Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What conclusion is supported by this statement about the interpretation of the Constitution? A. A document that needs amendments is not a reliable guide for government policy. B. A document that can be reinterpreted is not an adequate method for resolving legal questions. C. A text that causes controversy does more harm than good. D. Interpretations of the Constitution can change, which in turn affect decisions made by lawmakers.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D is the most supported conclusion, as it directly refers to the statement's idea that changing interpretations of the Constitution can influence lawmakers' decisions.

Step by step solution

01

Consider the statement

The key element in this exercise is to consider the implications of the interpretations of the Constitution and how they can influence government decisions. This statement suggests that changes in interpretations can have a direct impact on the decisions made by lawmakers.
02

Evaluate Option A

Option A states that a document that needs amendments is not a reliable guide for government policy. This option discusses the reliability of a document that needs amendments but does not directly relate to the statement about the interpretation of the Constitution affecting lawmakers' decisions.
03

Evaluate Option B

Option B states that a document that can be reinterpreted is not an adequate method for resolving legal questions. Although this option seems more relevant than option A, it focuses on the adequacy of reinterpretation to resolve legal questions, rather than the influence of interpretation on lawmakers' decisions.
04

Evaluate Option C

Option C states that a text that causes controversy does more harm than good. This option focuses on the impact of controversy, rather than the effect of interpretations of the Constitution on lawmakers' decisions.
05

Evaluate Option D

Option D states that interpretations of the Constitution can change, which in turn affect decisions made by lawmakers. This option directly refers to the statement's idea that changing interpretations of the Constitution can influence lawmakers' decisions, making it the best match.
06

Choose the best conclusion

After evaluating all four options, we can conclude that Option D is the best match and is most supported by the statement about the interpretation of the Constitution given in the exercise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Considering only these 5 bird types, what was the total percentage increase in sightings from 2008 to 2009? (Round your answer to the nearest integer.) A. 7% B. 8% C. 14% D. 18%

The passage indicates that the volunteers followed the same diet during each two-week period of the study. Why was this important? A. Had the volunteers varied their diets throughout the study, the differences in urine production may have been attributable to differences in solid food consumption, rather than in liquid consumption. B. Had the volunteers varied their diets throughout the study, they may have craved different amounts of liquid each week. C. By eating the same foods each week, the volunteers ensured that they did not suffer from any nutritional imbalances throughout the study. D. By feeding the volunteers the same foods each week, the scientist ensured that the volunteers produced that same amount of urine as each other per day.

How does the Negative build the argument that the Affirmative’s position is incorrect? A. The Negative brings up alternative city models that the Affirmative fails to acknowledge. B. The Negative denies the Affirmative’s assertion that general city government is in need of reform. C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative. D. The Negative demonstrates that the Affirmative is uninformed about the true workings of city government.

The above quote supports the conclusion that, after the Watergate scandal, President Nixon A. was forced to leave office after being impeached by the Congress. B. resigned before completing his term of office. C. appointed Vice President Ford as interim president. D. continued on as full-time president, despite pressure from Congress.

384 conference attendees need to take tour shuttles into the city. If each bus can carry a maximum of 26 passengers, then what is the minimum number of shuttle trips required to transport all the passengers?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free