Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

How does the Negative build the argument that the Affirmative’s position is incorrect? A. The Negative brings up alternative city models that the Affirmative fails to acknowledge. B. The Negative denies the Affirmative’s assertion that general city government is in need of reform. C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative. D. The Negative demonstrates that the Affirmative is uninformed about the true workings of city government.

Short Answer

Expert verified
C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative.

Step by step solution

01

Read all the options

Carefully read each of the given options (A to D) and understand their meaning.
02

Identify which option provides evidence to refute the Affirmative's argument

Look for the option which directly contradicts the Affirmative's position by presenting evidence against it.
03

Choose the best option to answer the question

According to the analysis, the best choice will be the one that describes how the Negative brings up evidence to refute the Affirmative's argument. In this case, the best choice is: C. The Negative calls into question the use of the sample cities presented by the Affirmative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment. It involves evaluating data, facts, observable phenomena, and research findings to form a logical conclusion. In the context of debate, critical thinking is paramount. When viewers think critically in a debate, they must consider the arguments of both the Affirmative and Negative positions with skepticism, assessing the validity of the arguments presented before making a decision.

Applying Critical Thinking in Debates

Using the provided exercise as a reference, a student must dissect the argument and strategically identify the strengths and weaknesses. For instance, when the Negative challenges the selection of cities used by the Affirmative as evidence, a person engaging in critical thinking would assess whether this criticism undermines the credibility of the samples and therefore, the validity of the Affirmative’s broader argument. To improve one's critical thinking skills, students should practice questioning the reliability and relevance of information, considering opposing viewpoints, and seeking out additional evidence that may support or refute an argument.
Evidence Evaluation
Evidence evaluation involves examining the quality and relevance of information used to support an argument. In educational debate strategy, evaluating evidence is crucial to strengthen one’s stance or discredit an opponent's claims. The process requires an understanding of how evidence should be gathered, presented, and interpreted.

Key Steps in Evaluating Evidence

  • Source credibility - Is the evidence from a reliable and authoritative source?
  • Accuracy - Does the information presented align with other known facts or data?
  • Relevance - Does the evidence directly support or refute the claim?
  • Bias - Is the evidence presented in an unbiased manner?
  • Timeliness - Is the information up-to-date?
In the context of the provided exercise, the Negative's strategy entails questioning the pertinence and representativeness of the cities chosen by the Affirmative. A student evaluating evidence would delve into whether those cities accurately reflect the issue at hand or if they have been cherry-picked to support a specific conclusion.
Logic and Reasoning
Logic and reasoning are the processes of forming a coherent and consistent set of beliefs based on evidence and well-grounded principles. In a debate, logic is used to construct arguments, while reasoning is applied to deduce conclusions from premises that are presumed to be true.

Components of Sound Reasoning

  • Premises - Statements that form the basis of the argument.
  • Inference - The process of deriving logical conclusions from premises.
  • Conclusion - The final assertion that the argument aims to establish as true.
Strong logical reasoning means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. In our exercise, the Negative's argument falls within this definition: by challenging the examples provided by the Affirmative, the Negative implies that if the evidence (cities) presented does not accurately represent the issue, then the Affirmative's conclusion about the need for city government reform cannot be logically sustained. Students can bolster their logic and reasoning skills by consistently practicing constructing arguments with well-founded premises and deducing conclusions that follow logically from those premises.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following equations represents the line that passes through the two given points? A. \(y=2 x-14\) B. \(y=2 x+3\) C. \(y=-x-1\) D. \(y=-x+1\)

Scientists use the following formula to calculate the force of gravity that two objects exert on each other: In the equation $$ F=\frac{G \times M \times m}{r^2} $$ \(F\) is the force of gravity; \(G\) is a constant; \(M\) is the mass of one of the objects; \(m\) is the mass of the second object; \(r\) is the distance between the centers of the objects. If an object with a given mass \(m\) is replaced by an object of half its mass, which of the following will increase the force of gravity? A. increasing mass \(M\) and doubling the distance between the objects B. reducing mass \(M\) and doubling the distance between the objects C. reducing mass \(M\) and halving the distance between the objects D. increasing mass \(M\) and halving the distance between the objects

The passage below is incomplete. For each “Select” option, choose the option that correctly completes the sentence. (For this practice test, circle your selection.) September 20, 2011 Ms. Celine Margot Chair, AIM Foundation 1235 Deer Park Road Rochester, NY Dear Ms. Margot, I was so honored to meet you last week at the AIM Foundation Benefit. When I walked in the door, I had no idea I was about to be introduced to a Phi Kappa sister: Although, I should not really have been surprised; the members of our sorority their works of charity. I was touched to hear the outreach that AIM is doing, helping poor villages in several countries have access to clean water. Clearly, your foundation has a commitment to bettering the lives of those communities who live closest to subsistence level. As we discussed that night, my company, Clear Image, has great experience helping organizations we have been at the forefront of social media and viral image marketing and during that time the clients we have had range from Fortune 500 companies to philanthropic fraternities. We produce content highlighting your activities via blogs and user collect news reports with a bearing on your organization’s goals. After we connected at the fundraiser, it occurred to me that with AIM approaching 10 whole years of community service, the time would be right for a major media push touting AIM’s accomplishments to date. We have, in fact, initiated special media events for several companies. As AIM’s 10th anniversary nears, your board of directors has probably been considering ways to make that anniversary special. To that end, I suggest we meet so that I could present some of the promotional work we have done and give you a sense of the nuances of what handle the celebration of “10 Years of AIM.” Feel free to call me at 748-555-2398 if you’d like to explore how Clear Image can make AIM more prominent in the world of philanthropy. Yours truly, Misha Ayakusi Coordinator, Philanthropy & Social Service Image Enhancement

What conclusion is supported by this statement about the interpretation of the Constitution? A. A document that needs amendments is not a reliable guide for government policy. B. A document that can be reinterpreted is not an adequate method for resolving legal questions. C. A text that causes controversy does more harm than good. D. Interpretations of the Constitution can change, which in turn affect decisions made by lawmakers.

What was the mode of the average monthly rainfall for the months shown above? A. 40 B. 45 C. 50 D. 55

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free