Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the \(660-\mathrm{km}\) density discontinuity in the mantle corresponds to a compositional change with lighter rocks lying above more dense ones. Estimate the minimum decay time for a disturbance to this boundary. Assume \(\rho=\) \(4000 \mathrm{~kg} \mathrm{~m}^{-3}, \Delta \rho=100 \mathrm{~kg} \mathrm{~m}^{-3},\) and \(\mu=10^{21} \mathrm{~Pa} \mathrm{~s}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The minimum decay time is approximately \(1.02 \times 10^{14}\) seconds.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Parameters

We are given that the density of the mantle is \( \rho = 4000 \ \text{kg/m}^3 \), the change in density across the boundary is \( \Delta \rho = 100 \ \text{kg/m}^3 \), and the viscosity is \( \mu = 10^{21} \ \text{Pa} \cdot \text{s} \). These values will be used to calculate the minimum decay time for a disturbance in the boundary.
02

Formula for Decay Time

The decay time \( T \) for a disturbance in a fluid with a density discontinuity can be estimated using the formula: \[ T = \frac{1}{g} \times \left( \frac{\mu}{\Delta \rho \cdot d} \right) \] where \( g \) is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately \( 9.81 \ \text{m/s}^2 \)) and \( d \) is the depth of the boundary (assumed to be \( 660 \ \text{km} \) in our context, converted to meters as \( 660,000 \ \text{m} \)).
03

Substitute Given Values

Substitute the given values into the formula: \( \Delta \rho = 100 \ \text{kg/m}^3 \), \( \mu = 10^{21} \ \text{Pa} \cdot \text{s} \), \( d = 660,000 \ \text{m} \), and \( g = 9.81 \ \text{m/s}^2 \). Thus, the formula becomes: \[ T = \frac{1}{9.81} \times \left( \frac{10^{21}}{100 \times 660,000} \right) \]
04

Calculate the Decay Time

Perform the calculations: \[ T = \frac{1}{9.81} \times \left( \frac{10^{21}}{66,000,000} \right) \] \[ T = \frac{1}{9.81} \times 10^{14.803} \] \[ T \approx 1.02 \times 10^{14} \ \text{seconds} \] This is the estimated minimum decay time for a disturbance to this boundary.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Viscosity
Viscosity is a property that describes a fluid's resistance to flow. Think of it as the thickness or "stickiness" of a fluid. For instance, honey has a higher viscosity than water because it is thicker and flows more slowly.
In the Earth's mantle, viscosity is crucial because it affects how materials move within. High viscosity means any disturbances take longer to adjust. Here, we assume the viscosity \( \mu \) of the mantle is \( 10^{21} \mathrm{~Pa} \cdot \mathrm{s} \). This is a high value, indicating that the mantle material flows very slowly over time. Understanding viscosity helps predict how changes in the mantle affect movement and stability.
Density Change
Density change at the boundary, like the 660-km mantle discontinuity, significantly influences the movement within the mantle. Density refers to how much mass is packed into a given volume. When there is a density difference (\( \Delta \rho \)) between two layers, it can lead to interesting dynamic effects.
In the given exercise, the lighter rocks on top and the denser rocks below create a scenario where disturbances can occur at this transition. Here, \( \Delta \rho \) is \( 100 \ \text{kg/m}^3 \), showing a slight change from an overall density of \( 4000 \ \text{kg/m}^3 \). This density change could influence how gravity interacts with these layers at the discontinuity.
Decay Time Estimation
Decay time tells us how long it takes for a disturbance, like a shift or wave, within the mantle to settle back into equilibrium. Estimating decay time is crucial to understanding how the Earth's interior stabilizes after seismic or volcanic activities.
To estimate the decay time \( T \), we use the formula: \[ T = \frac{1}{g} \times \left( \frac{\mu}{\Delta \rho \cdot d} \right) \]This formula calculates how quickly a disturbance will diminish based on viscosity, density change, and the depth of the boundary affected. In this exercise, the calculation results in \( T \approx 1.02 \times 10^{14} \ \text{seconds} \), implying that these processes can take incredibly long periods, reflecting the slow dynamics of Earth's mantle changes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Derive expressions for the lifting torques on the top and bottom of a slab descending into the mantle with speed \(U\) at a dip angle of \(60^{\circ}\).

Show that the constant of integration \(A\) in the above postglacial rebound solution is given by $$A=-\left(\frac{\lambda}{2 \pi}\right)^{2} \frac{\rho g W_{m 0}}{2 \mu} e^{-t / \tau_{r}} . \quad(6-106)$$ Quantitative information on the rate of postglacial rebound can be obtained from elevated beach terraces. Wave action over a period of time erodes a beach to sea level. If sea level drops or if the land surface is elevated, a fossil beach terrace is created, as shown in Figure \(6-15 .\) The age of a fossil beach can be obtained by radioactive dating using carbon 14 in shells and driftwood. The elevations of a series of dated beach ter- races at the mouth of the Angerman River in Sweden are given in Figure \(6-16 .\) The elevations of these beach terraces are attributed to the postglacial rebound of Scandinavia since the melting of the ice sheet. The elevations have been corrected for changes in sea level. The uplift of the beach terraces is compared with the exponential time dependence given in Equation \((6-104)\). We assume that uplift began 10,000 years ago so that \(t\) is measured forward from that time to the present.

For an asthenosphere with a viscosity \(\mu=4 \times 10^{19} \mathrm{~Pa} \mathrm{~s}\) and a thickness \(h=200 \mathrm{~km},\) what is the shear stress on the base of the lithosphere if there is no counterflow \((\partial p / \partial x=0) ?\) Assume \(u_{0}=\) \(50 \mathrm{~mm} \mathrm{yr}^{-1}\) and that the base of the asthenosphere has zero velocity.

Suppose that convection extends through the entire mantle and that \(10 \%\) of the mean surface heat flow originates in the core. If the surface thermal boundary layer and the boundary layer at the core-mantle interface have equal thicknesses, how does the temperature rise across the lower mantle boundary layer compare with the temperature increase across the surface thermal boundary layer?

In the examples of folding just considered we assumed that the competent rock adhered to the incompetent rock. If the layers are free to slip, show that the wavelength of the most rapidly growing disturbance in an elastic layer of rock contained between two semi-infinite viscous fluids is given by $$\lambda=\pi h\left[E / \sigma\left(1-v^{2}\right)\right]^{1 / 2}$$ The free slip condition is equivalent to a zero shear stress condition at the boundaries of the elastic layer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Geography Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free