Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Balance is particularly important when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. Facts must not be deliberately manipulated to show one party in a favorable light, and the views of each side should be fairly represented. This concept of balance, however, does not justify concealing or glossing over basic injustices in an effort to be even-handed. If all the media were to adopt such a perverse interpretation of balanced reporting, the public would be given a picture of a world where each party in every conflict had an equal measure of justice on its side, contrary to our experience of life and, indeed, our common sense. Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument? (A) Balanced reporting presents the public with a picture of the world in which all sides to a conflict have equal justification. (B) Balanced reporting requires impartially revealing injustices where they occur no less than fairly presenting the views of each party in a conflict. (C) Our experience of life shows that there are indeed cases in which conflicts arise because of an injustice, with one party clearly in the wrong. (D) Common sense tells us that balance is especially needed when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. (E) Balanced reporting is an ideal that cannot be realized, because judgments of balance are necessarily subjective.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option B is the correct answer.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument discusses the importance of balanced reporting in civil conflicts, emphasizing that while balance involves presenting both sides, it should not excuse ignoring injustices. It warns against the misinterpretation that balance means all sides are equally justified.
02

Identify the Keywords

Focus on terms like 'balanced reporting', 'manipulated facts', 'favorable light', 'fair representation', and 'basic injustices'. These will guide us in identifying the core message the author is trying to convey.
03

Analyze Each Option

Evaluate each option to see which captures the essence of the argument. Option A emphasizes equal justification, but the argument refutes this idea; Option C reflects life's experience revealing injustices in conflicts, aligning with the argument but focusing narrowly; Option D highlights balance in reporting, but doesn't touch on justifications; Option E suggests subjective balance, which is not discussed.
04

Select the Correct Answer

Option B states, 'Balanced reporting requires impartially revealing injustices where they occur no less than fairly presenting the views of each party in a conflict.' This matches the argument’s point that balance should not overlook injustices while presenting each side fairly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Balanced Reporting
Balanced reporting is a fundamental principle in journalism that seeks to present news in an impartial way.
When applied to civil conflicts, balanced reporting becomes even more critical, as it helps to ensure that the public receives an accurate picture of the situation.

Here are a few key points about balanced reporting:
  • Both sides of a conflict must be represented fairly, ensuring no party is shown as more justified than the other unless evidence clearly necessitates this distinction.
  • Balanced reporting does not mean ignoring facts or glossing over injustices to appear neutral.
  • Failing to report significant injustices or skewing facts can lead to a false sense of equality between conflicting parties. This misrepresentation could misinform the public about the true nature of the conflict.
This concept ensures that audiences are provided with a well-rounded view without artificially equating opposing parties or oversimplifying complex issues.
Civil Conflicts Analysis
Civil conflicts analysis involves a detailed examination of internal strife within a nation. Understanding the root causes and dynamics of civil conflicts is crucial for journalists, analysts, and policymakers alike.
By analyzing these conflicts, we can:
  • Identify the underlying causes of the conflict, which may include issues like ethnic tensions, resource allocation, or political power struggles.
  • Recognize the stakeholders involved and understand their perspectives and grievances in depth.
  • Evaluate the impacts of the conflict on civilians and the broader society.
  • Explore possible resolutions or de-escalations and their implications for the future.
In-depth civil conflicts analysis allows for a more informed public that can better understand the complexities and nuances of these issues, rather than relying on oversimplified or biased reports.
Argument Evaluation
Argument evaluation is an essential skill in logical reasoning, especially when analyzing statements about complex issues like civil conflicts.
To evaluate an argument effectively, consider:
  • Understanding the main claim or thesis the argument is trying to support. For example, in the concept of balanced reporting, the main argument is that balance shouldn't overshadow the necessity of highlighting injustices.
  • Identifying the premises and evidence used to support the argument. Checking these elements for validity and sufficiency is crucial.
  • Seeing if any assumptions have been made that could affect the argument's strength, and whether these assumptions are reasonable.
  • Being able to identify fallacies or biases, such as presenting a false equivalence or omitting crucial information.
By honing argument evaluation skills, you not only understand the viewpoint presented but also critically assess its cogency and relevance.
Critical Thinking in Media
Critical thinking in the media context means applying careful judgment to evaluate news stories and reports, especially on contentious topics like civil conflicts.
This involves:
  • Questioning the validity and sources of the information being presented.
  • Assessing whether the piece maintains ethical standards, such as truthfulness, accuracy, and fairness.
  • Investigating the motivations behind a report's narrative - asking whether it aims to inform or persuade, and whether it might be promoting any bias.
  • Weighing the potential effects of the reporting on public perception and understanding of the conflict.
By engaging in critical thinking, readers can better navigate the media they consume. This is particularly important in conflicts where various sides may present differing narratives, and recognition of these differences is key to understanding the fuller picture.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Certain instruments used in veterinary surgery can be made either of stainless steel or of nylon. In a study of such instruments, 50 complete sterilizations of a set of nylon instruments required \(3.4\) times the amount of energy used to manufacture that set of instruments, whereas 50 complete sterilizations of a set of stainless steel instruments required \(2.1\) times the amount of energy required to manufacture that set of instruments. If the statements above are true, each of the following could be true EXCEPT: (A) The 50 complete sterilizations of the nylon instruments used more energy than did the 50 complete sterilizations of the stainless steel instruments. (B) More energy was required for each complete sterilization of the nylon instruments than was required to manufacture the nylon instruments. (C) More nylon instruments than stainless steel instruments were sterilized in the study. (D) More energy was used to produce the stainless steel instruments than was used to produce the nylon instruments. (E) The total cost of 50 complete sterilizations of the stainless steel instruments was greater than the cost of manufacturing the stainless steel instruments.

In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents - rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide. Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll's prediction was inaccurate? (A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents. (B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population. (C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today. (D) No effort was made to determine the respondents' political affiliations. (E) Because the poll asked only for respondents' candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.

People who accuse the postal service of incompetence and inefficiency while complaining of the proposed five-cent increase in postal rates do not know a bargain when they see one. Few experiences are more enjoyable than reading a personal letter from a friend. Viewed in this way, postal service is so underpriced that a five-cent increase is unworthy of serious debate. The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument (A) suggests that the postal service is both competent and efficient, but does not establish how competence and efficiency should be measured (B) claims that the proposed increase is insignificant but does not say at what level the increase would be worthy of serious debate (C) confuses the value of the object delivered with the value of delivering that object (D) appeals to an outside authority for support of a premise that should be established by argument (E) fails to establish whether or not the critics of the postal service are employees of the postal service

The author mentions which one of the following as evidence for the eighteenth- century English attitude toward Parliament? (A) The English had become uncomfortable with institutions that could claim absolute authority. (B) The English realized that their interests were better guarded by Parliament than by the King. (C) The English allowed Parliament to make constitutional changes by legislative enactment. (D) The English felt that the King did not possess the knowledge that would enable him to rule responsibly. (E) The English had decided that it was time to reform their representative government.

Lucien's argument against the public-housing advocates' position is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms? (A) It offers no justification for dismissing as absurd the housing advocates' claim that there are many homeless people in the city. (B) It treats information acquired through informal conversations as though it provided evidence as strong as information acquired on the basis of controlled scientific studies. (C) It responds to a claim in which "available" is used in the sense of "affordable" by using "available" in the sense of "not occupied." (D) It overlooks the possibility that not all apartment buildings have vacant apartments for rent. (E) It fails to address the issue, raised by the public-housing advocates' argument, of who would pay for the construction of more low-income housing.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free