Often in practice, an approximation of the form
$$
u(t)=\gamma_{1} e^{\gamma_{2} t}
$$
is sought for a data fitting problem, where \(\gamma_{1}\) and \(\gamma_{2}\) are
constants. Assume given data \(\left(t_{1}, z_{1}\right),\left(t_{2},
z_{2}\right), \ldots,\left(t_{m}, z_{m}\right)\), where \(z_{i}>0, i=1,2,
\ldots, m\), and \(m>0\)
(a) Explain in one brief sentence why the techniques introduced in the present
chapter cannot be directly applied to find this \(u(t)\).
(b) Considering instead
$$
v(t)=\ln u(t)=\left(\ln \gamma_{1}\right)+\gamma_{2} t
$$
it makes sense to define \(b_{i}=\ln z_{i}, i=1,2, \ldots, m\), and then find
coefficients \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) such that \(v(t)=x_{1}+x_{1} t\) is the best
least squares fit for the data
$$
\left(t_{1}, b_{1}\right),\left(t_{2}, b_{2}\right), \ldots,\left(t_{m},
b_{m}\right)
$$
Using this method, find \(u(t)\) for the data
$$
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline i & 1 & 2 & 3 \\
\hline t_{i} & 0.0 & 1.0 & 2.0 \\
\hline z_{i} & e^{0.1} & e^{0.9} & e^{2} \\
\hline
\end{array}
$$