Question

In stating that the two papers' publication "animates the debate" (line 58 ), Andreae suggests that the papers A) generated an unresolvable controversy. B) energized a diminishing effort. C) created interest in a dry subject. D) presented seemingly contradictory evidence.

Short answer

Option B: energized a diminishing effort.

Step-by-step solution

Read and understand the context

Read the given context carefully and understand that the two papers' publication "animates the debate." Keep in mind that the debate here is a key aspect to understand what Andreae meant.

Analyze the options

Consider each option and think about how it may relate to the context. Option A suggests that the papers generated an unresolvable controversy. This option implies that the papers may have introduced controversial aspects that cannot be resolved. However, it doesn't necessarily imply that the debate was "animated" or energized. Option B suggests that the papers energized a diminishing effort. This option could be a reasonable interpretation as it implies that the debate was given a new energy or life due to the papers. Option C suggests that the papers created interest in a dry subject. This option may imply that the debate was uninteresting before the papers were published, and their publication ignited interest in the debate. Option D suggests that the papers presented seemingly contradictory evidence. This option implies that the papers presented different perspectives or evidence, which may have caused confusion or increased discussions in the debate.

Choose the most appropriate option

From the analysis of the options, the most suitable interpretation of Andreae's statement that the two papers' publication "animates the debate" would be Option B. The publication of the papers "energized a diminishing effort," implying that the papers brought new life into the debate, which may have been losing momentum prior to the papers being published.

Key concepts

Reading Comprehension

When tackling SAT critical reading passages, understanding the context is crucial. "Reading comprehension" is more than just processing words; it involves grasping the underlying ideas and themes presented. To enhance this skill, try to:

• Focus on the overall meaning of the passage, not just individual words or lines.
• Identify the main ideas and supporting details.
• Pay attention to tone and style, as they can provide insights into the author's intent.

By grasping the core concepts, you'll be better equipped to understand the significance behind statements, such as Andreae's comment about animating the debate in the original exercise.

Question Analysis

Analyzing questions is a pivotal part of SAT critical reading. It requires discerning what the question demands. This involves:

• Identifying keywords and phrases that guide you toward what is being asked.
• Understanding the relationship between the question and the passage. This helps in linking what Andreae's statement actually signifies in context.
• Breaking questions into manageable parts, so your focus remains clear and directed.

Consider each option carefully. Ask yourself how it connects with the main concepts. Skills in "question analysis" lead to more precise and confident answers.

Test Preparation

Effective test preparation goes beyond memorizing vocabulary or skimming through practice questions. Instead, focus on holistic strategies that improve comprehension and decision-making:

• Develop a regular reading habit with varied topics. This enhances vocabulary and broadens understanding.
• Take practice tests under timed conditions to build stamina and time management skills.
• Review answers, especially incorrect ones, to understand any misunderstandings or recurring patterns.

A well-rounded "test preparation" plan helps in approaching each question methodically, ensuring the best chances of success.

Answer Choice Evaluation

Evaluating answer choices is an art that requires balancing critical reading skills with logical reasoning. Here's how to do it effectively:

• Eliminate obviously wrong choices first. This narrows your focus and makes the decision-making process easier.
• Consider the nuances in wording. Subtle differences can hint at the correct answer, as seen in evaluating whether the publication "energized" or "created interest" in the debate.
• Refer back to the passage to check if the selected answer truly aligns with the author's intent or the context given.

"Answer choice evaluation" demands attentiveness and a sound understanding of the passage, ensuring that your choice is the most justified one.