Question

Both authors would most likely agree that any social changes undertaken to fight poverty would be A) likely to completely solve the problems of financial inequality. B) a stopgap measure needed to prevent the wealthy from keeping their money. C) unsuccessful without a drastic change in the mindset of the poor. D) partial solutions that would present new sets of challenges.

Short answer

Based on the content and tone of the given statements, both authors would most likely agree that any social changes undertaken to fight poverty would be D) "Partial solutions that would present new sets of challenges."

Step-by-step solution

Interpret the choices

Carefully read and understand each of the given options: A) Likely to completely solve the problems of financial inequality. B) A stopgap measure needed to prevent the wealthy from keeping their money. C) Unsuccessful without a drastic change in the mindset of the poor. D) Partial solutions that would present new sets of challenges.

Evaluate the given statements

Analyze the implications of each statement: A) This statement suggests that both authors believe that social changes can "completely" solve financial inequality. This implies a strong, positive stance on the effectiveness of such measures. B) This option states that the social changes are temporary measures to prevent wealth accumulation, which might not necessarily address the root causes of poverty. C) This choice implies that any social change would be unsuccessful if the mindset of the poor does not change drastically, emphasizing the importance of changing attitudes alongside policy changes. D) The final option suggests that any social changes would be partial solutions and would introduce new challenges, acknowledging that these measures are not perfect and might require additional adjustments.

Choose the most appropriate answer

Based on the content and tone of the given statements, choose the most appropriate answer that represents what both authors would most likely agree upon. In this case, option D) "Partial solutions that would present new sets of challenges" seems to be the most reasonable answer, as it acknowledges the potential benefits of social changes and also highlights that they are not perfect solutions and might introduce new challenges. This statement appears to be a more balanced viewpoint that both authors might agree with, compared to the other statements which lean too strongly either in favor or against social changes.

Key concepts

SAT Reading Comprehension

SAT reading comprehension is a crucial skill that tests your ability to understand and interpret written passages. This skill is often assessed through questions that ask for the main idea, the purpose of the passage, or details about specific parts of the text. In the context of the exercise based on authors' perspectives regarding social changes to alleviate poverty, this involves understanding implications and subtleties beyond just the surface-level reading.

To master SAT reading comprehension, focus on the following strategies:

• Identify the main ideas by summarizing each paragraph briefly.
• Understand the author’s tone and purpose; are they supportive, critical, or neutral?
• Pay close attention to transitional phrases that indicate shifts in argument or emphasis.
• Look for contextual clues to infer meanings of unfamiliar words or phrases.

These skills enable you to interpret complex questions that require an understanding of not just what is written, but also what is implied.

Argument Analysis

Argument analysis involves dissecting a text to understand the arguments presented and how they are constructed. In tests like the SAT, this means evaluating statements and determining what the authors truly mean or would likely agree with.

For instance, with the provided exercise, you're analyzing authorial positions on the effectiveness of social change measures. This requires:

• Dissecting the structure of the argument to see the claims and evidence used.
• Identifying assumptions behind each statement to understand deeper implications.
• Critical thinking to weigh both sides or perspectives provided in the passage.
• Understanding potential biases or viewpoints that might skew the argument.

Using these skills, you can effectively discern which answer choice most accurately reflects the authors' perspectives, as demonstrated by the step-by-step solution provided.

Multiple Choice Strategy

Effective multiple choice strategy is essential for selecting the correct option among several possibilities. In reading comprehension exercises, each choice must be evaluated for its alignment with the passage's content and tone. Strategies to tackle these questions successfully include:

• Elimination process: Remove obviously incorrect or extreme answer choices first.
• Keyword matching: Identify key terms that appear in both the question and passage.
• Focus on nuances: Subtleties in language often discriminate the correct choice from closely related options.
• Time management: Allocate your time wisely, ensuring not to linger too long on any one question.

Using these strategies in the exercise, option D was chosen because it acknowledges complexity and partiality, which aligns closely with what both authors are likely to agree upon, as opposed to more absolute or simplistic solutions.

Answer Choice Evaluation

Answer choice evaluation means thoroughly assessing each option to determine which answer best fits the context of the passage and the question asked. This involves more than surface-level reading, demanding an evaluation of the likelihood, feasibility, and realism of each choice.

In the presented exercise, here's how you might evaluate each:

• Option A posits a total resolution, which is often unrealistic in complex issues like poverty.
• Option B suggests temporary measures targeting the wealthy, which might not align with the authors' wider discussions.
• Option C centers on changing the mindset of the poor, introducing a different approach to solution effectiveness.
• Option D, chosen as the best answer, is balanced, recognizing limitations while also highlighting the creation of additional challenges.

Such detailed evaluation allows for a more informed decision, ensuring that your choice accurately reflects the nuanced views presented in the passage.