Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the simple linear regression model \(y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x+u,\) suppose that \(\mathrm{E}(u) \neq 0 .\) Letting \(\alpha_{0}=\mathrm{E}(u),\) show that the model can always be rewritten with the same slope, but a new intercept and error, where the new error has a zero expected value.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Rewrite the model as \( y = \beta_0' + \beta_1 x + u' \), where \( \beta_0' = \beta_0 + \alpha_0 \) and \( \mathrm{E}(u') = 0 \).

Step by step solution

01

Original Model and Condition

The original simple linear regression model is given by \( y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x + u \), where the expected value of the error term \( u \) is not zero, \( \mathrm{E}(u) eq 0 \). We define \( \alpha_0 = \mathrm{E}(u) \).
02

Express Error Term with New Mean

Since \( \alpha_0 = \mathrm{E}(u) \), we can partition the error term \( u \) into two components: its mean and a deviation from that mean. Therefore, we express \( u \) as \( u = \alpha_0 + u' \), where \( u' \) is the new error term such that \( \mathrm{E}(u') = \mathrm{E}(u - \alpha_0) = \mathrm{E}(u) - \alpha_0 = 0 \).
03

Substitute New Error into Model

Substitute \( u = \alpha_0 + u' \) into the original model \( y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x + u \). This gives us:\[ y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x + \alpha_0 + u' \].
04

Rewrite the Model with New Intercept

To rewrite the equation, combine \( \beta_0 \) and \( \alpha_0 \) into a new intercept \( \beta_0' \), where \( \beta_0' = \beta_0 + \alpha_0 \). Thus, the model becomes:\[ y = \beta_0' + \beta_1 x + u', \]where \( \mathrm{E}(u') = 0 \).
05

Conclusion

The model is now written with the same slope \( \beta_1 \), but with a new intercept \( \beta_0' \) and a new error term \( u' \), where \( \mathrm{E}(u') = 0 \), satisfying the condition for a typical linear regression error term.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Simple Linear Regression
In simple linear regression, we explore the relationship between two variables by fitting a linear equation to the observed data. This model takes the form:
  • \( y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x + u \)
where:
  • \( y \) represents the dependent variable
  • \( x \) is the independent variable
  • \( \beta_0 \) is the intercept, indicating where the line crosses the y-axis
  • \( \beta_1 \) is the slope, showing how much \( y \) changes on average with a one-unit change in \( x \)
  • \( u \) is the error term, capturing other factors affecting \( y \)
The goal in simple linear regression is to predict \( y \) based on \( x \), optimizing \( \beta_0 \) and \( \beta_1 \) to minimize the error in predictions. This model is essential for illustrating basic relationships between two variables, making it foundational in various fields, including economics, biology, and engineering.
Decoding the Error Term
An important component of any regression model is the error term. In our simple linear regression model, the error term \( u \) represents the variation in \( y \) that is not explained by \( x \). This term captures:
  • Random fluctuations in the data
  • Omitted variable impacts
  • Measurement errors
For effective regression analysis, we often assume that \( \mathrm{E}(u) = 0 \), meaning the errors average out to zero in the long run. This assumption ensures unbiased estimates of \( \beta_0 \) and \( \beta_1 \). However, if \( \mathrm{E}(u) eq 0 \), adjustments must be made to maintain the integrity of our model. By redefining \( u \) into \( \alpha_0 + u' \) with an adjusted error term \( u' \), which satisfies \( \mathrm{E}(u') = 0 \), our model remains valid and unbiased.
Expected Value in Regression
The expected value in regression, particularly of the error term \( u \), is a statistical concept indicating the mean or average value that \( u \) would assume over numerous samples. It is crucial for the error term in a regression model to have an expected value of zero \( \mathrm{E}(u) = 0 \). This condition ensures that the error term does not systematically bias the predictions. If the expected value of the error term deviates from zero, it implies the error is non-randomly shifting the predicted line vertically, potentially distorting the relationship between \( x \) and \( y \). Thus, when \( \mathrm{E}(u) eq 0 \), we need to conduct an intercept adjustment.
Intercept Adjustment for Optimal Predictions
Intercept adjustment is a critical step when \( \mathrm{E}(u) eq 0 \) in a regression model. In our example, we saw how the intercept was recalculated as \( \beta_0' = \beta_0 + \alpha_0 \). This modification:
  • Compensates for the non-zero expectation of \( u \)
  • Ensures the regression line reflects true relationships
  • Preserves the slope \( \beta_1 \)
  • Redefines \( u \) as \( u' \) where \( \mathrm{E}(u') = 0 \)
By making the intercept adjustment, we align the regression model with the fundamental assumption that the expected error term is zero. Such refinements allow for more accurate and unbiased insights from the regression analysis, essential for making reliable conclusions in research and applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the potential outcomes framework with heterogeneous (nonconstant) treatment effect, write the error as$$u_{i}=\left(1-x_{i}\right) u_{i}(0)+x_{i} u_{i}(1).$$Let \(\sigma_{0}^{2}=\operatorname{Var}\left[u_{i}(0)\right]\) and \(\sigma_{1}^{2}=\operatorname{Var}\left[u_{i}(1)\right] .\) Assume random assignment. i. Find \(\operatorname{Var}\left(u_{i} | x_{i}\right)\).ii. When is \(\operatorname{Var}\left(u_{i} | x_{i}\right)\) constant?

Let \(\hat{\beta}_{0}\) and \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) be the OLS intercept and slope estimators, respectively, and let \(\bar{u}\) be the sample average of the errors (not the residuals!). i. Show that \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) can be written as \(\widehat{\beta}_{1}=\beta_{1}+\sum_{i=1}^{n} w_{i} u_{i},\) where \(w_{i}=d_{i} / \mathrm{SST}_{x}\) and \(d_{i}=x_{i}-\bar{x}\). ii. Use part (i), along with \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} w_{i}=0,\) to show that \(\widehat{\beta}_{1}\) and \(\bar{u}\) are uncorrelated. [Hint: You are being asked to show that \(\left.\mathrm{E}\left[\left(\widehat{\beta}_{1}-\beta_{1}\right) \cdot \bar{u}\right]=0 .\right]\) iii. Show that \(\widehat{\beta}_{0}\) can be written as \(\widehat{\beta}_{0}=\beta_{0}+\bar{u}-\left(\widehat{\beta}_{1}-\beta_{1}\right) \bar{x}\). iv. Use parts (ii) and (iii) to show that \(\operatorname{Var}\left(\widehat{\beta}_{0}\right)=\sigma^{2} / n+\sigma^{2}(\bar{x})^{2} / \mathrm{SST}_{x}\). v. Do the algebra to simplify the expression in part (iv) to equation (2.58) [Hint: \(\left.\operatorname{SST}_{x} / n=n^{-1} \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{2}-(\bar{x})^{2} \cdot\right]\)

The data set BWGHT contains data on births to women in the United States. Two variables of interest are the dependent variable, infant birth weight in ounces (bwght), and an explanatory variable, average number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day during pregnancy (cigs). The following simple regression was estimated using data on \(n=1,388\) births: $$\widehat{b w g h t}=119.77-0.514 \mathrm{cigs}$$ i. What is the predicted birth weight when \(\operatorname{cigs}=0\) ? What about when \(\operatorname{cigs}=20\) (one pack per day)? Comment on the difference. ii. Does this simple regression necessarily capture a causal relationship between the child's birth weight and the mother's smoking habits? Explain. iii. To predict a birth weight of 125 ounces, what would cigs have to be? Comment. iv. The proportion of women in the sample who do not smoke while pregnant is about. \(85 .\) Does this help reconcile your finding from part (iii)?

Using data from 1988 for houses sold in Andover, Massachusetts, from Kiel and Mcclain (1995) , the following equation relates housing price (price) to the distance from a recently built garbage incinerator (dist): $$\begin{aligned} \widehat{\log (\text {price})} &=9.40+0.312 \log (\text {dist}) \\ n &=135, R^{2}=0.162. \end{aligned}$$ i. Interpret the coefficient on log (dist). Is the sign of this estimate what you expect it to be? ii. Do you think simple regression provides an unbiased estimator of the ceteris paribus elasticity of price with respect to dist? (Think about the city's decision on where to put the incinerator. iii. What other factors about a house affect its price? Might these be correlated with distance from the incinerator?

In the potential outcomes framework, suppose that program eligibility is randomly assigned but participation cannot be enforced. To formally describe this situation, for each person \(i, z_{i}\) is the eligibility indicator and \(x_{i}\) is the participation indicator. Randomized eligibility means \(z_{i}\) is independent of \(\left[y_{i}(0), y_{i}(1)\right]\) but \(x_{i}\) might not satisfy the independence assumption. i. Explain why the difference in means estimator is generally no longer unbiased. ii. In the context of a job training program, what kind of individual behavior would cause bias?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on History Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free