Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The species-area curve rises continually as area is increased, implying that there is no limit to the number of species in any community. Is this a correct interpretation? What hypotheses can you suggest to explain why the number of species rises as area increases?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The claim is incorrect; there is typically a limit to species numbers due to environmental factors. The rise in species with area is due to increased habitat diversity and reduced extinction rates.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Species-Area Relationship

To tackle the problem, we must first understand the species-area relationship. This relationship suggests that as the area surveyed increases, the number of species observed also increases. This is often represented by a species-area curve, which typically has a sigmoidal shape.
02

Interpreting the Curve

The claim that the curve implies no limit to the number of species relies on the assumption that the curve keeps rising indefinitely. However, the curve actually tends to plateau as it reaches a saturation point where additional area does not yield many new species. This plateau indicates a limit to the number of species based on environmental factors and available niches.
03

Evaluating Limitations

There are factors that set limits on species richness, such as habitat complexity, available resources, and geographical barriers. Even if areas are expanded, these factors can restrict the number of species that can thrive in a particular community, arguing against the unlimited species hypothesis.
04

Hypothesizing on Species Increase

As area increases, habitat diversity increases, which can support a greater variety of species. Larger areas may also reduce extinction rates and increase the probability of new species being discovered. An area effect hypothesis suggests that larger areas can sustain larger populations, reducing local extinctions.
05

Considering Alternative Hypotheses

The island biogeography model suggests that the balance of immigration and extinction rates influences species numbers. As area increases, so does the isolation of species, which affects these rates and could explain the increasing number of species with increasing area.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Species Richness
Species richness refers to the number of different species present in a particular area. It is a fundamental measure of biodiversity. The concept is crucial for understanding ecological dynamics because the greater the species richness, the more complex the ecosystem can be. Complex ecosystems can often be more resilient to disturbances.

Species richness is often influenced by a variety of factors like the area of the habitat, climate, and resources available. A larger area tends to house more species because it provides a wider range of resources and habitats, which can support more life. Furthermore, as areas increase in size, they often include more diverse microenvironments, leading to increased species richness.
  • Larger areas reduce the likelihood of extinction.
  • They provide more ecological niches for different species.
  • A variety of habitats allow for more specialized species to thrive.
Understanding species richness helps in conservation efforts because it indicates the health of ecosystems and can guide decisions in habitat preservation and restoration efforts.
Ecological Niches
Every species in an ecosystem has a specific role or position, known as its ecological niche. It encompasses the species' behavior, interactions with other species, and its place in the food web. Niches dictate how species adapt to, and interact with, their environment.

Ecological niches are highly significant because they help maintain balance within ecosystems. When there is a broad range of available niches, an ecosystem can accommodate a wide variety of species, increasing biodiversity. This variety in ecological roles can enhance the resilience and stability of an ecosystem.

More niches mean more species can find a unique niche to thrive in, without excessive competition. By exploiting a specific niche, a species minimizes competition and can coexist with others. In bigger or more complex habitats, such as those described by the species-area relationship, the diversity of niches typically increases:
  • Reduces direct competition among species.
  • Encourages specialization.
  • Facilitates species coexistence.
Thus, the availability of various ecological niches is central to explaining how larger and more diverse areas support higher species richness.
Island Biogeography
Island biogeography is a scientific theory that explains the distribution of species on islands and other isolated environments. Proposed by Robert MacArthur and E.O. Wilson, it considers the balance between two main processes: immigration and extinction of species.

The theory posits that larger islands near a mainland source attract more species due to their accessibility and size, which allows more niches and reduces local extinction rates. Conversely, smaller, isolated islands have fewer species due to higher extinction rates and lower immigration. For mainland ecosystems, this concept helps explain species distribution based on habitat fragmentation.

Using island biogeography, scientists can predict species richness based on:
  • Island or habitat size: Larger means more species.
  • Distance from the mainland: Closer means more immigration.
  • Habitat diversity: Diverse habitats support more complex ecosystems.
This theory underscores why larger areas tend to have more species: more microhabitats and niches support a layered ecological balance. Hence, understanding island biogeography aids in predicting changes in species richness with area size.
Habitat Diversity
Habitat diversity refers to the variety of different habitats within a given area. It is a key component of biodiversity. Greater habitat diversity typically supports a greater number of species, as each habitat can support different forms of life.

Imagine each habitat as offering unique resources and conditions. These variegated environments provide a plethora of niches and opportunities for different species to thrive. Consequently, as habitat diversity increases, so does species richness.

Habitat diversity is influenced by several factors:
  • Geological features that create varied topography.
  • Climate zones that create different environmental conditions.
  • Human activity that often alters habitats, either positively by creating new ecological niches or negatively by destroying them.
With more habitats, ecosystems become more complex, which often leads to increased numbers of species. Therefore, protecting habitat diversity is essential for maintaining the ecological balance and promoting biodiversity. Diverse habitats support not only more species but also more intricate interactions within the ecosystem.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Trophic cascades are weaker in terrestrial systems compared with aquatic ones (Hall et al. 2007 ). One suggested explanation for this difference is that differences in body size between plants and their herbivores could be responsible (Shurin et al. 2006 ). Discuss the relative size of plants and their herbivores in aquatic ecosystems and in terrestrial ecosystems, and speculate how these differences might affect trophic cascades.

Can nonequilibrium models of community organization be stable? Read Chesson and Case (1986) and DeAngelis and Waterhouse (1987) and discuss the relationship between stability and equilibrium/nonequilibrium concepts.

Freshwater lakes have been suggested to have two alternate stable states, one of clear water dominated by macrophytes and one of murky water with high phytoplankton levels. If this is correct, would you predict that measurement of the clarity of lake water for many lakes would be bimodal with a peak of lakes at the clear end of the spectrum and another peak of lakes at the murky end, with few lakes in between? Why might this prediction be incorrect? Peckham et al. (2006) did this analysis for Wisconsin lakes and discuss the results obtained from satellite measurement of lake transparency.

In western North American grasslands, bison (Bison bison ) and prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) are considered keystone herbivores. What changes would you predict in the plant community of these grasslands if you set up an experiment in which bison were excluded from some plots, prairie dogs from other plots, and both species from a third set of plots. Fahnestock and Detling (2002) did this experiment for three years and got no vegetation changes in any of the plots. Is this sufficient information to reject the idea that these herbivores are keystone species?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free