Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How does the Negative build the argument that the Affirmative’s position is incorrect? A. The Negative brings up alternative city models that the Affirmative fails to acknowledge. B. The Negative denies the Affirmative’s assertion that general city government is in need of reform. C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative. D. The Negative demonstrates that the Affirmative is uninformed about the true workings of city government.

Short Answer

Expert verified
C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative.

Step by step solution

01

Read all the options

Carefully read each of the given options (A to D) and understand their meaning.
02

Identify which option provides evidence to refute the Affirmative's argument

Look for the option which directly contradicts the Affirmative's position by presenting evidence against it.
03

Choose the best option to answer the question

According to the analysis, the best choice will be the one that describes how the Negative brings up evidence to refute the Affirmative's argument. In this case, the best choice is: C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment. It involves evaluating data, facts, observable phenomena, and research findings to form a logical conclusion. In the context of debate, critical thinking is paramount. When viewers think critically in a debate, they must consider the arguments of both the Affirmative and Negative positions with skepticism, assessing the validity of the arguments presented before making a decision.

Applying Critical Thinking in Debates

Using the provided exercise as a reference, a student must dissect the argument and strategically identify the strengths and weaknesses. For instance, when the Negative challenges the selection of cities used by the Affirmative as evidence, a person engaging in critical thinking would assess whether this criticism undermines the credibility of the samples and therefore, the validity of the Affirmative’s broader argument. To improve one's critical thinking skills, students should practice questioning the reliability and relevance of information, considering opposing viewpoints, and seeking out additional evidence that may support or refute an argument.
Evidence Evaluation
Evidence evaluation involves examining the quality and relevance of information used to support an argument. In educational debate strategy, evaluating evidence is crucial to strengthen one’s stance or discredit an opponent's claims. The process requires an understanding of how evidence should be gathered, presented, and interpreted.

Key Steps in Evaluating Evidence

  • Source credibility - Is the evidence from a reliable and authoritative source?
  • Accuracy - Does the information presented align with other known facts or data?
  • Relevance - Does the evidence directly support or refute the claim?
  • Bias - Is the evidence presented in an unbiased manner?
  • Timeliness - Is the information up-to-date?
In the context of the provided exercise, the Negative's strategy entails questioning the pertinence and representativeness of the cities chosen by the Affirmative. A student evaluating evidence would delve into whether those cities accurately reflect the issue at hand or if they have been cherry-picked to support a specific conclusion.
Logic and Reasoning
Logic and reasoning are the processes of forming a coherent and consistent set of beliefs based on evidence and well-grounded principles. In a debate, logic is used to construct arguments, while reasoning is applied to deduce conclusions from premises that are presumed to be true.

Components of Sound Reasoning

  • Premises - Statements that form the basis of the argument.
  • Inference - The process of deriving logical conclusions from premises.
  • Conclusion - The final assertion that the argument aims to establish as true.
Strong logical reasoning means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. In our exercise, the Negative's argument falls within this definition: by challenging the examples provided by the Affirmative, the Negative implies that if the evidence (cities) presented does not accurately represent the issue, then the Affirmative's conclusion about the need for city government reform cannot be logically sustained. Students can bolster their logic and reasoning skills by consistently practicing constructing arguments with well-founded premises and deducing conclusions that follow logically from those premises.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The balanced equation below represents the oxidation process for propane. $$ \mathrm{C}_3 \mathrm{H}_8+5 \mathrm{O}_2 \rightarrow 3 \mathrm{CO}_2+4 \mathrm{H}_2 \mathrm{O} $$ Which of the following describes the reaction shown above? A. Oxygen reacts with propane to create carbon dioxide and water. B. Oxygen and propane react to create water. C. Oxygen is converted into carbon dioxide. D. Propane is converted into water.

Read this sentence from paragraph 8. All of which is very depressing, and makes one want to renounce joking and lead a better life. Why does the author conclude the essay with this sentence? A. to show that the methods of comic storytelling are counterproductive B. to give insight into the mental state of the author and instill empathy in the reader C. to subtly criticize humorous storytelling as immoral D. to give an alternative to the career of a professional storyteller

Mass is an indicator of the amount of matter that an object possesses. Scientists determine the weight of an object by multiplying its mass by the acceleration that the object experiences due to gravity. The acceleration due to gravity on the moon is approximately \(\frac{1}{6}\) the acceleration due to gravity on the earth. Based on the information above, a person would have

If a represents the point on the larger circle with the greatest y-value, and if b represents the point on the smaller circle with the least y-value, then what is the distance from point a to point b? A. 2 B. 4 C. 6 D. 8

With improvements in technology, production becomes more efficient, increasing the output per worker of a given industry. Product quality rises, profits and wages increase, and the economy improves overall. In short, both workers and employers benefit. Which of the following opinions contradicts the above conclusion about improvements in technology? A. New technology will cause companies to decrease the size of their workforce in order to cut costs. B. Product quality increases consumer satisfaction, which leads to greater company profits. C. When businesses succeed, more money is reinvested into the economy. D. Efficiency is a key factor in ensuring a business's success.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free