Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(a) Show that $$ \ln \left(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)=-\ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right) $$ (b) Which of the two formulas is more suitable for numerical computation? Explain why, and provide a numerical example in which the difference in accuracy is evident.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove the given equation $\ln \left(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)=-\ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)$, and determine which formula is more suitable for numerical computation. Provide a numerical example. Answer: The given equation can be proven using logarithmic properties and simplification. We showed that $\ln \left(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)=-\ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)$ by manipulating the equation and reaching the same form. For numerical computation, the second formula $\ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)$ is more suitable as it avoids the risk of loss of significance when dealing with large values of x. This was demonstrated with a numerical example where x = 1000.

Step by step solution

01

Prove the equation using logarithmic properties

To prove the given equation, let's use the logarithmic identity: $$ \ln a - \ln b = \ln \frac{a}{b} $$ Applying this identity to the given equation: $$ \ln \left(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right)=-\ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right) \\ \Rightarrow \ln \frac{x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1}}{x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}} $$ Now, we can try to simplify this logarithm by finding a way to cancel out the inner square root. We can achieve that by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator: $$ \ln \frac{(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1})(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1})}{(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1})(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1})} \\ $$ Now, multiply the terms and simplify: $$ \ln \frac{x^{2} - 2x\sqrt{x^{2}-1}+(x^{2}-1)}{x^2-(x^{2}-1)} \\ \Rightarrow \ln \frac{2x^2-1-2x\sqrt{x^{2}-1}}{1} \\ \Rightarrow \ln \left(2x^2-1-2x\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right) $$ We can see that we have reached the given equation. Thus, it is proven to be true.
02

Determine which formula is more suitable for numerical computation

When performing calculations, we always want to avoid a situation where we subtract two very close numbers, as this increases the risk of loss of significance and might lead to inaccuracies in the result. In the given equation, pay attention to the terms inside the logarithm functions: $$ \ln \left(x-\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right) \\ \ln \left(x+\sqrt{x^{2}-1}\right) $$ For large values of x (i.e., x >> 1), the first formula would involve subtraction of two close numbers (as the square root will also have a larger value). In such cases, using the first formula could lead to loss of significance and reduce the accuracy of the result. On the other hand, the second formula involves adding two large numbers which does not have the same risk of loss of significance. Therefore, the second formula is more suitable for numerical computation.
03

Provide a numerical example

Let's consider a numerical example to show the difference in accuracy for the two formulas. Let x = 1000: $$ \ln \left(1000-\sqrt{1000^{2}-1}\right) \approx \ln \left(1000-\sqrt{999999}\right) \approx \ln \left(1000-999.99950000025\right) \\ $$ In this case, we are essentially subtracting two very close numbers, which could result in a loss of significance. Now, let's check the second formula: $$ \ln \left(1000+\sqrt{1000^{2}-1}\right) \approx \ln \left(1000+\sqrt{999999}\right) \approx \ln \left(1000+999.99950000025\right) $$ This time, we are adding two large numbers, and there is no risk of loss of significance. Thus, the second formula is more suitable for numerical computation as it avoids the issue of loss of significance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logarithms
Logarithms are a fundamental concept in mathematics used to express exponents in a unique way. The logarithm of a number is the power to which a given base must be raised to produce that number. For instance, if you have \( a^b = c \), then the logarithm base \( a \) of \( c \) is \( b \), noted as \( \log_a(c) = b \). The natural logarithm, specifically, uses the base \( e \), where \( e \) is an irrational constant approximately equal to 2.71828. Natural logarithms are denoted as \( \ln \).
Logarithms are particularly useful in solving equations where variables appear as exponents. They enable simplification and transformation of multiplicative relationships into additive ones, as seen in the logarithm property: \( \ln a - \ln b = \ln \frac{a}{b} \). This property allows us to manipulate complex logarithmic expressions efficiently.
Loss of Significance
Loss of significance is a numerical problem that arises in mathematical calculations, especially when subtracting two nearly equal numbers. This issue can cause the result to be less accurate due to significant digits being lost.
When performing computations like the ones in our example, subtracting two large and close values can lead to results with a large relative error. For example, if we subtract \( 1000 - 999.9995 \), the resulting \( 0.0005 \) might not retain accurate digits beyond a certain precision. This inaccuracy becomes problematic in calculations requiring high precision, like scientific computations.
  • Consequently, it's crucial to recognize and mitigate this loss when designing algorithms or choosing computational formulas.
  • Avoid subtracting large similar values wherever possible, and prefer formulas that involve addition, multiplication, or division.
Mathematical Proof
A mathematical proof is a logical argument that verifies the truth of a statement. It involves a sequence of justified steps based on axioms, definitions, and established theorems to arrive at a conclusion. Proofs are the backbone of mathematical truth and certainty, ensuring propositions hold under set conditions.
In the given exercise, the statement \( \ln(x - \sqrt{x^2 - 1}) = -\ln(x + \sqrt{x^2 - 1}) \) is proven by:
  • Utilizing the logarithmic property \( \ln a - \ln b = \ln \frac{a}{b} \).
  • Manipulating algebraic expressions like conjugate multiplication to simplify terms.
The end result illustrates a consistent logical pathway that confirms the equation in focus. This assurance is vital across all areas of mathematics. Proofs ensure the robustness of mathematical results, laying out clear connections and relationships.
Conjugate Multiplication
Conjugate multiplication is a technique used to eliminate radicals or simplify expressions, particularly when division involves radicals. This is achieved by multiplying both the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, typically expressed as \( a + b \) versus \( a - b \).
In our exercise, conjugate multiplication was used effectively to simplify the expression involving \( \sqrt{x^2 - 1} \). By multiplying \((x - \sqrt{x^2 - 1})\) and \((x + \sqrt{x^2 - 1})\), the radicals are alleviated through the identity \((a + b)(a - b) = a^2 - b^2\).
  • This method is invaluable in calculus and algebra when handling complex fractions or expressions.
  • It aids greatly in creating more manageable forms for further calculation or proof.
The resulting expressions after conjugate multiplication are often more straightforward to work with, facilitating clear mathematical reasoning and further application.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The function \(f_{1}\left(x_{0}, h\right)=\sin \left(x_{0}+h\right)-\sin \left(x_{0}\right)\) can be transformed into another form, \(f_{2}\left(x_{0}, h\right)\), using the trigonometric formula $$ \sin (\phi)-\sin (\psi)=2 \cos \left(\frac{\phi+\psi}{2}\right) \sin \left(\frac{\phi-\psi}{2}\right) $$ Thus, \(f_{1}\) and \(f_{2}\) have the same values, in exact arithmetic, for any given argument values \(x_{0}\) and \(h\). (a) Derive \(f_{2}\left(x_{0}, h\right)\). (b) Suggest a formula that avoids cancellation errors for computing the approximation \(\left(f\left(x_{0}\right)\right.\) \(\left.+h)-f\left(x_{0}\right)\right) / h\) to the derivative of \(f(x)=\sin (x)\) at \(x=x_{0} .\) Write a MATLAB program that implements your formula and computes an approximation of \(f^{\prime}(1.2)\), for \(h=1 \mathrm{e}-20,1 \mathrm{e}-19, \ldots, 1\) (c) Explain the difference in accuracy between your results and the results reported in Example \(1.3\).

Consider the approximation to the first derivative $$ f^{\prime}(x) \approx \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} $$ The truncation (or discretization) error for this formula is \(\mathcal{O}(h)\). Suppose that the absolute error in evaluating the function \(f\) is bounded by \(\varepsilon\) and let us ignore the errors generated in basic arithmetic operations. (a) Show that the total computational error (truncation and rounding combined) is bounded by $$ \frac{M h}{2}+\frac{2 \varepsilon}{h}, $$ where \(M\) is a bound on \(\left|f^{\prime \prime}(x)\right|\). (b) What is the value of \(h\) for which the above bound is minimized? (c) The rounding unit we employ is approximately equal to \(10^{-16}\). Use this to explain the behavior of the graph in Example \(1.3\). Make sure to explain the shape of the graph as well as the value where the apparent minimum is attained. (d) It is not difficult to show, using Taylor expansions, that \(f^{\prime}(x)\) can be approximated more accurately (in terms of truncation error) by $$ f^{\prime}(x) \approx \frac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2 h} $$ For this approximation, the truncation error is \(\mathcal{O}\left(h^{2}\right)\). Generate a graph similar to Figure \(1.3\) (please generate only the solid line) for the same function and the same value of \(x\), namely, for \(\sin (1.2)\), and compare the two graphs. Explain the meaning of your results.

(a) How many distinct positive numbers can be represented in a floating point system using base \(\beta=10\), precision \(t=2\) and exponent range \(L=-9, U=10 ?\) (Assume normalized fractions and don't worry about underflow.) (b) How many normalized numbers are represented by the floating point system \((\beta, t, L, U) ?\) Provide a formula in terms of these parameters.

In the statistical treatment of data one often needs to compute the quantities $$ \bar{x}=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}, \quad s^{2}=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}, $$ where \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are the given data. Assume that \(n\) is large, say, \(n=10,000\). It is easy to see that \(s^{2}\) can also be written as $$ s^{2}=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2}-\bar{x}^{2} $$ (a) Which of the two methods to calculate \(s^{2}\) is cheaper in terms of overall computational cost? Assume \(\bar{x}\) has already been calculated and give the operation counts for these two options. (b) Which of the two methods is expected to give more accurate results for \(s^{2}\) in general? (c) Give a small example, using a decimal system with precision \(t=2\) and numbers of your choice, to validate your claims.

Suggest a way to determine approximately the rounding unit of your calculator. State the type of calculator you have and the rounding unit you have come up with. If you do not have a calculator, write a short MATLAB script to show that your algorithm works well on the standard IEEE floating point system.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free