Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Weather Forecast Evaluation Go to the Weather Channel website (www.weather.com) and enter your city or Zip code. Follow directions at the site to obtain the 10-day forecast for your location. 1\. How could you measure the accuracy of the forecast? Create a scoring scheme that anyone could use to determine the accuracy of the forecast. Describe your scheme. 2\. Track the weather over the next 10 days and evaluate the accuracy of the forecast.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Create a scoring system for parameters like temperature and precipitation, track actual weather, and calculate scores to evaluate forecast accuracy.

Step by step solution

01

Define Weather Parameters

Determine which weather parameters you will consider for evaluating the accuracy of the forecast. Common parameters include temperature, precipitation, and wind speed. For simplicity, let's choose temperature and precipitation.
02

Scoring Scheme for Temperature

Create a scoring scheme for temperature accuracy. For example, assign a score of 2 points if the forecasted temperature is within 2°C of the actual temperature, 1 point if within 5°C, and 0 points if it is more than 5°C off.
03

Scoring Scheme for Precipitation

Develop a scoring system for precipitation. Assign a score of 1 point for accurate prediction (e.g., rain or no rain correctly predicted) and 0 points for incorrect prediction.
04

Collect Forecast Data

Start by noting down the 10-day forecast from the Weather Channel, focusing on the parameters defined in Step 1 for each day.
05

Track Actual Weather

Over the next 10 days, record the actual weather observations from a reliable source for the same parameters and location.
06

Calculate Daily Scores

For each day, use the scoring scheme from Steps 2 and 3 to calculate a daily score based on how accurate the forecast was compared to actual conditions.
07

Evaluate Overall Accuracy

Add up the daily scores to get a total score for the 10-day period. The maximum score, using our scheme, would be 30 points (2 points for temperature and 1 for precipitation each day). A higher score indicates a more accurate forecast.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Forecast Accuracy
When evaluating weather forecasts, accuracy is all about how closely the predictions match the actual weather conditions. Forecast accuracy is crucial because reliable weather predictions can help individuals and communities prepare for upcoming weather events, reducing risks and inconveniences.
To measure forecast accuracy effectively, it is essential to compare predicted values with the actual outcomes on parameters such as temperature, precipitation, and wind speed. The degree of closeness provides a numerical assessment of how correct a weather prediction is.
In practical terms, if the predicted temperature is nearly identical to the actual temperature experienced, the forecast is said to be highly accurate. In contrast, large discrepancies between predicted and actual values indicate lower accuracy and potential weaknesses in the forecasting model.
Scoring Scheme for Weather
To have an objective method of evaluating forecast accuracy, a scoring scheme can be developed. This scheme assigns numerical values to predictions based on how closely they align with actual outcomes.
For temperature, a simple scoring scheme might assign:
  • 2 points if the predicted temperature is within 2°C of the actual temperature.
  • 1 point if it is within 5°C.
  • 0 points if it is more than 5°C off.
For precipitation, the scoring can be more straightforward:
  • 1 point for a correct prediction of rain or no rain.
  • 0 points if the prediction is incorrect.
By applying such a consistent scoring scheme, anyone can objectively assess the accuracy of weather forecasts over a specified period.
Weather Parameters
Weather parameters are the different elements or aspects of weather that forecasts predict. These parameters can vary greatly, but common ones include temperature, precipitation, and wind speed.
Assessing the accuracy of these parameters involves observing the real-world weather and comparing it to the forecast. Choosing which parameters to evaluate depends on the purpose of the prediction.
For instance, someone planning an outdoor event might be most concerned with precipitation and temperature, whereas an airline would be interested in wind speeds and visibility.
Focusing on specific parameters for evaluation helps streamline the assessment process and make it more relevant to particular needs or scenarios.
Weather Prediction Evaluation
The process of weather prediction evaluation involves comparing the forecasts to actual weather outcomes to determine their reliability. This is done by tracking predicted and observed weather over a set period and applying a scoring scheme to evaluate their accuracy.
The evaluation includes steps such as obtaining the forecast data, recording actual weather observations, and using a scoring system to compute daily scores. Adding these scores over a period helps in determining the overall accuracy of the forecasts.
By understanding the results of weather prediction evaluations, improvements can be made in forecasting methods. This allows adjustments to models for better accuracy, benefiting various sectors like agriculture, aviation, and public safety.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Updrafts responsible for the formation of thunderstorm clouds are most likely to occur with which combination of conditions? a) Low-level warm, moist air; upper-level warm, moist air b) Low-level cool, dry air, upper-level warm, moist air c) Low-level warm, moist air; upper-level cool, dry air d) Low-level cool, dry air, upper-level cool, dry air.

Explain why the number of tornadoes counted each year has increased, while the number of days with at least one tornado sighting has remained essentially unchanged for several decades.

Draw a diagram that illustrates how the four components of the earth system (atmosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere, and geosphere) interact during a hurricane.

Hurricane Evaluation Rubric You work with a team of disaster specialists for the Weather Channel. During discussions about coverage of the upcoming hurricane season, your boss states that she doesn't believe the Saffir-Simpson scale sufficiently reflects the risks associated with hurricanes because it places so much emphasis on the physical characteristics of the storm. The channel wants to create its own scoring system that better evaluates the potential damage from incoming hurricanes. 1\. You and your team are assigned to create an evaluation rubric to assess factors influencing the risk of damage from a future hurricane. On the table presented here, identify at least five additional factors; one (wind speed) has been included as an example. When developing your rubric, consider both physical and cultural factors. 2\. After completing the rubric, you realize that some factors are more significant than others. Your team decides to double the score of the most important factor. Which factor do they choose? Why? 3\. Read the following descriptions of Hurricanes Dennis and Mitch that are abbreviated versions of accounts published by the National Climatic Data Center (www.ncdc.noaa.gov). Do these descriptions cause you to change any of the categories in your scoring rubric? Rank these storms, using your modified rubric. Hurricane Dennis, August 1999. The coastal areas of North Carolina experienced their fourth tropical storm scare in as many years in late August. Hurricane Dennis developed over the eastern Bahamas on August 26 and | Factors | Low risk (1 point) | Moderate risk (2 points) | High risk (3 points) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Wind speed (Category 1,2) | Intermediate (Category 3) | High (Category 4, 5) | | | | | | | drifted northward parallel to the southeast US coast. Dennis became an immediate threat to southeastern North Carolina on August 29. The storm center came to within 97 kilometers ( 60 miles) of the coast early on August 30 as a strong category 2 hurricane with highest sustained winds of 166 kilometers per hour (103 miles per hour). Rainfall amounts approached 25 centimeters ( 10 inches) in coastal southeastern North Carolina. This area is no stranger to hurricane activity. Category 2 Hurricane Bertha and category 3 Hurricane Fran hit Brunswick County in 1996 , and Hurricane Bonnie (category 2 ) followed nearly the same path in 1998 . Prior to 1996 , the area had been spared from the direct impact of a hurricane since Charlie (category 1) hit Carteret County in \(1986 .\) Because Hurricane Dennis never made landfall, damage was only moderate. However, the storm lingered off the coast for several days, so beach erosion and damage to coastal highways were significant. Residents of Hatteras and Ocracoke Islands were stranded for several days because of severe damage to Highway 12 . Hurricane Mitch, October/November 1998. Hurricane Mitch will be remembered as the most deadly hurricane to strike the Western Hemisphere in the last two centuries. The death toll was reported as 11,000 , with thousands of others missing. More than 3 million people were either left homeless or otherwise severely affected by the storm. In this extremely poor developing region of the globe, estimates of the total damage exceeded \(\$ 5\) billion. Within 4 days of its origin as a tropical depression on October 22, Mitch had grown into a category 5 storm. On October 26, the monster storm had deepened to a pressure of 905 millibars, with sustained winds of 155 knots (180 miles per hour) and gusts well over 200 miles per hour. Mitch moved westward, and on October 27 , it was about 97 kilometers ( 60 miles) north of Honduras. Preliminary wave height estimates north of Honduras during this time were as high as \(13.5\) meters (44 feet), according to one model. Although the ferocious winds began to abate slowly, it took Mitch 2 days to drift southward and make landfall. Mitch then began a slow westward drift through the mountainous interior of Honduras, finally reaching the border with Guatemala on October \(31 .\) Although the ferocity of the winds decreased during the westward drift, the storm produced enormous amounts of precipitation, caused in part by the mountains of Central America. As moist air from both the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean to its south fed into Mitch, the stage was set for a disaster of epic proportions. Taking into account the orographic effects of the volcanic peaks of Central America and Mitch's slow movement, rain fell at a rate of 30 to 60 centimeters (12 to 24 inches) per day in many of the mountainous regions. Total rainfall of as much as nearly 2 meters ( 79 inches) was reported for the entire storm.

Describe other earth science phenomena where it is necessary to assimilate data on a regional scale to accurately determine patterns.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Geography Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free