Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the evolutionary theory that dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than to other classes of animals. Fossils show that some dinosaurs had hollow bones a feature found today only in warm-blooded creatures, such as birds, that have a high metabolic rate. Dinosaurs had well-developed senses of sight and hearing, which is not true of present-day cold-blooded creatures like reptiles. The highly arched mouth roof of some dinosaurs would have permitted them to breathe while eating, as fast-breathing animals, such as birds, need to do. Today, all fast-breathing animals are warm-blooded. Finally, fossils reveal that many dinosaurs had a pattern of growth typical of warmblooded animals. The argument in the passage proceeds by (A) attempting to justify one position by demonstrating that an opposing position is based on erroneous information (B) establishing a general principle that it then uses to draw a conclusion about a particular case (C) dismissing a claim made about the present on the basis of historical evidence (D) assuming that if all members of a category have a certain property then all things with that property belong to the category (E) presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one rather than the other of two present-day phenomena

Short Answer

Expert verified
(E) presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one rather than the other of two present-day phenomena.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Argument Structure

The passage provides evidence that suggests dinosaurs may not be more closely related to reptiles but rather to warm-blooded animals like birds. It mentions hollow bones, well-developed senses, breathing patterns, and growth patterns typical of warm-blooded animals. This suggests a reevaluation of the classification of dinosaurs.
02

Evaluating the Argument Options

Analyze each option to understand how the argument is being presented: - Option (A) suggests justifying a position by showing another position is incorrect, but the passage doesn't explicitly demonstrate errors of the opposing view. - Option (B) involves stating a general principle to apply to a specific case, which doesn't match the passage's approach. - Option (C) involves dismissing present claims with historical evidence, which isn't the core tactic used. - Option (D) suggests an assumption that common properties indicate complete category inclusion, which is not how the passage argues. - Option (E) suggests drawing similarities between past phenomena and one of two present possibilities, aligning closely with how the passage presents evidence.
03

Selecting the Best Argument Option

The passage presents evidence to show that dinosaurs share several characteristics with warm-blooded creatures rather than cold-blooded reptiles. Therefore, the passage attempts to draw similarities between past dinosaurs and present-day warm-blooded animals rather than cold-blooded reptiles.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Evolutionary Theory
Evolutionary theory is essentially the framework that explains how species change over time through various processes like natural selection, mutation, and genetic drift. It is rooted in the idea that all species are connected through common ancestry, leading to new species diversifying from one another over geological timescales.

In the context of the exercise, we explore how new fossil evidence introduces the need to possibly rethink the evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and other animals. Traditionally, dinosaurs have been considered more closely related to reptiles. However, findings such as hollow bones and other warm-blooded characteristics open up debates about their classification.
  • Natural selection: Process where traits that enhance survival and reproduction become more common in successive generations.
  • Phylogenetics: Study of evolutionary relationships, essential for understanding classifications.
By examining evolutionary theory, scientists not only understand past life forms but can also track how modern species have evolved over time.
Fossil Evidence
Fossils are remnants or impressions of ancient organisms preserved in rock, giving us a glimpse into Earth's biological past. They offer physical evidence that supports or challenges existing evolutionary theories. In this exercise, fossil evidence has become a crucial factor in reconsidering the relationship between dinosaurs and reptiles.

These fossils reveal characteristics such as hollow bones and unique growth patterns that hint at warm-blooded properties. Such features are significant because they are uncommon among modern reptiles but are present in birds, suggesting a closer relationship with avian species.
  • Preservation: Fossils are typically formed in sedimentary rock layers over millions of years.
  • Types: Body fossils (bones, shells) and trace fossils (footprints, burrows).
Fossil evidence often serves as a key tool in piecing together the evolutionary history of extinct species and understanding their connections to living organisms.
Warm-Blooded Animals
Warm-blooded animals, also known as endotherms, maintain a stable internal body temperature regardless of external conditions. This physiological trait allows for high metabolic rates and sustained activity in cold environments, typical in birds and mammals.

In relation to dinosaurs, the discovery of characteristics often associated with warm-blooded animals triggers a reevaluation of their metabolic classification. Such traits include their capacity for fast breathing and evidence of an arched mouth roof similar to modern fast-breathing birds.
  • Metabolic rate: Endotherms have a high metabolism to support active lifestyles.
  • Temperature regulation: They have mechanisms to retain heat, ensuring vital physiological processes continue without disruption.
This raises fascinating questions about how dinosaurs may have thrived, perhaps indicating a more bird-like existence than previously assumed.
Reptile Classification
Reptile classification refers to understanding how various reptiles are categorized based on shared characteristics. Traditional classifications have positioned dinosaurs within the broader category of reptiles due to shared features like scaly skin and certain bone structures.

However, the new fossil evidence challenges this traditional view by presenting traits commonly found in warm-blooded animals. This requires scientists to reconsider how they classify dinosaurs, as they share a number of physiological traits with birds and mammals.
  • Characteristics: Cold-blooded, scaly skin, and primarily lay eggs.
  • Modern examples include lizards, snakes, crocodiles, and turtles.
This classification debate highlights the fluid nature of scientific understanding and the importance of continuously revising our theories in light of new evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which one of the following situations most closely parallels that of the Oneida delegates in refusing to accept a lump-sum payment of $60,000 ? (A) A university offers a student a four-year scholarship with the stipulation that the student not accept any outside employment; the student refuses the offer and attends a different school because the amount of the scholarship would not have covered living expenses. (B) A company seeking to reduce its payroll obligations offers an employee a large bonus if he will accept early retirement; the employee refuses because he does not want to compromise an outstanding worker's compensation suit. (C) Parents of a teenager offer to pay her at the end of the month for performing weekly chores rather than paying her on a weekly basis; the teenager refuses because she has a number of financial obligations that she must meet early in the month. (D) A car dealer offers a customer a $500 cash payment for buying a new car; the customer refuses because she does not want to pay taxes on the amount, and requests instead that her monthly payments be reduced by a proportionate amount. (E) A landlord offers a tenant several months rent-free in exchange for the tenant's agreeing not to demand that her apartment be painted every two years, as is required by the lease; the tenant refuses because she would have to spend her own time painting the apartment.

The incidence in Japan of most types of cancer is remarkably low compared to that in North America, especially considering that Japan has a modern life- style, industrial pollution included. The cancer rates, however, for Japanese people who immigrate to North America and adopt the diet of North Americans approximate the higher cancer rates prevalent in North America. If the statements above are true, they provide the most support for which one of the following? (A) The greater the level of industrial pollution in a country, the higher that country's cancer rate will tend to be. (B) The stress of life in North America is greater than that of life in Japan and predisposes to cancer. (C) The staple foods of the Japanese diet contain elements that cure cancer. (D) The relatively low rate of cancer among people in Japan does not result from a high frequency of a protective genetic trait among Japanese people. (E) The higher cancer rates of Japanese immigrants to North America are caused by fats in the North American diet.

Only if the electorate is moral and intelligent will a democracy function well. Which one of the following can be logically inferred from the claim above? (A) If the electorate is moral and intelligent, then a democracy will function well. (B) Either a democracy does not function well or else the electorate is not moral or not intelligent. (C) If the electorate is not moral or not intelligent, then a democracy will not function well. (D) If a democracy does not function well, then the electorate is not moral or not intelligent. (E) It cannot, at the same time, be true that the electorate is moral and intelligent and that a democracy will not function well.

It might seem that an airline could increase profits by reducing airfares on all its flights in order to encourage discretionary travel and thus fill planes. Offers of across-the-board discount fares have, indeed, resulted in the sale of large numbers of reduced-price tickets. Nevertheless such offers have, in the past, actually cut the airline's profits. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above? (A) Fewer than 10 percent of all air travelers make no attempt to seek out discount fares. (B) Fares for trips between a large city and a small city are higher than those for trips between two large cities even when the distances involved are the same. (C) Across-the-board discounts in fares tend to decrease revenues on flights that are normally filled, but they fail to attract passengers to unpopular flights. (D) Only a small number of people who have never before traveled by air are persuaded to do so on the basis of across-the-board discount fares. (E) It is difficult to devise an advertising campaign that makes the public aware of across-the-board discount fares while fully explaining the restrictions applied to those discount fares.

English and the Austronesian language Mbarbaram both use the word "dog" for canines. These two languages are unrelated, and since speakers of the two languages only came in contact with one another long after the word "dog" was first used in this way in either language, neither language could have borrowed the word from the other. Thus this case shows that sometimes when languages share words that are similar in sound and meaning the similarity is due neither to language relatedness nor to borrowing. The argument requires that which one of the following be assumed? (A) English and Mbarbaram share no words other than "dog." (B) Several languages besides English and Mbarbaram use "dog" as the word for canines. (C) Usually when two languages share a word, those languages are related to each other. (D) There is no third language from which both English and Mbarbaram borrowed the word "dog." (E) If two unrelated languages share a word, speakers of those two languages must have come in contact with one another at some time.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free