Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Warning times associated with some natural hazards can be measured in months (volcanoes), days (hurricanes), or minutes (tornadoes). Scientists in Japan have designed an earthquake warning system using an extensive network of seismographs. They use the arrival of \(P\) waves to trigger an alarm that can stop high-speed trains before the arrival of the more damaging \(S\) waves and the later surface waves. How would such a system affect citizens in a densely populated city such as Los Angeles that is situated near numerous active faults?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The system provides early warnings that can significantly improve safety by allowing people and infrastructures to prepare for more damaging earthquake waves.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

In this exercise, we have to explore how an earthquake warning system, like the one used in Japan, affects citizens in a densely populated city such as Los Angeles, which is near numerous active faults. The warning system is based on the detection of primary waves, or P waves, which are the initial waves produced during an earthquake.
02

Identify the Key Features of the Warning System

The earthquake warning system utilizes seismographs to detect P waves, which travel faster than secondary waves (S waves) and surface waves. By detecting these P waves early, the system can issue an alert before the more damaging waves arrive, giving people time to take protective actions.
03

Evaluating the Impact on Citizens

In a densely populated city like Los Angeles, an effective warning system could have several impacts: - It allows high-speed trains and other critical infrastructures to stop or take safety measures, potentially avoiding accidents and damage. - It provides citizens with valuable seconds to find safety or evacuate buildings, reducing injuries and fatalities. - It can trigger automated responses in infrastructure such as shutting down gas lines, which can lower the risk of fires.
04

Consider Limitations and Challenges

Although such a system can significantly enhance safety, there are limitations. The warning time is only a few seconds to a few tens of seconds, which might not be enough in all circumstances. Additionally, people may not always know how to react swiftly, and densely populated cities have logistical challenges in regards to evacuation. Continuous public education and effective drills are necessary to maximize the benefits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Seismographs
Earthquake Early Warning Systems heavily rely on seismographs, which are essential tools for detecting earth tremors. These devices measure and record seismic waves generated by earth movements. In this role, they are crucial for determining the time, location, and magnitude of an earthquake. Seismographs function by utilizing a suspended mass, known as a pendulum, that remains still while the frame of the device moves with the ground during shaking.
This movement is recorded, allowing scientists to analyze the earthquake's characteristics.
Modern seismographs are capable of detecting even the faint tremors caused by P waves, providing the first indication that an earthquake has started. By promptly identifying these waves, seismographs enable warning systems to issue alerts and initiate necessary safety measures.
P waves
When an earthquake occurs, several types of seismic waves are generated, and P waves, or primary waves, are one of the first to be detected. They travel faster than any other type of seismic wave and move through both liquid and solid layers of the Earth. This speed allows them to reach seismic stations quickly, often preceding the more destructive types of waves such as the secondary waves (S waves) or surface waves.
P waves compress and expand the ground they pass through, somewhat like sound waves traveling through the air.
Their detection is pivotal for earthquake early warning systems because by recognizing P waves, authorities can gain those few crucial seconds to prepare and implement safety measures before the detrimental S waves arrive.
Seismic Safety Measures
In densely populated areas, implementing seismic safety measures is vital to mitigate the impacts of earthquakes. When a warning system detects P waves, it can activate several automated safety protocols.
  • High-speed trains can be halted to prevent derailments.
  • Gas lines can be automatically shut off to avoid explosions and fires.
  • Electric grids can be regulated to minimize interruptions and electrical disasters.
These actions not only protect infrastructure but also save lives by reducing the potential hazards in the immediate aftermath of an earthquake.
The effectiveness of these measures often depends on the rapid and accurate dissemination of the seismographic data collected.
Natural Hazards
Earthquakes represent a significant threat as natural hazards, especially for regions like Los Angeles that are situated along active fault lines. Unlike other natural disasters that offer more prolonged warning signals, earthquakes provide mere seconds to minutes of advance notice, largely thanks to the technology of early warning systems.
The rapid detection of seismic activity and the ability to instantly alert populations are crucial to reducing the impact of these sudden disasters.
Earthquake preparedness requires continuous monitoring of seismic activities, as well as infrastructural readiness to withstand such events.
Public Safety Education
Public safety education is fundamental in ensuring that communities are prepared for earthquakes. Understanding how to react promptly when an earthquake warning is issued can significantly reduce casualties and injuries.
Education programs help citizens learn the steps they need to take, such as where to find secure areas, how to "Drop, Cover, and Hold On," and ways to prepare emergency kits.
  • Regular drills can bolster public readiness and confidence.
  • Awareness campaigns can educate citizens about the specifics and benefits of early warning systems.
  • Community workshops can demonstrate how to fortify homes and workplaces against seismic activity.
A community well-versed in these practices is better equipped to respond effectively to earthquakes and reduce the overall risk posed by these natural hazards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An earthquake occurred on the Erie fault 5 kilometers ( 3 miles) beneath San Gabriel. Damage from the earthquake was greatest in nearby Fremont. The farthest report of shaking was recorded in Stockton. Where was the earthquake's epicenter? a) The Erie fault c) Fremont b) San Gabriel d) Stockton

The discovery of the potential for megathrust earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone is an example of how scientific explanations are developed. Briefly explain how the development of this hypothesis illustrated the following characteristics of scientific explanations: 1\. It was provisional (tentative). 2\. It was based on observations. 3\. It was predictable and testable. 4\. It offered a natural cause for natural events.

If the San Andreas fault moves 2 meters ( \(6.6\) feet) per big earthquake, and plate movement is \(2.5\) centimeters (0.025 meter per year, or 1 inch per year), how many years of plate motion must accumulate to produce one big earthquake? (Assume all plate motion is accommodated by movements on the San Andreas fault.) a) 4 years b) 20 years c) 80 years d) 200 years

Three sites (L1, L2, L3) record earthquake magnitude and earthquake intensity for the same earthquake. \(\mathrm{Ll}\) is located closest to the focus and L3 is farthest away. Where is the intensity greatest, and what happens to the earthquake magnitude calculated at the different sites? a) Intensity is greatest at Ll; calculated magnitude is the same at each site. b) Intensity is greatest at L3; calculated magnitude is the same at each site. c) Intensity is greatest at Ll; calculated magnitude decreases with distance from the focus. d) Intensity is greatest at L3; calculated magnitude decreases with distance from the focus.

Are earthquake insurance rates based on inductive or deductive reasoning? Explain your choice. (Review information on inductive and deductive reasoning from Chapter 1 if necessary.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Geography Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free