Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Crimes in which handguns are used are more likely than other crimes to result in fatalities. However, the majority of crimes in which handguns are used do not result in fatalities. Therefore, there is no need to enact laws that address crimes involving handguns as distinct from other crimes. The pattern of flawed reasoning displayed in the argument above most closely resembles that in which one of the following? (A) Overweight people are at higher risk of developing heart disease than other people. However, more than half of all overweight people never develop heart disease. Hence it is unnecessary for physicians to be more careful to emphasize the danger of heart disease to their overweight patients than to their other patients. (B) Many people swim daily in order to stay physically fit. Yet people who swim daily increase their risk of developing ear infections. Hence people who want to remain in good health are better off not following fitness programs that include swimming daily. (C) Most physicians recommend a balanced diet for those who want to remain in good health. Yet many people find that nontraditional dietary regimens such as extended fasting do their health no serious harm. Therefore, there is no need for everyone to avoid nontraditional dietary regimens. (D) Foods rich in cholesterol and fat pose a serious health threat to most people. However, many people are reluctant to give up eating foods that they greatly enjoy. Therefore, people who refuse to give up rich foods need to spend more time exercising than do other people. (E) Many serious health problems are the result of dietary disorders. Yet these disorders are often brought about by psychological factors. Hence people suffering from serious health problems should undergo psychological evaluation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option A mirrors the flawed reasoning of the original argument.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Argument

The argument states that crimes involving handguns are more fatal compared to other crimes. However, since most handgun crimes do not result in fatalities, the argument concludes there's no need for specific laws addressing these crimes.
02

Identifying the Flaw

The flaw in reasoning here is that the conclusion dismisses the need for specific laws based on the fact that the majority of such crimes do not result in fatalities, ignoring the heightened risk of fatality in handgun crimes.
03

Analyzing Each Option

We need to identify which option uses similar flawed reasoning. We will compare the reasoning in each option to the original argument pattern.
04

Comparing Option A

In option A, overweight people are more at risk of heart disease, but since most do not develop it, the conclusion is that physicians need not emphasize the risk more with overweight patients. This mirrors the original argument's structure by using the absence of outcomes in the majority to argue against specific actions for high-risk groups.
05

Comparing Other Options

The other options (B, C, D, E) do not follow the flawed reasoning pattern. They either focus on different types of conclusions that don't mirror the structure of using a minority risk to guide broad actions or don't follow a similar structure of argumentation as found in option A.
06

Identifying the Closest Match

Option A uses the same reasoning flaw: it acknowledges a higher risk in one group but dismisses the need for specific cautionary measures due to the majority not experiencing the outcome, aligning with the flawed reasoning of the original argument.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the process of actively analyzing, interpreting, and evaluating information or arguments. It involves using logic and reasoning to understand complex situations and make informed decisions.
In the exercise provided, critical thinking requires us to discern the main argument and identify any flaws in reasoning that might not be immediately obvious. This means looking beyond the surface facts that "most handgun crimes do not result in fatalities" and questioning whether this justifies ignoring the elevated risk of those that do.
  • Critical thinking requires questioning assumptions.
  • It demands examining evidence and potential outcomes.
  • It involves considering alternative perspectives and contradictions.
By engaging in critical thinking, we can challenge statements that may seem reasonable at first glance but are ultimately misleading or incomplete.
Argument Evaluation
Argument evaluation is assessing the strength and validity of an argument. In simpler terms, it's about finding out if the reasons given truly support the conclusion.
When we evaluate an argument, like the one in the exercise, we focus on analyzing if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. The given argument suggests that because most handgun crimes don't end fatally, laws to address these crimes specifically are not required.
However, through argument evaluation, we realize that:
  • The presence of a less frequent outcome (fatalities) doesn't diminish its importance.
  • The elevated risk associated with handgun crimes still justifies a different legal approach.
  • A reliable evaluation notes that just because something isn't common, doesn't mean it's insignificant.
Through careful evaluation, we learn to identify whether or not the reasons truly back up the conclusions drawn.
Reasoning Flaws
Reasoning flaws are errors in logic that weaken an argument. Understanding these flaws helps us identify when an argument lacks sound reasoning.

In the original exercise, the flawed reasoning comes from suggesting that because something happens less frequently (like fatalities from handgun crimes), it doesn't warrant special attention. This is a classic example of misunderstanding statistics or probabilities.
  • Reasoning flaws often arise from misleading conclusions.
  • They can include circular reasoning, hasty generalizations, or ignoring relevant evidence.
  • Recognizing these flaws involves looking closely at the way arguments are constructed.
In our example, the flaw lies in assuming that the lower frequency of an outcome reduces its need for address, thus failing to consider the potential severity of the outcomes.
Analytical Skills
Developing analytical skills involves the ability to break down complex concepts and solve problems more effectively. These skills are critical when dissecting arguments, as seen in our exercise.
Analytical skills allow us to:
  • Identify key components of an argument.
  • Understand relationships between different ideas or events.
  • Draw well-founded conclusions by connecting all the dots.

In the given argument about handgun crime laws, using analytical skills enables us to systematically evaluate each part of the argument. We can understand why the argument is flawed by linking its assumptions to the final conclusion and identifying areas where the reasoning doesn't hold up. With these skills, we process information logically, ensuring better judgment and decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

English and the Austronesian language Mbarbaram both use the word "dog" for canines. These two languages are unrelated, and since speakers of the two languages only came in contact with one another long after the word "dog" was first used in this way in either language, neither language could have borrowed the word from the other. Thus this case shows that sometimes when languages share words that are similar in sound and meaning the similarity is due neither to language relatedness nor to borrowing. The argument requires that which one of the following be assumed? (A) English and Mbarbaram share no words other than "dog." (B) Several languages besides English and Mbarbaram use "dog" as the word for canines. (C) Usually when two languages share a word, those languages are related to each other. (D) There is no third language from which both English and Mbarbaram borrowed the word "dog." (E) If two unrelated languages share a word, speakers of those two languages must have come in contact with one another at some time.

Only if the electorate is moral and intelligent will a democracy function well. Which one of the following can be logically inferred from the claim above? (A) If the electorate is moral and intelligent, then a democracy will function well. (B) Either a democracy does not function well or else the electorate is not moral or not intelligent. (C) If the electorate is not moral or not intelligent, then a democracy will not function well. (D) If a democracy does not function well, then the electorate is not moral or not intelligent. (E) It cannot, at the same time, be true that the electorate is moral and intelligent and that a democracy will not function well.

In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents - rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide. Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll's prediction was inaccurate? (A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents. (B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population. (C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today. (D) No effort was made to determine the respondents' political affiliations. (E) Because the poll asked only for respondents' candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.

Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal in landfills and incineration plants, report that disposable plastics make up an ever- increasing percentage of the waste they handle. It is clear that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away in the garbage are failing. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Because plastics create harmful pollutants when burned, an increasing percentage of the plastics handled by waste management companies are being disposed of in landfills. (B) Although many plastics are recyclable, most of the plastics disposed of by waste management companies are not. (C) People are more likely to save and reuse plastic containers than containers made of heavier materials like glass or metal. (D) An increasing proportion of the paper, glass, and metal cans that waste management companies used to handle is now being recycled. (E) While the percentage of products using plastic packaging is increasing, the total amount of plastic being manufactured has remained unchanged.

When a study of aspirin's ability to prevent heart attacks in humans yielded positive results, researchers immediately submitted those results to a medical journal, which published them six weeks later. Had the results been published sooner, many of the heart attacks that occurred during the delay could have been prevented. The conclusion drawn above would be most undermined if it were true that (A) the medical journal's staff worked overtime in order to publish the study's results as soon as possible (B) studies of aspirin's usefulness in reducing heart attacks in laboratory animals remain inconclusive (C) people who take aspirin regularly suffer a higher-than-average incidence of stomach ulcers (D) the medical journal's official policy is to publish articles only after an extensive review process (E) a person's risk of suffering a heart attack drops only after that person has taken aspirin regularly for two years

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free