Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal in landfills and incineration plants, report that disposable plastics make up an ever- increasing percentage of the waste they handle. It is clear that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away in the garbage are failing. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Because plastics create harmful pollutants when burned, an increasing percentage of the plastics handled by waste management companies are being disposed of in landfills. (B) Although many plastics are recyclable, most of the plastics disposed of by waste management companies are not. (C) People are more likely to save and reuse plastic containers than containers made of heavier materials like glass or metal. (D) An increasing proportion of the paper, glass, and metal cans that waste management companies used to handle is now being recycled. (E) While the percentage of products using plastic packaging is increasing, the total amount of plastic being manufactured has remained unchanged.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Choice D potentially weakens the argument by offering an alternative explanation for increased plastic percentages.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the conclusion of the argument

The conclusion of the argument claims that efforts to reduce the amount of disposable plastic in garbage are failing. This is based on the observation that disposable plastics form an increasing percentage of waste handled by waste management companies.
02

Analyze each choice to find its effect

We'll consider how each choice impacts the conclusion. - **Choice A**: This talks about disposal methods for plastics, not the total amount or percentage of plastics, so it does not affect the conclusion. - **Choice B**: While it points to a lack of recyclability, it supports the idea that plastics are not being reduced in garbage, aligning with the argument. - **Choice C**: This suggests people reuse plastic containers more than other materials, but doesn't provide data on overall waste trends, thus not weakening the argument. - **Choice D**: This mentions increased recycling of other materials, which means the percentage of plastics might increase simply because other materials are decreasing, not because more plastics are being disposed of. This has the potential to weaken the argument. - **Choice E**: Indicates static production of plastics despite increased packaging, leading to no net increase; however, it does not directly contravene the argument's claim about disposal rates.
03

Select the option that most weakens the argument

**Choice D** is the most effective at weakening the argument. It provides an alternative explanation that the increasing percentage of plastics in waste is due to a decrease in the amount of other materials like paper, glass, and metal being handled by waste management companies because these are being recycled more. Thus, plastics might just account for a larger percentage without an actual increase in waste plastics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking involves the ability to objectively analyze and evaluate an argument or problem. It is essential in situations where you need to understand complex issues, like the disposal of waste materials. Critical thinking helps in assessing the validity of conclusions drawn from given premises. For instance, when analyzing the effectiveness of reducing plastic waste, critical thinking allows you to distinguish between raw data and manipulated numbers that might suggest misleading trends.
Applying critical thinking requires questioning evidence, examining assumptions, discerning hidden values, and evaluating the logic behind claims. It's not just about finding faults but also about understanding the depth of the problem and recognizing where improvements can be made.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis is a core skill in logical reasoning, especially useful for LSAT logical reasoning sections. In waste management contexts, it involves breaking down arguments to assess their structure and validity. The first step is identifying the argument's conclusion and the evidence supporting it.
Understanding this process helps you evaluate whether the premises actually support the conclusion. For example, the statement that reducing plastic waste efforts are failing must be analyzed with context. When the argument is examined closely, as shown in Step 2 of the solution, you can see why the choice that highlights increased recycling of other materials (Choice D) weakens the argument. Thus, argument analysis not only aids in understanding but also in identifying what could be improved or further investigated.
Logical Reasoning Skills
Logical reasoning skills are vital in evaluating and constructing arguments. These skills ensure that you can follow a line of reasoning and see where potential flaws could lie.
The solution to the given problem illustrates logical reasoning by systematically considering various scenarios that could weaken or support the main argument—that reducing plastic waste efforts are not effective. Logical reasoning involves deducing conclusions from premises, recognizing contradictions, and considering alternative explanations. By developing these skills, one becomes adept at understanding complex arguments and predicting implications and consequences, a useful skill in both academic and real-world scenarios.
Waste Management
Waste management is an essential part of environmental conservation and sustainability efforts. It involves the collection, transportation, processing, and disposal of waste materials in ways that minimize their environmental impact.
In the exercise provided, waste management companies report increasing percentages of plastic waste—highlighting both a challenge and an opportunity in sustainability. Understanding waste management also means recognizing how statistics can sometimes be misinterpreted or misrepresented. When analyzing waste trends, it's crucial to consider various factors, such as changes in recycling habits, population growth, or shifts in material usage, which may affect observed trends in waste composition.
Effective waste management strategies focus on reducing, reusing, and recycling materials to decrease the amount going to landfills and incineration. By improving these strategies, society can better manage waste and address the growing concerns related to plastic pollution.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It might seem that an airline could increase profits by reducing airfares on all its flights in order to encourage discretionary travel and thus fill planes. Offers of across-the-board discount fares have, indeed, resulted in the sale of large numbers of reduced-price tickets. Nevertheless such offers have, in the past, actually cut the airline's profits. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above? (A) Fewer than 10 percent of all air travelers make no attempt to seek out discount fares. (B) Fares for trips between a large city and a small city are higher than those for trips between two large cities even when the distances involved are the same. (C) Across-the-board discounts in fares tend to decrease revenues on flights that are normally filled, but they fail to attract passengers to unpopular flights. (D) Only a small number of people who have never before traveled by air are persuaded to do so on the basis of across-the-board discount fares. (E) It is difficult to devise an advertising campaign that makes the public aware of across-the-board discount fares while fully explaining the restrictions applied to those discount fares.

The author uses the example of the Steadicam \({ }^{\mathrm{TM}}\) primarily in order to suggest that (A) the filming of performances should not be limited by inadequate equipment (B) new technologies do not need to be very complex in order to benefit art (C) the interaction of a traditional art form with a new technology will change attitudes toward technology in general (D) the replacement of a traditional technology with a new technology will transform definitions of a traditional art form (E) new technology does not so much preempt as enhance a traditional art form

English and the Austronesian language Mbarbaram both use the word "dog" for canines. These two languages are unrelated, and since speakers of the two languages only came in contact with one another long after the word "dog" was first used in this way in either language, neither language could have borrowed the word from the other. Thus this case shows that sometimes when languages share words that are similar in sound and meaning the similarity is due neither to language relatedness nor to borrowing. The argument requires that which one of the following be assumed? (A) English and Mbarbaram share no words other than "dog." (B) Several languages besides English and Mbarbaram use "dog" as the word for canines. (C) Usually when two languages share a word, those languages are related to each other. (D) There is no third language from which both English and Mbarbaram borrowed the word "dog." (E) If two unrelated languages share a word, speakers of those two languages must have come in contact with one another at some time.

Most of the ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's atmosphere from the Sun is absorbed by the layer of stratospheric ozone and never reaches the Earth's surface. Between 1969 and 1986 , the layer of stratospheric ozone over North America thinned, decreasing by about 3 percent. Yet, the average level of ultraviolet radiation measured at research stations across North America decreased over the same period. Which one of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparently discrepant facts described above? (A) Ultraviolet radiation increases the risk of skin cancer and cataracts; the incidence of skin cancer and cataracts increased substantially between 1969 and 1986. (B) Between 1969 and 1986, the layer of stratospheric ozone over Brazil thinned, and the average level of ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's surface in Brazil increased. (C) Manufactured chlorine chemicals thin the layer of stratospheric ozone. (D) Ozone pollution, which absorbs ultraviolet radiation, increased dramatically between 1969 and 1986. (E) Thinning of the layer of stratospheric ozone varies from one part of the world to another and from year to year.

A local group had planned a parade for tomorrow, but city hall has not yet acted on its application for a permit. The group had applied for the permit well in advance, had made sure their application satisfied all the requirements, and was clearly entitled to a permit. Although the law prohibits parades without a permit, the group plans to proceed with its parade. The group's leader defended its decision by appealing to the principle that citizens need not refrain from actions that fail to comply with the law if they have made a good-faith effort to comply but are prevented from doing so by government inaction. Which one of the following actions would be justified by the principle to which the leader of the group appealed in defending the decision to proceed? (A) A chemical-processing company commissioned an environmental impact report on its plant. The report described foul odors emanating from the plant but found no hazardous wastes being produced. Consequently, the plant did not alter its processing practices. (B) A city resident applied for rezoning of her property so that she could build a bowling alley in a residential community. She based her application on the need for recreational facilities in the community. Her application was turned down by the zoning board, so she decided to forego construction. (C) The law requires that no car be operated without a certain amount of insurance coverage. But since the authorities have been unable to design an effective procedure for prosecuting owners of cars that are driven without insurance, many car owners are allowing their insurance to lapse. (D) A real-estate developer obtained a permit to demolish a historic apartment building that had not yet been declared a governmentally protected historic landmark. Despite the protests of citizens' groups, the developer then demolished the building. (E) A physician who had been trained in one country applied for a license to practice medicine in another country. Although he knew he met all the qualifications for this license, he had not yet received it one year after he applied for it. He began to practice medicine without the license in the second country despite the law's requirement for a license.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free