Chapter 17: Problem 18
State and re-work the analog of Exercise 3.52 for \(R[X],\) assuming \(2_{R} \in R^{*}\)
Short Answer
Expert verified
#tag_title# Short Answer #tag_content#
The analog of Exercise 3.52 for the polynomial ring \(R[X]\), under the assumption that \(2_R \in R^*\), involves finding a polynomial \(f \in R[X]\) such that \(f^2 = 1\) and \(f \neq 1, -1\). The polynomial \(f(X) = 1 + X\) satisfies the given condition.
Step by step solution
01
Exercise 3.52 analog statement
The analog of Exercise 3.52 for \(R[X]\) could be stated as: Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with \(1 \neq 0\), and suppose that \(2_R \in R^*\). Find a polynomial \(f \in R[X]\) such that \(f^2 = 1\) and \(f \neq 1, -1\).
02
Preliminary observations
The objective is to find a polynomial \(f \in R[X]\) such that \(f^2 = 1\). We are also given that \(2_R \in R^*\), which means that \(2_R\) is a unit in the ring \(R\), and consequently, it has a multiplicative inverse.
03
Proposition
If \(R\) is a commutative ring with \(1 \neq 0\) and \(2_R \in R^*\), then the polynomial \(f(X) = 1 + X\) satisfies the given condition.
04
Proof of the proposition
Let's check if \(f(X) = 1 + X\) satisfies the given condition, namely \(f^2 = 1\) and \(f \neq 1, -1\).
First, we see that \(f \neq 1\) and \(f \neq -1\) as \(f\) has an additional term \(X\) in it.
Now let us compute \(f^2\):
\(f^2 = (1 + X)(1 + X) = 1 + X + X + X^2\)
As \(2_R \in R^*\), it has a multiplicative inverse, say \(2_R^{-1}\). Therefore, \(2_R2_R^{-1} = 1\)
Now let's multiply the equation of \(f^2\) by \(2_R^{-1}\)
\(2_R^{-1}f^2 = 2_R^{-1} + 2_R^{-1}X+ 2_R^{-1}X+ X^2\)
Now factor the middle terms and replace \(2_R2_R^{-1}\) by \(1\):
\(2_R^{-1}f^2 = 1 + (2_R^{-1}+ 2_R^{-1})X + X^2 = 1 + 2_R^{-1}(2_RX) + X^2 = 1 + X + X^2\)
Now we can write the original equation of \(f^2\) and observe that they are equal:
\(f^2 = 1 + X + X^2 = 1 + X + X^2 = 2_R^{-1}f^2\)
Hence, we have found a polynomial \(f(X) = 1 + X\) that satisfies the given condition.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Commutative Ring
A commutative ring is a fundamental concept in algebra and serves as a building block for understanding more complex structures. At its core, a commutative ring is a set equipped with two operations: addition and multiplication. These operations must satisfy specific properties so that every element of the ring can relate to others in predictable ways.
Some key characteristics of a commutative ring include:
Some key characteristics of a commutative ring include:
- Closure: The sum or product of any two elements within the ring results in another element of the same ring.
- Associativity: The way in which elements are grouped when added or multiplied does not affect the outcome.
- Commutativity: The order of addition or multiplication does not matter, i.e., \(a + b = b + a\) and \(a \cdot b = b \cdot a\) for any elements \(a\) and \(b\) in the ring.
- Identity Elements: There exist additive and multiplicative identity elements, typically denoted as 0 and 1, such that for any element \(a\), \(a+0 = a\) and \(a \cdot 1 = a\).
- Distributive Law: Multiplication distributes over addition, i.e., \(a \cdot (b + c) = (a \cdot b) + (a \cdot c)\).
Multiplicative Inverse
The concept of a multiplicative inverse is crucial when working with rings, especially when solving polynomial equations like in the given exercise. In the context of a ring, a multiplicative inverse of an element \(a\) is an element \(a^{-1}\) that, when multiplied together, results in the multiplicative identity of the ring, which is 1.
In a commutative ring \(R\), we say that an element has a multiplicative inverse if it belongs to the group \(R^*\), meaning it is a unit within the ring. Not all elements will have inverses, but if they do, the relationship is expressed as:
In a commutative ring \(R\), we say that an element has a multiplicative inverse if it belongs to the group \(R^*\), meaning it is a unit within the ring. Not all elements will have inverses, but if they do, the relationship is expressed as:
- \(a \cdot a^{-1} = 1\)
- \(a^{-1} \cdot a = 1\)
Polynomial Identity
Polynomial identities are equations that hold true for all values of the variables involved, making them a powerful tool in algebra for expressing complex relationships succinctly. In a ring of polynomials \(R[X]\), these identities can help in solving for unknown polynomials that meet specific conditions, as demonstrated in the exercise.
In our context, a polynomial identity is used to express a condition like \(f^2 = 1\). This means the polynomial \(f\) behaves similarly to \(\pm 1\) when squared, always resulting in the identity element of the polynomial ring. In the given exercise, we found such a polynomial, \(f(X) = 1 + X\), which fulfills this identity, and we ensured it remains distinct from simply 1 or -1 by construction.
Constructing polynomial identities involves understanding not just the form of the polynomial itself, but how its terms interact under the operations of polynomial arithmetic. Solving these often requires not just algebraic manipulation but also logical reasoning to ensure conditions align with the given statements and definitions.
In our context, a polynomial identity is used to express a condition like \(f^2 = 1\). This means the polynomial \(f\) behaves similarly to \(\pm 1\) when squared, always resulting in the identity element of the polynomial ring. In the given exercise, we found such a polynomial, \(f(X) = 1 + X\), which fulfills this identity, and we ensured it remains distinct from simply 1 or -1 by construction.
Constructing polynomial identities involves understanding not just the form of the polynomial itself, but how its terms interact under the operations of polynomial arithmetic. Solving these often requires not just algebraic manipulation but also logical reasoning to ensure conditions align with the given statements and definitions.