two Jacobi iterations to the given problem starting from the initial vector \(\mathbf{x}_{0}=(0,0,0)^{T}\), and then discuss whether the method appears to converge. To do this, we will rewrite the system of linear equations in the canonical form for Jacobi's iterations: $$ x_{1}^{(k+1)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 x_{2}^{(k)}-5 x_{3}^{(k)}), $$ $$ x_{2}^{(k+1)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 x_{1}^{(k)}-5 x_{3}^{(k)}), $$ $$ x_{3}^{(k+1)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 x_{1}^{(k)}-5 x_{2}^{(k)}). $$ Now, we perform the first iteration starting from \(\mathbf{x}_{0}=(0,0,0)^{T}\): $$ x_{1}^{(1)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 \cdot 0-5 \cdot 0)=6, $$ $$ x_{2}^{(1)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 \cdot 0-5 \cdot 0)=6, $$ $$ x_{3}^{(1)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 \cdot 0-5 \cdot 0)=6. $$ We get the result of the first iteration as \(\mathbf{x}_{1}=(6, 6, 6)^{T}\). Now let's perform the second iteration using \(\mathbf{x}_{1}\): $$ x_{1}^{(2)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 \cdot 6-5 \cdot 6)=-\frac{27}{2}, $$ $$ x_{2}^{(2)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 \cdot 6-5 \cdot 6)=-\frac{27}{2}, $$ $$ x_{3}^{(2)}=\frac{1}{2}(12-5 \cdot 6-5 \cdot 6)=-\frac{27}{2}, $$ and, as a result, we obtain \(\mathbf{x}_{2}=(-\frac{27}{2}, -\frac{27}{2}, -\frac{27}{2})^{T}\). We can see that the method does not appear to converge, as the components of the computed vector \(\mathbf{x}_{2}\) become more and more negative, diverging away from their true values. The explanation for this behavior can be found in our conclusion from part (a): since the spectral radius of the iteration matrix H is greater than 1, the Jacobi's method will not converge for this matrix.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Spectral Radius
The spectral radius is a crucial concept in understanding the convergence of iterative methods like Jacobi's method. The term refers to the largest absolute value among the eigenvalues of a matrix. Mathematically, for a given square matrix A with eigenvalues \( \lambda_i \), the spectral radius \( \rho(A) \) is defined as \( \rho(A) = \max_i |\lambda_i| \).

In the context of iterative methods for solving linear systems, the spectral radius helps determine whether an iterative method will converge. Specifically for Jacobi's method, if the spectral radius of the iteration matrix, \( H \), is less than 1, convergence is guaranteed. However, if \( \rho(H) > 1 \), the method will diverge, meaning that as the iterations continue, the solution will not get closer to the true answer.

To calculate the spectral radius in a given problem, one would start by determining the eigenvalues of the iteration matrix and then finding the maximum absolute value among those. In the exercise provided, the eigenvalues of matrix H are \( \{- \frac{5}{2}, 0, \frac{5}{2} \} \) and therefore, the spectral radius is \( \frac{5}{2} \) which indicates that Jacobi's method will not converge for this specific matrix, regardless of the starting vector.
Diagonal Dominance
Diagonal dominance is another key factor that influences the convergence of numerical methods for solving systems of linear equations. A matrix is diagonally dominant if, for each row, the magnitude of the diagonal entry in the row is greater than or equal to the sum of the magnitudes of all the other (non-diagonal) entries in that row.

Mathematically, a matrix \( A \) is said to be diagonally dominant if for every row \( i \) the following condition holds: \( |a_{ii}| \geq \sum_{j eq i} |a_{ij}| \) where \( a_{ii} \) is a diagonal element and \( a_{ij} \) are the off-diagonal elements of \( A \).

Diagonal dominance is a desirable property because it often ensures the convergence of iterative methods such as Jacobi's method, even if the spectral radius criterion is not met. Unfortunately, in our textbook exercise, the given matrix lacks diagonal dominance as the condition \( |2| > |5| + |5| \) doesn't hold for any of the rows, highlighting one potential reason why Jacobi's method fails to converge in this scenario.
Numerical Iterations
Numerical iterations are a fundamental concept in numerical analysis, used for approximating solutions to mathematical problems through a process of iteration. This approach involves generating a sequence of approximations, hoping that the sequence will converge to the actual solution.

In the given exercise, Jacobi's method performs numerical iterations to find the solution to a system of linear equations. It does so by isolating each variable in the equations and then using an initial guess to compute a sequence of increasingly accurate approximations for each variable.

The method requires an initial vector, \( \mathbf{x}_{0} \), and updates it using a specified iteration formula. After each iteration, the updated values become the input for the next round. The convergence of these iterations is closely linked to the properties of the matrix, specifically its spectral radius and diagonal dominance.

However, as shown in the exercise, if the method diverges, the values obtained after each iteration move further away from the solution. The divergence observed in the textbook problem, with the vector components drastically increasing in magnitude, underscores the importance of the convergence criteria—such as having a spectral radius smaller than 1—for the success of numerical iterative methods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the energy norm is indeed a norm when the associated matrix is symmetric positive definite.

Consider the linear system \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\), where \(A\) is a symmetric matrix. Suppose that \(M-N\) is a splitting of \(A\), where \(M\) is symmetric positive definite and \(N\) is symmetric. Show that if \(\lambda_{\min }(M)>\rho(N)\), then the iterative scheme \(M \mathbf{x}_{k+1}=N \mathbf{x}_{k}+\mathbf{b}\) converges to \(\mathbf{x}\) for any initial guess \(\mathbf{x}_{0}\).

\(x\) $$ A=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 \end{array}\right) $$ and suppose we are required to solve \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\). (a) Write down explicitly the iteration matrices corresponding to the Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, and SOR schemes. (b) Find the spectral radius of the Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel iteration matrices and the asymptotic rates of convergence for these two schemes. (c) Plot a graph of the spectral radius of the SOR iteration matrix vs. the relaxation parameter \(\omega\) for \(0 \leq \omega \leq 2\). (d) Find the optimal SOR parameter, \(\omega^{*}\). What is the spectral radius of the corresponding iteration matrix? Approximately how much faster would SOR with \(\omega^{*}\) converge compared to Jacobi?

Consider the Helmholtz equation $$ -\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial y^{2}}\right)-\omega^{2} u=g(x, y) $$ defined in the unit square with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. (a) Suppose this problem is discretized on a uniform grid with step size \(h=1 /(N+1)\) using a five-point scheme as in Example \(7.1\) plus an additional term. Write down the resulting difference method. (b) Call the resulting matrix \(A\). Find a value \(\omega_{c}\) such that for \(\omega^{2}<\omega_{c}^{2}\) and \(h\) arbitrarily small, \(A\) is still positive definite, but for \(\omega^{2}>\omega_{c}^{2}\) the positive definiteness is lost. (c) Solve the problem for \(\omega=1\) and \(\omega=10\) for \(N=2^{7}-1\) using an appropriate preconditioned Krylov subspace method of your choice, or a multigrid method. Use tol = 1.e-6. Verify that the last residual norm is below tol and tell us how many iterations it took to get there.

(a) Write a program for solving the linear least squares problems that arise throughout the iterations of the GMRES method, using Givens rotations, where the matrix is a nonsquare \((k+1) \times k\) upper Hessenberg matrix. Specifically, solve $$ \min _{\mathbf{z}}\left\|\rho e_{1}-H_{k+1, k} \mathbf{z}\right\| $$ Provide a detailed explanation of how this is done in your program, and state what \(Q\) and \(R\) in the associated QR factorization are. (b) Given \(H_{k+1, k}\), suppose we perform a step of the Arnoldi process. As a result, we now have a new upper Hessenberg matrix \(H_{k+2, k+1}\). Describe the relationship between the old and the new upper Hessenberg matrices and explain how this relationship can be used to solve the new least squares problem in an economical fashion. (c) The least squares problems throughout the iterations can be solved using a QR decomposition approach. Show that the upper triangular factor cannot be singular unless \(\mathbf{x}_{k}=\mathbf{x}\), the exact solution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free