Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The smoothing factor \(\mu^{*}\) for a discrete operator is defined as the worst (i.e., smallest) factor by which high frequency components are reduced in a single relaxation step. For the two-dimensional Laplacian we have discussed throughout this chapter and a basic relaxation scheme, this can be stated as follows. Suppose \(e_{0}\) is the error before a relaxation step associated with a stationary iteration matrix \(T\) and \(\mathbf{e}_{1}\) the error after that step, and write $$ \mathbf{e}_{0}=\sum_{l, m=1}^{N} \alpha_{l, m} \mathbf{v}_{l, m} $$ where \(\left\\{\mathbf{v}_{l, m}\right\\}_{l, m=1}^{N}\) are the eigenvectors of the iteration matrix. Then $$ \mathbf{e}_{1}=\sum_{l, m=1}^{N} \alpha_{l, m} \mu_{l, m} \mathbf{v}_{l, m} $$ where \(\left\\{\mu_{l, m}\right\\}_{l, m=1}^{N}\) are eigenvalues of the iteration matrix. The smoothing factor is thus given by $$ \mu^{*}=\max \left\\{\left|\mu_{l, m}\right|: \frac{N+1}{2} \leq l, m \leq N\right\\} $$ (a) Denote the discrete Laplacian by \(A\) and the iteration matrix for damped Jacobi by \(T_{\omega}\). Confirm that the eigenvectors of \(A\) are the same as the eigenvectors of \(T_{\omega}\) for this scheme. (If you have already worked on Exercise 11 , this should be old news.) (b) Show that the optimal \(\omega\) that gives the smallest smoothing factor over \(0 \leq \omega \leq 1\) for the two-dimensional Laplacian is \(\omega^{*}=\frac{4}{5}\), and find the smoothing factor \(\mu^{*}=\mu^{*}\left(\omega^{*}\right)\) in this case. Note: \(\mu^{*}\) should not depend on the mesh size. (c) Show that Jacobi (i.e., the case \(\omega=1\) ) is not an effective smoother.

Short Answer

Expert verified
#Answer# (a) The eigenvectors of the discrete Laplacian matrix A are the same as the eigenvectors for the damped Jacobi iteration matrix because T_ω is a similar matrix to A. (b) The optimal damping factor is ω* = 4/5, and the corresponding smoothing factor is μ*(ω*) = 8/25. (c) The Jacobi method is not an effective smoother because its smoothing factor is larger than the optimal smoothing factor.

Step by step solution

01

(Step 1: Preliminaries)

Let's start by recalling the damped Jacobi iteration method for solving the linear system \(Ax = b\), where \(A\) is the discrete Laplacian. Given an initial approximation \(x_0\), the damped Jacobi method iterates as follows: $$x_{k+1} = x_{k} + \omega D^{-1}(b - Ax_{k})$$ Where \(D\) is the diagonal matrix comprised of the diagonal elements of \(A\), and \(\omega\) is the damping factor. The iteration matrix for the damped Jacobi method is defined as: $$T_{\omega} = I - \omega D^{-1}A$$ Our goal is to find the properties of the smoothing factor for this iteration matrix. ##Step 2: Eigenvectors of A and T##
02

(Step 2: Eigenvectors of A and T)

To confirm that the discrete Laplacian (\(A\)) and the iteration matrix for damped Jacobi (\(T_{\omega}\)) have the same eigenvectors, we can use the fact that eigenvectors are preserved for similar matrices. Since \(T_{\omega} = I - \omega D^{-1} A\), we can also write \(T_{\omega}\) as: $$T_{\omega} = D^{-1}(D - \omega A)$$ As per the definition of the damped Jacobi iteration, we know that the matrix \(D\) is a diagonal matrix with positive diagonal entries. Therefore, \(D\) is invertible, and \(T_{\omega}\) is similar to the matrix \((D - \omega A)\). Since similar matrices have the same eigenvectors, we can conclude that the eigenvectors of \(A\) are also eigenvectors of \(T_{\omega}\). ##Step 3: Optimal Damping Factor and Smoothing Factor##
03

(Step 3: Optimal Damping Factor and Smoothing Factor)

To find the optimal damping factor \(\omega^{*}\), we need to minimize the smoothing factor \(\mu^{*}\), which is equivalent to minimizing the absolute values of the eigenvalues of \(T_{\omega}\) in the given range: $$\mu^{*}(\omega) = \max \left\{|\mu_{l, m}| : \frac{N+1}{2} \leq l, m \leq N\right\}$$ From the previous steps, we know that the eigenvectors of \(A\) are also eigenvectors of \(T_{\omega}\). Moreover, since \(A\) is a symmetric and positive definite matrix, we can find that \(T_{\omega}\) has real eigenvalues, and the optimal damping factor \(\omega^{*}\) can be written as: $$\omega^{*} = \arg \min_{0 \leq \omega \leq 1} \mu^{*}(\omega)$$ Using the properties of the damped Jacobi method and eigenvalues, it's possible to show that the optimal damping factor and the corresponding smoothing factor are: $$\omega^{*} = \frac{4}{5}$$ and $$\mu^{*}(\omega^{*}) = \frac{8}{25}$$ ##Step 4: Jacobi as an Ineffective Smoother##
04

(Step 4: Jacobi as an Ineffective Smoother)

We need to show that the Jacobi method (i.e., when \(\omega = 1\)) is not an effective smoother. By setting \(\omega = 1\), we can compute the corresponding smoothing factor: $$\mu^{*}(1) = \max \left\{|\mu_{l, m}| : \frac{N+1}{2} \leq l, m \leq N\right\}$$ The associated smoothing factor for the Jacobi method can be found to be larger than the optimal smoothing factor we calculated in Step 3. This implies that the Jacobi method is less effective at reducing high-frequency errors compared to the damped Jacobi method with the optimal damping factor of \(\frac{4}{5}\). Hence, we can conclude that the Jacobi method is not an effective smoother.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Discrete Laplacian
The discrete Laplacian plays a pivotal role in numerical methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and is frequently represented by a matrix denoted as 'A'. When dealing with a grid of points, the discrete Laplacian approximates the second derivatives in the equation by considering the values at a point's immediate neighbors.

For instance, in a two-dimensional grid, applying the discrete Laplacian to a point involves calculating the difference between the value at that point and the average of its neighbors. This process is used to simulate physical phenomena like heat distribution or fluid flow across a plane. The discretization of the Laplacian operator lies at the heart of numerical techniques like the finite difference method, allowing the transformation of continuous PDEs into a set of algebraic equations that can be tackled computationally.

Understanding how the discrete Laplacian connects to the relaxation schemes and iteration matrices is fundamental in numerical analysis. And through its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, we gain insights into the behavior of iterative methods like the Jacobi iteration, setting the stage for the importance of the smoothing factor.
Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Unlocking the Secrets of Matrices

Eigenvalues and eigenvectors are vital concepts within linear algebra, providing powerful insights into linear transformations encoded by matrices. An eigenvector of a matrix is a vector that does not change direction during the transformation, while the eigenvalue is a scalar representing the magnitude by which the eigenvector is scaled.

Mathematically, for a matrix 'A' and a vector 'v', if the equation
\( Av = \text{\lambda} v \)
holds true, then 'v' is an eigenvector and \(\lambda\) is its corresponding eigenvalue. Eigenvectors and eigenvalues reveal much about the properties of 'A', including stability and oscillatory behavior of solutions in PDEs. Moreover, they help in understanding the convergence and efficiency of numerical methods like the Jacobi iteration method for solving systems of linear equations. Their role is so central that they are a key factor in determining the optimal damping factor for relaxation methods.
Jacobi Iteration Method

A Classic Iterative Approach

The Jacobi iteration method is a classic iterative technique used for solving a system of linear equations. Given a system described as \(Ax = b\), where 'A' is a matrix and 'x' and 'b' are vectors, the Jacobi method starts with an initial guess for 'x' and iteratively refines it to approach the true solution.

The iteration is based on the formula:
\(x_{k+1} = x_{k} + \omega D^{-1}(b - Ax_{k})\)
Here, 'k' represents the iteration step, \(D^{-1}\) is the inverse of the diagonal matrix from 'A', and \(\omega\) is the damping factor. Crucially, the choice of \(\omega\) can significantly impact convergence rates. A damping factor that is too high may lead to divergent iterations, while one that is too low may slow down convergence.

An iteration matrix, such as \(T_{\omega}\) in the damped Jacobi method, captures the effect of one iteration step and is a key tool for analyzing convergence properties. The Jacobi method suitably equipped with optimal damping serves as a precursor to more advanced iterative methods like Gauss-Seidel and Successive Overrelaxation (SOR).
Optimal Damping Factor

Calibrating for Efficiency

The optimal damping factor is a critical parameter in the context of iterative methods such as the Jacobi iteration. It influences the rate at which high-frequency errors are reduced with each iteration step. Ideally, set between 0 and 1, the damping factor, denoted as \(\omega\), is adjusted to optimize the smoothing factor for a given problem.

Finding the optimal \(\omega\) is a question of minimizing the largest eigenvalue of the iteration matrix associated with high-frequency errors. This value, termed the spectral radius when it is the maximum absolute eigenvalue, dictates the convergence behavior of the method. For the two-dimensional Laplacian, it's shown that an \(\omega\) value of 4/5 minimizes the spectral radius and thus the smoothing factor, showcasing how properly tuned parameters can immensely improve the effectiveness of an iterative solver.

In practical terms, reducing the smoothing factor speeds up convergence by effectively dampening the errors that take the longest to eliminate - those pesky high-frequency components. This optimization is central to efficient numerical simulations, especially in large-scale computational problems where every iteration counts. The knowledge of the optimal damping factor allows for tailored algorithm parameters, ensuring quicker, more reliable convergence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\(x\) $$ A=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 \end{array}\right) $$ and suppose we are required to solve \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\). (a) Write down explicitly the iteration matrices corresponding to the Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, and SOR schemes. (b) Find the spectral radius of the Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel iteration matrices and the asymptotic rates of convergence for these two schemes. (c) Plot a graph of the spectral radius of the SOR iteration matrix vs. the relaxation parameter \(\omega\) for \(0 \leq \omega \leq 2\). (d) Find the optimal SOR parameter, \(\omega^{*}\). What is the spectral radius of the corresponding iteration matrix? Approximately how much faster would SOR with \(\omega^{*}\) converge compared to Jacobi?

Consider the problem described in Example \(7.1\), where the boundary condition \(u(0, y)=0\) is replaced by $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(0, y)=0 $$ (Example 4.17 considers such a change in one variable, but here life is harder.) Correspondingly, we change the conditions \(u_{0, j}=0, j=1, \ldots, N\), into $$ 4 u_{0, j}-2 u_{1, j}-u_{0, j+1}-u_{0, j-1}=b_{0, j}, \quad 1 \leq j \leq N $$ where still \(u_{0,0}=u_{0, N+1}=0\). You don't need to know for the purposes of this exercise why these new linear relations make sense, only that \(N\) new unknowns and \(N\) new conditions have been introduced. (a) What is the vector of unknowns u now? What is \(\mathbf{b}\) ? What is the dimension of the system? (b) What does \(A\) look like? [Hint: This exercise may not be easy; do it for the case \(N=3\) first!]

Let \(A\) be a general nonsymmetric nonsingular square matrix, and consider the following two alternatives. The first is applying GMRES to solve the linear system \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b} ;\) the second is applying CG to the normal equations $$ A^{T} A \mathbf{x}=A^{T} \mathbf{b} $$ We briefly discussed this in Section \(7.5\); the method we mentioned in that context was CGLS. (a) Suppose your matrix \(A\) is nearly orthogonal. Which of the two solvers is expected to converge faster? (b) Suppose your matrix is block diagonal relative to \(2 \times 2\) blocks, where the \(j\) th block is given by $$ \left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & j-1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right) $$ with \(j=1, \ldots, n / 2\). Which of the two solvers is expected to converge faster? [Hint: Consider the eigenvalues and the singular values of the matrices.]

Continuing Exercise 3 : (a) Show that Jacobi's method will converge for this matrix regardless of the starting vector \(\mathbf{x}_{0}\) (b) Now apply two Jacobi iterations for the problem $$ \begin{aligned} &2 x_{1}+5 x_{2}+5 x_{3}=12 \\ &5 x_{1}+2 x_{2}+5 x_{3}=12 \\ &5 x_{1}+5 x_{2}+2 x_{3}=12 \end{aligned} $$ starting from \(\mathbf{x}_{0}=(0,0,0)^{T}\). Does the method appear to converge? Explain why.

Let \(A\) be a symmetric positive definite \(n \times n\) matrix with entries \(a_{i j}\) that are nonzero only if one of the following holds: \(i=1\), or \(i=n\), or \(j=1\), or \(j=n\), or \(i=j\). Otherwise, \(a_{i j}=0\). (a) Show that only \(5 n-6\) of the \(n^{2}\) elements of \(A\) are possibly nonzero. (b) Plot the zero-structure of \(A\). (In MATLAB you can invent such a matrix for \(n=20\), say, and use spy (A).) (c) Explain why for \(n=100,000\) using chol (see Section 5.5) to solve \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\) for a given right-hand-side vector would be problematic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free