Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If the San Andreas fault moves 2 meters ( \(6.6\) feet) per big earthquake, and plate movement is \(2.5\) centimeters (0.025 meter per year, or 1 inch per year), how many years of plate motion must accumulate to produce one big earthquake? (Assume all plate motion is accommodated by movements on the San Andreas fault.) a) 4 years b) 20 years c) 80 years d) 200 years

Short Answer

Expert verified
c) 80 years

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Given Information

We need to determine the number of years required for the plate movement to accumulate to cause a 2-meter shift in the San Andreas fault. This is known to happen in each big earthquake. The annual plate movement is given as 0.025 meters, or 2.5 centimeters.
02

Set Up the Equation

We need to find out how many years it will take for the total cumulative plate movement to equal 2 meters. We express this in the equation form: \[2 = 0.025 \times \text{years}\]
03

Solve the Equation

To solve for the number of years, divide both sides of the equation by 0.025: \[\text{years} = \frac{2}{0.025}\] Evaluating this, we get: \[\text{years} = 80\]
04

Compare with the Options

The calculated number of years is 80. Reviewing the options provided in the problem: - a) 4 years - b) 20 years - c) 80 years - d) 200 years The correct answer is option c) 80 years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

San Andreas Fault
The San Andreas Fault is one of the most famous fault lines in the world. This massive crack in the Earth's crust stretches about 1,200 kilometers through California. It's the boundary where the Pacific Plate meets the North American Plate.

The fault is a transform fault, which means it is mostly caused by horizontal slip between the plates. These horizontal movements result in some significant earthquakes. When stress builds up along the fault, it eventually gets released in the form of earthquakes. The San Andreas Fault is known for its potential to produce major seismic events.

Since it's such a well-known fault line, scientists frequently study it to understand the mechanics of earthquakes and improve prediction efforts.
Earthquake Prediction
Predicting earthquakes is a challenging science. Despite advancements in technology, it remains difficult to predict exactly when and where an earthquake will happen.

Scientists focus on monitoring fault lines, like the San Andreas Fault, to understand how stress builds up over time. They use various methods:
  • Seismometers to detect ground vibrations.
  • GPS to measure changes in the Earth's surface.
  • Historical data to identify patterns in earthquake activity.
  • Geological studies to learn more about fault structures.
While these methods provide valuable data, they mostly help in understanding long-term patterns rather than predicting specific earthquakes. Instead of exact predictions, scientists can often estimate probabilities of earthquake occurrences in certain areas over extended time frames.
Plate Movement Calculation
Calculating plate movement helps scientists understand how stress accumulates on fault lines like the San Andreas Fault.

Plate movement is typically slow, often just a few centimeters per year. However, over time, this movement can add up, leading to significant geological shifts.

Let's revisit the original problem: if the San Andreas Fault moves 2 meters in each big earthquake, and the plates shift at 2.5 centimeters per year, we need to calculate the accumulation time.
  • Given: annual movement = 0.025 meters per year.
  • Accumulation required for big earthquake = 2 meters.
The equation to solve is straightforward: \[2 = 0.025 \times \text{years}\]Solving this gives:\[\text{years} = \frac{2}{0.025} = 80\]This tells us it takes about 80 years for the plate movements to build enough stress to potentially cause a major earthquake along the fault.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The discovery of the potential for megathrust earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone is an example of how scientific explanations are developed. Briefly explain how the development of this hypothesis illustrated the following characteristics of scientific explanations: 1\. It was provisional (tentative). 2\. It was based on observations. 3\. It was predictable and testable. 4\. It offered a natural cause for natural events.

Three sites (L1, L2, L3) record earthquake magnitude and earthquake intensity for the same earthquake. \(\mathrm{Ll}\) is located closest to the focus and L3 is farthest away. Where is the intensity greatest, and what happens to the earthquake magnitude calculated at the different sites? a) Intensity is greatest at Ll; calculated magnitude is the same at each site. b) Intensity is greatest at L3; calculated magnitude is the same at each site. c) Intensity is greatest at Ll; calculated magnitude decreases with distance from the focus. d) Intensity is greatest at L3; calculated magnitude decreases with distance from the focus.

An earthquake occurred on the Erie fault 5 kilometers ( 3 miles) beneath San Gabriel. Damage from the earthquake was greatest in nearby Fremont. The farthest report of shaking was recorded in Stockton. Where was the earthquake's epicenter? a) The Erie fault c) Fremont b) San Gabriel d) Stockton

Warning times associated with some natural hazards can be measured in months (volcanoes), days (hurricanes), or minutes (tornadoes). Scientists in Japan have designed an earthquake warning system using an extensive network of seismographs. They use the arrival of \(P\) waves to trigger an alarm that can stop high-speed trains before the arrival of the more damaging \(S\) waves and the later surface waves. How would such a system affect citizens in a densely populated city such as Los Angeles that is situated near numerous active faults?

Are earthquake insurance rates based on inductive or deductive reasoning? Explain your choice. (Review information on inductive and deductive reasoning from Chapter 1 if necessary.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Geography Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free