Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that the ring \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) is not a UFD.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explain your answer. No, the ring \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) is not a UFD. We found an element (6) that has more than one distinct factorizations into irreducible elements: \((1+\sqrt{-5})(1-\sqrt{-5})\) and \((2)(3)\). These factorizations cannot be made multiples of one another by the units in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\), which demonstrates that the ring is not a UFD.

Step by step solution

01

Find distinct factorizations of 6 in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\)

First, let's find distinct factorizations of 6 in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\). We can have two possible factorizations for 6: 1. \((1+\sqrt{-5})(1-\sqrt{-5})\) 2. \((2)(3)\) Now, we need to show that these factorizations are in terms of irreducible elements.
02

Show the elements involved in the factorizations are irreducible

Recall that an element is irreducible if it cannot be written as the product of two non-unit elements. 1. \((1+\sqrt{-5})\) and \((1-\sqrt{-5})\): For both of these elements, their norms are given by \(N(a+b\sqrt{-5}) = a^2 + 5b^2\). So, \(N(1+\sqrt{-5}) = 1^2 + 5(1)^2 = 6\) and \(N(1-\sqrt{-5}) = 1^2 + 5(1)^2 = 6\). Both elements have a norm of 6, which is a prime number in \(\mathbb{Z}\). Thus, neither of them can be factored as a product of two non-unit elements in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\), making them irreducible. 2. \((2)\) and \((3)\): These are prime integers in \(\mathbb{Z}\), and hence cannot be factored as a product of two elements in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) with smaller distinct norms, making them irreducible in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) as well.
03

Show that the factorizations are not multiples of one another by units in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\)

Now, let's consider the units of \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\). An element is a unit if its norm is 1. In \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\), the only elements with a norm of 1 are 1 and -1 (considering that the norm is given by \(N(a+b\sqrt{-5}) = a^2 + 5b^2\)). So, there's no possible way to make the factorizations multiples of one another by using the units 1 or -1. Thus, the ring \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\) is not a UFD since the element 6 has two distinct factorizations into irreducible elements: 1. \((1+\sqrt{-5})(1-\sqrt{-5})\) 2. \((2)(3)\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ring Theory
Ring theory is a fundamental branch of abstract algebra focusing on rings and their properties. A ring is a collection of elements equipped with two binary operations: addition and multiplication. These operations must satisfy several axioms, such as associativity and distributivity. This means:
  • Associativity: For all elements \(a, b, \) and \(c\) in the ring, \((a + b) + c = a + (b + c)\) and \((a \cdot b) \cdot c = a \cdot (b \cdot c)\).
  • Distributivity: Multiplication distributes over addition, \(a \cdot (b + c) = (a \cdot b) + (a \cdot c)\).
Rings often have additional structures, like unity (identity elements) or being commutative. For a ring to be a Unique Factorization Domain (UFD), every element in the ring should be expressible as a product of irreducible elements uniquely, except for order and units. The challenge sometimes lies in confirming whether specific number rings, such as \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\), fulfill these conditions.
Irreducible Elements
Irreducible elements are crucial in understanding the structure of rings. An element \(r\) in a ring is irreducible if not only is it non-zero and not a unit, but it also cannot be factored into a product of two non-unit elements within that ring. However, not every irreducible element is prime.
Consider the ring \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\). Elements like \(1+\sqrt{-5}\) and \(1-\sqrt{-5}\) are irreducible here because their norms are 6, a prime number in the integers \(\mathbb{Z}\).
They cannot be split into products of other non-unit elements with smaller norms. Recognizing irreducible elements helps assess the factorization properties of a ring, informing us about its nature as either a UFD or not.
Norms in Quadratic Rings
Norm functions are pivotal when working with quadratic rings and extended numbers. In a quadratic ring of the form \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}]\), the norm of an element \(a + b\sqrt{d}\) is calculated as \(a^2 - db^2\). This measure helps determine properties like factorization and irreducibility.
For \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]\), the norm is given by the formula \(N(a+b\sqrt{-5}) = a^2 + 5b^2\). This allows mathematicians to ascribe each element a positive integer value, guiding the factorization into irreducible components.
  • If the norm is prime in \(\mathbb{Z}\), then the element may be irreducible.
  • Norms help in verifying non-equivalent factorizations within a ring.
By studying policy norms, we identify that norms provide a way to unveil deeper insights into factorization behaviors within algebraic rings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(F\) be a field. Show that \(F((X))\) is the field of fractions of \(F \llbracket X \rrbracket ;\) that is, there is no subfield \(E \subsetneq F((X))\) that contains \(F \llbracket X \rrbracket\).

(a) Show that the "is associate to" relation is an equivalence relation. (b) Consider an equivalence class \(C\) induced by the "is associate to" relation. Show that if \(C\) contains an irreducible element, then all elements of \(C\) are irreducible. (c) Suppose that for every equivalence class \(C\) that contains irreducibles, we choose one element of \(C,\) and call it a distinguished irreducible. Show that \(D\) is a UFD if and only if every non-zero element of \(D\) can be expressed as \(u p_{1}^{e_{1}} \cdots p_{r}^{e_{r}},\) where \(u\) is a unit, \(p_{1}, \ldots, p_{r}\) are distinguished irreducibles, and this expression is unique up to a reordering of the \(p_{i}\) 's.

Let \(F\) be a field, and consider the ring of bivariate polynomials \(F[X, Y]\). Show that in this ring, the polynomial \(X^{2}+Y^{2}-1\) is irreducible, provided \(F\) does not have characteristic 2 . What happens if \(F\) has characteristic \(2 ?\)

Let \(E\) be an extension field of a field \(F,\) and let \(\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{n} \in E\) be algebraic over \(F\). Show that the ring \(F\left[\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{n}\right]\) (see Example 7.45 ) is in fact a field, and that \(F\left[\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{n}\right]\) is a finite (and hence algebraic) extension of \(F\).

Show that in a PID, all non-zero prime ideals are maximal (see Exercise 7.38 ). Recall that for a complex number \(\alpha=a+b i\), with \(a, b \in \mathbb{R},\) the norm of \(\alpha\) was defined as \(N(\alpha)=\alpha \bar{\alpha}=a^{2}+b^{2}\) (see Example 7.5). There are other measures of the "size" of a complex number that are useful. The absolute value of \(\alpha\) is defined as \(|\alpha|:=\sqrt{N(\alpha)}=\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}\). The max norm of \(\alpha\) is defined as \(M(\alpha):=\max \\{|a|,|b|\\}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free