Chapter 3: Problem 19
A. NO CHANGE B. might of C. could of D. could
Short Answer
Expert verified
A) NO CHANGE
B) might of
C) could of
D) could
Explain your choice.
Step by step solution
01
Evaluate Option A
Inspect option A (NO CHANGE) to see if it fits the context and is grammatically correct. If the original sentence is already correct, there is no need to change it.
02
Evaluate Option B
Inspect option B (might of) and determine if it is grammatically correct and suitable for the context. If it is not, eliminate this option.
03
Evaluate Option C
Inspect option C (could of) and consider whether it is grammatically correct and suitable for the context. If it is not, eliminate this option as well.
04
Evaluate Option D
Inspect option D (could) and determine its grammatical correctness and suitability for the context. If it is correct and no other option is suitable, then this option should be selected. If it is also incorrect, compare the remaining options and select the best one.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Standard English Conventions
Navigating the pathways of standard English conventions is crucial for clear, effective communication. These conventions include everything from punctuation and spelling to sentence structure and verb tenses. It's a set of rules that provides consistency in written language, making it easier for readers to understand the message.
In the ACT English grammar context, these conventions are tested to ensure students can recognize and apply them correctly. For example, understanding the correct use of 'have' rather than the often misheard 'of' following modal verbs like 'could' or 'might'. Adhering to these standards helps maintain clarity and professionalism in writing.
In the ACT English grammar context, these conventions are tested to ensure students can recognize and apply them correctly. For example, understanding the correct use of 'have' rather than the often misheard 'of' following modal verbs like 'could' or 'might'. Adhering to these standards helps maintain clarity and professionalism in writing.
Grammar Correctness
Grammar correctness is at the heart of effectively communicating ideas in written English. It comprises the correct use of verb forms, subject-verb agreement, proper noun and pronoun usage, and other syntactic elements. Ensuring grammatical accuracy helps prevent misunderstandings and lends credibility to the writer.
Upon evaluation, phrases such as 'might of' or 'could of' are incorrect because 'of' is a preposition that cannot serve the role of a verb. In standard written English, the auxiliary 'have' is required to form the perfect aspect when used with modals like 'might' or 'could'. Therefore, maintaining grammatical correctness would lead you to dismiss options 'might of' and 'could of' as incorrect.
Upon evaluation, phrases such as 'might of' or 'could of' are incorrect because 'of' is a preposition that cannot serve the role of a verb. In standard written English, the auxiliary 'have' is required to form the perfect aspect when used with modals like 'might' or 'could'. Therefore, maintaining grammatical correctness would lead you to dismiss options 'might of' and 'could of' as incorrect.
Contextual Sentence Structure
Understanding the contextual sentence structure is about grasping how sentence components come together to convey meaning within a specific context. It involves recognizing not just the grammatical correctness of each part, but also appreciating how word choice and sequence impact readability and interpretive clarity.
Within a given context, the difference between 'could' as a standalone modal verb and 'could have' (often contracted to 'could've' and misheard as 'could of') can completely change the meaning of a sentence. It's essential to evaluate sentence structure within its context to ensure it logically conveys the intended message. This skill takes practice but is pivotal for mastering ACT English grammar.
Within a given context, the difference between 'could' as a standalone modal verb and 'could have' (often contracted to 'could've' and misheard as 'could of') can completely change the meaning of a sentence. It's essential to evaluate sentence structure within its context to ensure it logically conveys the intended message. This skill takes practice but is pivotal for mastering ACT English grammar.