Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Data from satellite photographs of the tropical rain forest in Melonia show that last year the deforestation rate of this environmentally sensitive zone was significantly lower than in previous years. The Melonian government, which spent millions of dollars last year to enforce laws against burning and cutting of the forest, is claiming that the satellite data indicate that its increased efforts to halt the destruction are proving effective. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the government's claim? (A) Landowner opposition to the government's antideforestation efforts grew more violent last year in response to the increased enforcement. (B) Rainfall during the usually dry 6-month annual burning season was abnormally heavy last year. (C) Government agents had to issue fines totaling over \(\$ 9\) million to 3,500 violators of burning-and-cutting regulations. (D) The inaccessibility of much of the rain forest has made it impossible to confirm the satellite data by direct observation from the field. (E) Much of the money that was designated last year for forest preservation has been spent on research and not on enforcement.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option B undermines the claim because heavy rainfall, not enforcement, could reduce deforestation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument's Claim

The argument's claim is that the reduced deforestation rate is due to the Melonian government's increased enforcement of laws against burning and cutting the forest.
02

Determine What Would Undermine the Claim

To undermine the claim, we need evidence suggesting that factors other than government enforcement were responsible for the reduced deforestation rate.
03

Evaluate Option B

Option B states that there was abnormally heavy rainfall during the usually dry burning season. This could prevent deforestation by making it difficult to set fires, an independent factor unrelated to government efforts.
04

Justify Why Option B Undermines the Claim

If the reduced deforestation rate was due to heavy rainfall rather than the government's enforcement efforts, then the claim that enforcement is effective is weakened.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Deforestation
Deforestation represents a significant environmental issue, especially in regions like the tropical rainforests of Melonia. It involves the large-scale removal of trees, affecting biodiversity, climate, and many species' habitats. The Melonian rainforest, being an environmentally sensitive area, plays a crucial role in air quality and carbon absorption. When these forests are destroyed, it disrupts these ecological services.

Often, deforestation is driven by agriculture, logging, and urban expansion. In Melonia, the practice of burning forests leads to increased deforestation rates. The government’s efforts to reduce these rates are crucial for maintaining ecological balance. This also ties into efforts globally to combat climate change.

Understanding deforestation's impact is vital for developing strategies to mitigate its effects. Better enforcement of laws and sustainable forest management practices are essential steps toward conserving these vital resources.
Environmental Policy
Environmental policy refers to the principles and regulations set forth by governments and organizations to protect the natural environment. In the case of Melonia, the government has implemented policies aimed at reducing deforestation through law enforcement. Such policies are crucial for ensuring sustainable development and ecological conservation.

The Melonian government allocated significant funds to enforce regulations against illegal burning and logging. This shows a commitment to combating deforestation. However, effective policy also requires monitoring and adapting to changes in environmental conditions.

Successful environmental policies often include:
  • Clear, actionable regulations.
  • Enforcement measures including fines or penalties for violators.
  • Involvement of local communities and stakeholders.
  • Adapting strategies based on scientific data and environmental changes.
Without these elements, even well-funded initiatives may not achieve their intended goals.
Argument Evaluation
Evaluating arguments, like assessing the Melonian government’s claim about reduced deforestation, involves critical examination of facts and explanations. In logical reasoning, arguments are assessed based on their premises and the conclusions drawn from them.

In this example, the government claims that their enforcement led to reduced deforestation. Evaluating this claim requires identifying alternative explanations or evidence that could undermine this conclusion. For instance, abnormally heavy rainfall (Option B) during the burning season suggests another reason for reduced deforestation that is unrelated to government actions.

Effective argument evaluation involves:
  • Identifying the main claim and supporting evidence.
  • Looking for alternative explanations or factors.
  • Determining the strength and relevance of each piece of evidence.
This can help in understanding whether the argument holds or needs reconsideration.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to analyze facts, generate and organize ideas, defend opinions, make comparisons, draw inferences, evaluate arguments and solve problems. It’s an essential skill in evaluating claims like those made by the Melonian government regarding deforestation.

Engaging in critical thinking means not accepting claims at face value. Always question the assumptions, analyze the evidence, and consider all potential counterarguments. Given the tropical rainforest situation, questioning if heavy rainfall, rather than enforcement, led to reduced deforestation is a result of critical thinking.

To enhance critical thinking skills, try to:
  • Ask probing questions.
  • Seek out additional information or perspectives.
  • Reflect on your own biases and assumptions.
  • Engage in discussions that challenge your viewpoints.
These practices allow for a deeper understanding and better decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Criticism that the press panders to public sentiment neglects to consider that the press is a profit-making institution. Like other private enterprises, it has to make money to survive. If the press were not profit-making, who would support it? The only alternative is subsidy and, with it, outside control. It is easy to get subsidies for propaganda, but no one will subsidize honest journalism. It can be properly inferred from the passage that if the press is (A) not subsidized, it is in no danger of outside control (B) not subsidized, it will not produce propaganda (C) not to be subsidized, it cannot be a profit-making institution (D) to produce honest journalism, it must be a profit-making institution (E) to make a profit, it must produce honest journalism Questions 14-15 Lucien: Public-housing advocates claim that the many homeless people in this city are proof that there is insufficient housing available to them and therefore that more low-income apartments are needed. But that conclusion is absurd. Many apartments in my own building remain unrented and my professional colleagues report similar vacancies where they live. Since apartments clearly are available, homelessness is not a housing problem. Homelessness can, therefore, only be caused by people's inability or unwillingness to work to pay the rent. Maria: On the contrary, all recent studies show that a significant percentage of this city's homeless people hold regular jobs. These are people who lack neither will nor ability.

Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the evolutionary theory that dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than to other classes of animals. Fossils show that some dinosaurs had hollow bones a feature found today only in warm-blooded creatures, such as birds, that have a high metabolic rate. Dinosaurs had well-developed senses of sight and hearing, which is not true of present-day cold-blooded creatures like reptiles. The highly arched mouth roof of some dinosaurs would have permitted them to breathe while eating, as fast-breathing animals, such as birds, need to do. Today, all fast-breathing animals are warm-blooded. Finally, fossils reveal that many dinosaurs had a pattern of growth typical of warmblooded animals. The argument in the passage proceeds by (A) attempting to justify one position by demonstrating that an opposing position is based on erroneous information (B) establishing a general principle that it then uses to draw a conclusion about a particular case (C) dismissing a claim made about the present on the basis of historical evidence (D) assuming that if all members of a category have a certain property then all things with that property belong to the category (E) presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one rather than the other of two present-day phenomena

Balance is particularly important when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. Facts must not be deliberately manipulated to show one party in a favorable light, and the views of each side should be fairly represented. This concept of balance, however, does not justify concealing or glossing over basic injustices in an effort to be even-handed. If all the media were to adopt such a perverse interpretation of balanced reporting, the public would be given a picture of a world where each party in every conflict had an equal measure of justice on its side, contrary to our experience of life and, indeed, our common sense. Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument? (A) Balanced reporting presents the public with a picture of the world in which all sides to a conflict have equal justification. (B) Balanced reporting requires impartially revealing injustices where they occur no less than fairly presenting the views of each party in a conflict. (C) Our experience of life shows that there are indeed cases in which conflicts arise because of an injustice, with one party clearly in the wrong. (D) Common sense tells us that balance is especially needed when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. (E) Balanced reporting is an ideal that cannot be realized, because judgments of balance are necessarily subjective.

Purebred dogs are prone to genetically determined abnormalities. Although such abnormalities often can be corrected by surgery, the cost can reach several thousand dollars. Since nonpurebred dogs rarely suffer from genetically determined abnormalities, potential dog owners who want to reduce the risk of incurring costly medical bills for their pets would be well advised to choose nonpurebred dogs. Which one of the following if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Most genetically determined abnormalities in dogs do not seriously affect a dog's general well-being. (B) All dogs, whether purebred or nonpurebred, are subject to the same common nongenetically determined diseases. (C) Purebred dogs tend to have shorter natural life spans than do nonpurebred dogs. (D) The purchase price of nonpurebred dogs tends to be lower than the purchase price of purebred dogs. (E) A dog that does not have genetically determined abnormalities may nevertheless have offspring with such abnormalities.

The author mentions which one of the following as evidence for the eighteenth- century English attitude toward Parliament? (A) The English had become uncomfortable with institutions that could claim absolute authority. (B) The English realized that their interests were better guarded by Parliament than by the King. (C) The English allowed Parliament to make constitutional changes by legislative enactment. (D) The English felt that the King did not possess the knowledge that would enable him to rule responsibly. (E) The English had decided that it was time to reform their representative government.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free