Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How would you expect trophic level biomass to change as the primary productivity of the community increases? Use your knowledge about hypotheses of community organization and discuss the assumptions underlying your predictions. Compare your expectations with those of Power (1992).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Biomass is expected to increase with higher primary productivity, but top-down controls (predator effects) can moderate this increase.

Step by step solution

01

Define Primary Productivity

Primary productivity is the rate at which energy is converted by photosynthetic and chemosynthetic autotrophs to organic substances. It forms the foundation of the food chain.
02

Understand Trophic Levels

Trophic levels represent the hierarchical levels in a food web, comprising producers at the base, followed by primary consumers (herbivores), and higher-level consumers (predators).
03

Theoretical Increase in Biomass

As primary productivity increases, the biomass at each trophic level is expected to increase due to the surplus energy available. More energy allows for growth and sustenance across trophic levels.
04

Ecological Theories and Assumptions

The trophic level biomass often follows the 'bottom-up control' hypothesis, where changes at the producer level affect all other levels. Assumptions include a stable ecosystem, efficient energy transfer, and that no other limiting factors (e.g., nutrient availability) inhibit growth.
05

Power's (1992) Perspective

According to Power (1992), while primary productivity can increase biomass, the system may also be influenced by 'top-down control,' where predators regulate the biomass of herbivores, indirectly affecting producers. This can stabilize or control the rate of change in biomass despite increased primary productivity.
06

Synthesizing Predictions

Primary productivity increases are generally assumed to increase biomass across trophic levels under bottom-up control. However, the structure of the community, particularly predator-prey dynamics as per Power's findings, must be considered, which may moderate these increases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Primary Productivity: The Foundation of Ecosystems
Primary productivity acts as the engine that drives ecosystem processes. It is the amount of energy converted by photosynthesizers, like plants and algae, from sunlight into chemical energy in the form of glucose. This serves as the foundation for virtually all life on Earth.

Energy from primary productivity enters the food web at the producer level, setting the stage for energy distribution up the trophic levels. This initial conversion is crucial for supporting autotrophs, which subsequently feed herbivores and carnivores higher up.

With increased primary productivity, ecosystems often witness a rise in biomass at all trophic levels as long as other conditions remain stable. This highlights the importance of maintaining healthy levels of primary productivity for sustaining biodiversity and ecological balance.
Community Organization: Understanding the Hierarchy
A community in ecological terms consists of all the different organisms that cohabit an area and interact within a structured framework of relationships. These relationships create a hierarchy known as trophic levels, organized typically in a food web format.

Plants and autotrophs occupy the lower levels as primary producers, while various layers of consumers (herbivores and predators) form subsequent tiers. The organization is essential to understand energy flow and nutrient cycling. Interactions among species can be complex and are influenced by factors including competition, predation, and various environmental pressures.

Understanding community organization allows scientists to predict how changes at one level can influence other levels, and it is foundational for managing ecosystems and conserving wildlife.
Bottom-Up Control: Energy Flow from Producers to Predators
Bottom-Up Control theory in ecology suggests that the abundance of organisms at each trophic level is regulated by the energy available from producers. When primary productivity increases, this usually ensures a more substantial flow of energy through the ecosystem, supporting more biomass at higher trophic levels.

This view assumes that ecosystems operate effectively, with no limiting factors obstructing this flow, such as nutrient deficiencies or habitat fragmentation. In stable conditions, increased energy at the producer level generally leads to increased populations of herbivores and, subsequently, predators.

While bottom-up control provides clarity in how ecosystems can expand based on energy availability, reality often sees more complicated interactions involving multiple regulatory forces.
Top-Down Control: Predators as Regulators
Top-Down Control emphasizes the role of predators in managing the population sizes of their prey, often leading to cascading effects throughout the food web. In some ecosystems, rather than the abundance of producers, it is the regulation by predators that determines trophic dynamics.

Predators help control the biomass of herbivores, allowing plants and autotrophs to maintain their population and health. This balance helps stabilize ecosystems, making them more resilient to changes in primary productivity.

Ecologists recognize that ecosystems often reflect a mix of both bottom-up and top-down controls. The dynamics between these forces are critical for understanding how ecosystems respond to changes such as increased primary productivity, climate variations, or human intervention.
Food Web Dynamics: Complexity Beyond Simple Chains
Food web dynamics illustrate the complexity of interactions among different species in an ecosystem. These dynamics go beyond simple linear food chains, presenting a network where a single species might have multiple dietary links.

Within these webs, transfers of energy and nutrients occur as organisms consume others for sustenance. The flow can be influenced by both bottom-up and top-down controls, as well as various external environmental factors.

Food webs provide a holistic picture of the ecosystem, showcasing interdependencies among species. They highlight how shifts, either from increased primary productivity or varying predator populations, ripple through the entire system. Understanding food web dynamics is essential for developing strategies to protect ecosystems and enhance biodiversity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In discussing the reality of trophic levels, Murdoch \((1966 a, p .219)\) states: Unlike populations, trophic levels are ill-defined and have no distinguishable lateral limits; in addition, tens of thousands of insect species, for example, live in more than one trophic level either simultaneously or at different stages of their life histories. Thus trophic levels exist only as abstractions, and unlike populations they have no empirically measurable properties or parameters. Discuss.

How would it be possible to have an inverted Eltonian pyramid of numbers in which, for example, the standing crop of large animals is larger than the standing crop of smaller animals? In what types of communities could this occur? Do Eltonian pyramids apply to both animals and plants? Del Giorgio et al. (1999) discuss these issues.

Population density (no. of individuals per \(\mathrm{m}^{2}\) ) of all organisms in all ecosystems falls with increasing body size, so that larger animals are less common. But for species of equal body size, aquatic organisms are \(10-20\) times more abundant in lakes than terrestrial organisms on land. Suggest two reasons why this might be. Cyr et al. (1997) discuss this issue.

Does any increase in primary production lead to an increase in herbivore grazing pressure, thus maintaining a low standing crop of plants? Discuss what ecological processes might prevent this from happening. Van de Koppel et al. (1996) discuss this question and provide data from a salt marsh grazed by hares, rabbits, and geese.

Could herbivores remove a high fraction of the net primary production in an ecosystem without depressing the standing crop of plants? How might this happen?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free