Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Journalist: Can you give me a summary of the novel you are working on? Novelist: Well, I assume that by "summary" you mean something brief and not a version of the novel itself. The reason I write novels is that what I want to communicate can be communicated only in the form of a novel. So I am afraid I cannot summarize my novel for you in a way that would tell you what I am trying to communicate with this novel. Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is most parallel to that used by the novelist? (A) Only if a drawing can be used as a guide by the builder can it be considered a blueprint. This drawing of the proposed building can be used as a guide by the builder, so it can be considered a blueprint. (B) Only a statement that does not divulge company secrets can be used as a press release. This statement does not divulge company secrets, but it is uninformative and therefore cannot be used as a press release. (C) Watching a travelog is not the same as traveling. But a travelog confers some of the benefits of travel without the hardships of travel. So many people just watch travelogs and do not undergo the hardships of travel. (D) Only a three-dimensional representation of a landscape can convey the experience of being in that landscape. A photograph taken with a traditional camera is not three-dimensional. Therefore a photograph taken with a traditional camera can never convey the experience of being in a landscape. (E) A banquet menu foretells the content of a meal, but some people collect menus in order to remind themselves of great meals they have eaten. Thus a banquet menu has a function not only before, but also after, a meal has been served.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (D) due to form necessity parallelism.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Novelist's Reasoning

The novelist suggests that their novels cannot be summarized because what they intend to communicate can only be expressed in the form of a novel itself. Hence, any form of summarization would fail to capture their intended message.
02

Identify Requirements for Parallel Reasoning

To find a reasoning pattern similar to the novelist's, we are looking for an answer choice where effective communication or representation of an idea requires a specific format or medium, and that any different format or medium would fail to capture the essence fully.
03

Analyze Option (A)

Option (A) talks about a drawing being considered a blueprint only if it can be used as a guide by the builder. This does not match the reasoning pattern because it talks about practical functionality rather than necessity of form for communication.
04

Analyze Option (B)

Option (B) involves the non-disclosure of company secrets for a statement to qualify as a press release. The reason provided is related to content security, not about form or medium of communication like in the novelist's reasoning.
05

Analyze Option (C)

Option (C) contrasts watching a travelog with actually traveling. While it explains the benefits of travelogs, it does not argue that travelogs are necessary for communication. Hence, this option does not match the reasoning pattern.
06

Analyze Option (D)

Option (D) states that only three-dimensional representations can convey the experience of being in a landscape. A two-dimensional photograph cannot fulfill this role. This mirrors the novelist's idea that only the novel form can communicate their intended message.
07

Analyze Option (E)

Option (E) discusses the function of a banquet menu both before and after a meal. This is about dual functionality rather than communication necessity, so it differs from the novelist's reasoning pattern.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Analytical Thinking
Analytical thinking is a critical skill when tackling logical reasoning exercises like the one presented here. It involves systematically breaking down complex problems to understand the underlying structures and relationships. The goal is to identify patterns and connections that might not be immediately obvious.

In the given exercise, we're looking at how the novelist articulates their inability to provide a summary. This involves identifying the reasoning structure which suggests that a novel's complexity and intended message can only be communicated through its complete narrative form. Analytical thinking helps us decipher that main point: the necessity of a specific format for conveying an idea.

Using analytical thinking, you examine each answer choice to see if it aligns with this reasoning pattern. This breaks down into steps: define the original argument, understand the core of its reasoning, and then apply this understanding to evaluate the choices. Sharpening this skill is crucial not only for test prep but also for understanding the nuances in everyday problem-solving.
Reasoning Patterns
Recognizing reasoning patterns is akin to spotting the blueprint behind an argument. It's about understanding how different pieces of information are interconnected to form a cohesive argument.

In this exercise, the novelist's reasoning follows a specific pattern: the necessity of a particular medium to fully convey a message. This same structure can be applied to other scenarios where the form is indispensable for true representation or communication.

Option (D) resonates with the pattern because it claims only a three-dimensional medium can convey a landscape's experience perfectly. The task is to identify the equivalence in the logic or argument structure, not just the content. By systematically analyzing the options, we unearth the parallels in reasoning that enhance our understanding of logical statements.
LSAT Preparation
Preparing for the LSAT involves mastering logical reasoning, which is a core component of the test. Exercises like this one are typical of the questions you might encounter, designed to assess your ability to analyze, compare, and evaluate arguments effectively.

Here, you need to determine which option reflects the same reasoning structure as the reasoning in the initial exchange about novel summarization. This requires attention to detail and an understanding of how arguments are constructed.

LSAT preparation includes practicing these types of problems, developing strategies for identifying key reasoning patterns, and honing analytical skills to swiftly and accurately deduce the correct answers. Building a strong foundation in recognizing argument patterns not only aids in reasoning sections but also benefits overall performance on the test. Regular practice, reviewing solutions, and understanding the logic behind correct answers are essential steps in your LSAT prep journey.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Advertisement: Northwoods Maple Syrup, made the old-fashioned way, is simply tops for taste. And here is the proof: in a recent market survey, 7 out of every 10 shoppers who expressed a preference said that Northwoods was the only maple syrup for them, no ifs, ands, or buts. Of the following, which one is the strongest reason why the advertisement is potentially misleading? (A) The proportion of shoppers expressing no preference might have been very small. (B) Other brands of maple syrup might also be made the old-fashioned way. (C) No market survey covers more than a sizable minority of the total population of consumers. (D) The preference for the Northwoods brand might be based on such a factor as an exceptionally low price. (E) Shoppers who buy syrup might buy only maple syrup.

Tall children can generally reach high shelves easily. Short children can generally reach high shelves only with difficulty. It is known that short children are more likely than are tall children to become short adults. Therefore, if short children are taught to reach high shelves easily, the proportion of them who become short adults will decrease. A reasoning error in the argument is that the argument (A) attributes a characteristic of an individual member of a group to the group as a whole (B) presupposes that which is to be proved (C) refutes a generalization by means of an exceptional case (D) assumes a causal relationship where only a correlation has been indicated (E) takes lack of evidence for the existence of a state of affairs as evidence that there can be no such state of affairs

It might seem that an airline could increase profits by reducing airfares on all its flights in order to encourage discretionary travel and thus fill planes. Offers of across-the-board discount fares have, indeed, resulted in the sale of large numbers of reduced-price tickets. Nevertheless such offers have, in the past, actually cut the airline's profits. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above? (A) Fewer than 10 percent of all air travelers make no attempt to seek out discount fares. (B) Fares for trips between a large city and a small city are higher than those for trips between two large cities even when the distances involved are the same. (C) Across-the-board discounts in fares tend to decrease revenues on flights that are normally filled, but they fail to attract passengers to unpopular flights. (D) Only a small number of people who have never before traveled by air are persuaded to do so on the basis of across-the-board discount fares. (E) It is difficult to devise an advertising campaign that makes the public aware of across-the-board discount fares while fully explaining the restrictions applied to those discount fares.

English and the Austronesian language Mbarbaram both use the word "dog" for canines. These two languages are unrelated, and since speakers of the two languages only came in contact with one another long after the word "dog" was first used in this way in either language, neither language could have borrowed the word from the other. Thus this case shows that sometimes when languages share words that are similar in sound and meaning the similarity is due neither to language relatedness nor to borrowing. The argument requires that which one of the following be assumed? (A) English and Mbarbaram share no words other than "dog." (B) Several languages besides English and Mbarbaram use "dog" as the word for canines. (C) Usually when two languages share a word, those languages are related to each other. (D) There is no third language from which both English and Mbarbaram borrowed the word "dog." (E) If two unrelated languages share a word, speakers of those two languages must have come in contact with one another at some time.

Politician: From the time our party took office almost four years ago the number of people unemployed city-wide increased by less than 20 percent. The opposition party controlled city government during the four preceding years, and the number of unemployed city residents rose by over 20 percent. Thus, due to our leadership, fewer people now find themselves among the ranks of the unemployed, whatever the opposition may claim. The reasoning in the politician's argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that (A) the claims made by the opposition are simply dismissed without being specified (B) no evidence has been offered to show that any decline in unemployment over the past four years was uniform throughout all areas of the city (C) the issue of how much unemployment in the city is affected by seasonal fluctuations is ignored (D) the evidence cited in support of the conclusion actually provides more support for the denial of the conclusion (E) the possibility has not been addressed that any increase in the number of people employed is due to programs supported by the opposition party

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free