Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Gauss-Jordan method used to solve the prototype linear system can be described as follows. Augment \(A\) by the right-hand-side vector \(\mathbf{b}\) and proceed as in Gaussian elimination, except use the pivot element \(a_{k k}^{(k-1)}\) to eliminate not only \(a_{i k}^{(k-1)}\) for \(i=k+1, \ldots, n\) but also the elements \(a_{i k}^{(k-1)}\) for \(i=1, \ldots, k-1\), i.e., all elements in the \(k\) th column other than the pivot. Upon reducing \((A \mid \mathbf{b})\) into $$ \left[\begin{array}{cccc|c} a_{11}^{(n-1)} & 0 & \cdots & 0 & b_{1}^{(n-1)} \\ 0 & a_{22}^{(n-1)} & \ddots & \vdots & b_{2}^{(n-1)} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & 0 & \vdots \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & a_{n n}^{(n-1)} & b_{n}^{(n-1)} \end{array}\right], $$ the solution is obtained by setting $$ x_{k}=\frac{b_{k}^{(n-1)}}{a_{k k}^{(n-1)}}, \quad k=1, \ldots, n $$ This procedure circumvents the backward substitution part necessary for the Gaussian elimination algorithm. (a) Write a pseudocode for this Gauss-Jordan procedure using, e.g., the same format as for the one appearing in Section \(5.2\) for Gaussian elimination. You may assume that no pivoting (i.e., no row interchanging) is required. (b) Show that the Gauss-Jordan method requires \(n^{3}+\mathcal{O}\left(n^{2}\right)\) floating point operations for one right- hand-side vector \(\mathbf{b}\) -roughly \(50 \%\) more than what's needed for Gaussian elimination.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Short Answer: The Gauss-Jordan method is an algorithm for solving linear systems of equations with an augmented matrix. It eliminates elements in the k-th column for both rows below and above the pivot element, avoiding the need for backward substitution. The pseudocode for the Gauss-Jordan method consists of nested loops for row and column operations and a separate loop to calculate the solution vector. The computational cost for Gauss-Jordan method is approximately n^3 + O(n^2), which is about 50% more than Gaussian elimination.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Gauss-Jordan Method

The Gauss-Jordan method is an algorithm for solving a linear system with an augmented matrix. Compared with Gaussian elimination, it eliminates elements in the k-th column for both the rows below and above the current pivot element. This allows us to avoid the backward substitution part of the Gaussian elimination algorithm. We set x_k = b_k^{(n-1)} / a_{k k}^{(n-1)} for k = 1, ..., n.
02

Write the pseudocode for the Gauss-Jordan Method

``` 1. for k = 1 to n 2. for i = 1 to n 3. if i != k 4. factor = a^{(k-1)}_{ik} / a^{(k-1)}_{kk} 5. for j = k to n 6. a^{(k)}_{i j} = a^{(k-1)}_{i j} - factor * a^{(k-1)}_{k j} 7. end for 8. b^{(k)}_{i} = b^{(n-1)}_{i} - factor * b^{(n-1)}_{k} 9. end if 10. end for 11. end for 12. for k = 1 to n 13. x_k = b^{(n-1)}_k / a^{(n-1)}_{kk} 14. end for ```
03

Analyze the computational cost of the Gauss-Jordan Method

Let's count the number of floating-point operations in the Gauss-Jordan pseudocode: - Line 4: Division operation: there is one division for each pair of non-pivot rows and columns, leading to a cost of n * (n - 1) - Line 6: Multiplication and subtraction: we have two operations (multipling factor by the pivot element and subtracting it from the current element) for each row (except the pivot row) and each column starting at k in the k-th step, for a total cost of n * (n - 1) * n/2 - Line 8: Multiplication and subtraction: these operations occur for each row (except the pivot row) in the k-th step, for a total cost of n * (n - 1) - Line 13: Division operation: it occurs n times. By summing all these operations, we get a total computational cost of n^3 + O(n^2) which is approximately 50% more than Gaussian elimination.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Systems
Linear systems are mathematical models that represent a set of equations with multiple variables. In these systems, each equation is linear, meaning it is a combination of variables with constant coefficients. Solving linear systems involves finding the values for the variables that make all the equations true simultaneously. This is fundamental in many scientific and engineering applications, as it allows for the modeling and solving of real-world problems.

A typical linear system can be written in matrix form as \(A\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b}\), where \(A\) is the matrix of coefficients, \(\mathbf{x}\) is the vector of variables, and \(\mathbf{b}\) is the vector of constants. Solvers like Gauss-Jordan and Gaussian elimination help in computing the solutions to these systems by transforming the matrix \(A\) into a more easily solvable form. Understanding these methods is crucial for effectively solving linear systems.
Pseudocode
Pseudocode is a high-level description of an algorithm that combines natural language and programming-like structures. It is used to plan and convey the approach to solving a problem without worrying about syntax in a specific language. This makes it accessible as it bridges the gap between algorithm design and coding.

In the context of the Gauss-Jordan method, pseudocode helps in outlining each step of the algorithm to solve a linear system. For example, it directs us on looping through pivot elements and performing arithmetic operations. Such structured guidance makes it easier to translate the algorithm into actual code in a programming language, ensuring that no logical steps are missed.
Floating Point Operations
Floating point operations, often referred to as FLOPs, are arithmetic calculations involving numbers with decimal points. In scientific computing, the efficiency of an algorithm is often gauged by the number of floating point operations it requires to solve a problem.

The Gauss-Jordan method involves numerous floating point operations, such as division, multiplication, and subtraction, all of which are crucial for transforming and reducing the augmented matrix. It's important to note that the Gauss-Jordan approach is computationally more intensive than Gaussian elimination, requiring approximately \(n^3 + \mathcal{O}(n^2)\) FLOPs for a matrix of size \(n\). This computational cost is about 50% greater than that of Gaussian elimination, largely due to the additional operations needed to eliminate elements both above and below each pivot.
Matrix Augmentation
Matrix augmentation refers to the technique of appending the right-hand vector of a system of linear equations to the coefficient matrix, forming a larger matrix. This augmented matrix is used in methods like Gauss-Jordan to solve linear systems.

By augmenting matrix \(A\) with vector \(\mathbf{b}\), we convert the problem into row reduction and pivoting steps. The goal is to systematically transform this augmented matrix into a form where the solution to the original system is obvious. The transformation involves using row operations to modify the rows of the matrix, ultimately leading to an identity matrix on the left side of the augmentation line, and the solution vector \(\mathbf{x}\) on the right.

This method not only simplifies the solving process but also provides a clear visual representation of how the coefficients and constants interact throughout the solution process.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the problem $$ \begin{aligned} x_{1}-x_{2}+3 x_{3} &=2 \\ x_{1}+x_{2} &=4 \\ 3 x_{1}-2 x_{2}+x_{3} &=1 \end{aligned} $$ Carry out Gaussian elimination in its simplest form for this problem. What is the resulting upper triangular matrix? Proceed to find the solution by backward substitution.

(a) Write a MATLAB script that stores a matrix in compressed column form. (b) Write a symmetric version of your program, that is, a script for symmetric matrices, where if \(a_{i, j}\) is stored \((i \neq j)\), then \(a_{j, i}\) is not. Try your programs on a \(5 \times 5\) example of your choice.

This exercise is for lovers of complex arithmetic. Denote by \(\mathbf{x}^{H}\) the conjugate transpose of a given complex-valued vector \(\mathbf{x}\), and likewise for a matrix. The \(\ell_{2}\) -norm is naturally extended to complex- valued vectors by $$ \|\mathbf{x}\|_{2}^{2}=\mathbf{x}^{H} \mathbf{x}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left|x_{i}\right|^{2}, $$ which in particular is real, possibly unlike \(\mathbf{x}^{T} \mathbf{x}\). A complex-valued \(n \times n\) matrix \(A\) is called Hermitian if \(A^{H}=A\). Further, \(A\) is positive definite if $$ \mathbf{x}^{H} A \mathbf{x}>0 $$ for all complex-valued vectors \(\mathbf{x} \neq \mathbf{0}\). (a) Show that the \(1 \times 1\) matrix \(A=t\) is symmetric but not Hermitian, whereas \(B=\left(\begin{array}{cc}2 & t \\ -1 & 2\end{array}\right)\) is Hermitian positive definite but not symmetric. Find the eigenvalues of \(A\) and of \(B\). [In general, all eigenvalues of a Hermitian positive definite matrix are real and positive.] (b) Show that an \(n \times n\) Hermitian positive definite matrix \(A\) can be decomposed as \(A=\) \(L D L^{H}\), where \(D\) is a diagonal matrix with positive entries and \(L\) is a complex-valued unit lower triangular matrix. (c) Extend the Cholesky decomposition algorithm to Hermitian positive definite matrices. Justify.

Let \(B\) be any real, nonsingular \(n \times n\) matrix, where \(n\) is even, and set \(A=B-B^{T}\). Show that \(A\) does not admit an LU decomposition (i.e., some pivoting must be applied, even if \(A\) is nonsingular).

Let \(\mathbf{b}+\delta \mathbf{b}\) be a perturbation of a vector \(\mathbf{b}(\mathbf{b} \neq \mathbf{0})\), and let \(\mathbf{x}\) and \(\delta \mathbf{x}\) be such that \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\) and \(A(\mathbf{x}+\delta \mathbf{x})=\mathbf{b}+\delta \mathbf{b}\), where \(A\) is a given nonsingular matrix. Show that $$ \frac{\|\delta \mathbf{x}\|}{\|\mathbf{x}\|} \leq \kappa(A) \frac{\|\delta \mathbf{b}\|}{\|\mathbf{b}\|} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free