Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

English and the Austronesian language Mbarbaram both use the word "dog" for canines. These two languages are unrelated, and since speakers of the two languages only came in contact with one another long after the word "dog" was first used in this way in either language, neither language could have borrowed the word from the other. Thus this case shows that sometimes when languages share words that are similar in sound and meaning the similarity is due neither to language relatedness nor to borrowing. The argument requires that which one of the following be assumed? (A) English and Mbarbaram share no words other than "dog." (B) Several languages besides English and Mbarbaram use "dog" as the word for canines. (C) Usually when two languages share a word, those languages are related to each other. (D) There is no third language from which both English and Mbarbaram borrowed the word "dog." (E) If two unrelated languages share a word, speakers of those two languages must have come in contact with one another at some time.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D: There is no third language from which both English and Mbarbaram borrowed "dog."

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument's Main Point

The argument claims that the similarity between the word "dog" in English and Mbarbaram is neither due to language relatedness nor borrowing between the two languages.
02

Recognize the Assumption's Role

To support the claim that the similarities in the word "dog" between English and Mbarbaram are not due to borrowing or relatedness, an assumption must fill the gap in reasoning that could otherwise suggest another source for this similarity.
03

Analyze Each Option

Evaluate each provided option to determine which one strengthens the argument by ensuring that no other possibility (such as a common source language) explains why "dog" is used in both English and Mbarbaram.
04

Eliminate Irrelevant Choices

Consider Option A, B, C, and E: All these options either introduce unrelated information or imply conditions that do not directly strengthen the argument, such as sharing words beyond "dog" or historical interaction between speakers.
05

Focus On Option D

Option D states that there is no third language from which both languages borrowed the word "dog." By assuming this, the argument is strengthened because it eliminates the possibility that a shared third source language is the reason for the similarity, thus supporting the argument’s conclusion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Language Borrowing
When it comes to languages, borrowing words is a common phenomenon. This happens when one language takes words from another due to cultural or social interaction. The borrowed word usually assimilates into the borrowing language's grammar and pronunciation rules. For example, English has borrowed several terms from Latin and French over the centuries.
  • Borrowed words can enrich a language by adding new vocabulary.
  • This process often occurs in regions where different language groups interact closely.
  • Sometimes, borrowed words retain their original meanings, while other times, they might evolve differently in the borrowing language.
Language borrowing implies some degree of connection or contact between the groups of speakers. So, when two unrelated languages share a word, as with English and Mbarbaram with "dog," borrowing as an explanation requires historical contact which was absent here, ruling out this possibility.
Unrelated Languages
Languages are often grouped into families based on common ancestral languages. For instance, Spanish and Italian are both Romance languages stemming from Latin. In contrast, unrelated languages do not share such direct common ancestry, despite possibly developing independently similar structures or words.
  • Recognizing language relationships typically involves examining both vocabulary and grammar.
  • Unrelated languages can still develop similarities due to coincidental developments or parallel evolution.
  • These similarities often arise in basic vocabulary as humans experience similar needs globally.
In our exercise, English and Mbarbaram are described as unrelated, indicating their vocabulary similarities are not due to shared ancestry. This must be confirmed to support the statement that neither borrowed nor inherited the word "dog" from a shared ancestor.
Argument Assumption
An assumption in logical reasoning serves as an unstated premise or belief that underpins the argument's conclusion. The argument in our exercise hinges on the idea that the word "dog" in English and Mbarbaram has no connection beyond coincidence.
  • The argument assumes there is no common third language both might have borrowed from.
  • Evaluating assumptions helps identify any implicit reliance on unmentioned factors.
  • Critical examination of these assumptions is key to either strengthening or refuting the argument.
Option D is pivotal in affirming that no third language provided the term "dog," thus strengthening the conclusion by excluding alternative sources and supporting the argument’s original claim of unrelated development.
Austronesian Languages
Austronesian languages form a family with over a thousand languages spoken across Southeast Asia, Madagascar, the Pacific Islands, and parts of continental Asia. This vast group showcases a broad range of linguistic features and diverse cultures.
  • Austronesian languages are known for their shared linguistic roots, which are often reflected in their vocabulary and grammatical structures.
  • Mbarbaram, despite being noted as an Austronesian language, shares specific vocabulary with non-Austronesian languages like English in unique cases.
  • Analysis of Austronesian languages provides insights into language evolution, borrowing, and development.
The exercise's mention of Mbarbaram as Austronesian underscores the intriguing nature of the linguistic coincidence with English. Such studies highlight the unpredictable nature of language development and interaction, even among distinct linguistic families.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the evolutionary theory that dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than to other classes of animals. Fossils show that some dinosaurs had hollow bones a feature found today only in warm-blooded creatures, such as birds, that have a high metabolic rate. Dinosaurs had well-developed senses of sight and hearing, which is not true of present-day cold-blooded creatures like reptiles. The highly arched mouth roof of some dinosaurs would have permitted them to breathe while eating, as fast-breathing animals, such as birds, need to do. Today, all fast-breathing animals are warm-blooded. Finally, fossils reveal that many dinosaurs had a pattern of growth typical of warmblooded animals. The argument in the passage proceeds by (A) attempting to justify one position by demonstrating that an opposing position is based on erroneous information (B) establishing a general principle that it then uses to draw a conclusion about a particular case (C) dismissing a claim made about the present on the basis of historical evidence (D) assuming that if all members of a category have a certain property then all things with that property belong to the category (E) presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one rather than the other of two present-day phenomena

In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents - rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide. Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll's prediction was inaccurate? (A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents. (B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population. (C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today. (D) No effort was made to determine the respondents' political affiliations. (E) Because the poll asked only for respondents' candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.

Journalist: Can you give me a summary of the novel you are working on? Novelist: Well, I assume that by "summary" you mean something brief and not a version of the novel itself. The reason I write novels is that what I want to communicate can be communicated only in the form of a novel. So I am afraid I cannot summarize my novel for you in a way that would tell you what I am trying to communicate with this novel. Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is most parallel to that used by the novelist? (A) Only if a drawing can be used as a guide by the builder can it be considered a blueprint. This drawing of the proposed building can be used as a guide by the builder, so it can be considered a blueprint. (B) Only a statement that does not divulge company secrets can be used as a press release. This statement does not divulge company secrets, but it is uninformative and therefore cannot be used as a press release. (C) Watching a travelog is not the same as traveling. But a travelog confers some of the benefits of travel without the hardships of travel. So many people just watch travelogs and do not undergo the hardships of travel. (D) Only a three-dimensional representation of a landscape can convey the experience of being in that landscape. A photograph taken with a traditional camera is not three-dimensional. Therefore a photograph taken with a traditional camera can never convey the experience of being in a landscape. (E) A banquet menu foretells the content of a meal, but some people collect menus in order to remind themselves of great meals they have eaten. Thus a banquet menu has a function not only before, but also after, a meal has been served.

Lucien's argument against the public-housing advocates' position is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms? (A) It offers no justification for dismissing as absurd the housing advocates' claim that there are many homeless people in the city. (B) It treats information acquired through informal conversations as though it provided evidence as strong as information acquired on the basis of controlled scientific studies. (C) It responds to a claim in which "available" is used in the sense of "affordable" by using "available" in the sense of "not occupied." (D) It overlooks the possibility that not all apartment buildings have vacant apartments for rent. (E) It fails to address the issue, raised by the public-housing advocates' argument, of who would pay for the construction of more low-income housing.

A poor farmer was fond of telling his children: "In this world, you are either rich or poor, and you are either honest or dishonest. All poor farmers are honest. Therefore, all rich farmers are dishonest." The farmer's conclusion is properly drawn if the argument assumes that (A) every honest farmer is poor (B) every honest person is a farmer (C) everyone who is dishonest is a rich farmer (D) everyone who is poor is honest (E) every poor person is a farmer

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free