Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

It can safely be concluded that there are at least as many trees in Seclee as there are in Martown. From which one of the following does the conclusion logically follow? (A) More trees were planted in Seclee in the past two years than in Martown. (B) Seclee is the region within which Martown is located. (C) Martown is suffering from an epidemic of tree-virus infection. (D) The average annual rainfall for Seclee is greater than the average annual rainfall for Martown. (E) The average number of trees cut down annually in Martown is higher than in Seclee.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The conclusion follows from option (B).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Conclusion

The conclusion states that there are at least as many trees in Seclee as there are in Martown. This suggests a comparison between the number of trees in two different areas.
02

Analyzing Logical Implications

For the conclusion to be logically valid, the statement must ensure that Seclee has a number of trees that is at least equal to or more than Martown, either through inclusion or impact factors like planting, geography, or deforestation.
03

Evaluating Each Option

Let's analyze: (A) More planting only implies recent trends, not overall count, so this doesn't assure current numbers. (B) If Seclee encompasses Martown, every tree in Martown is also in Seclee, directly supporting the conclusion. (C) An epidemic in Martown does not guarantee fewer trees than Seclee. (D) Rainfall might influence trees but doesn't give a precise count or assurance. (E) More cutting in Martown does imply more reduction, but it doesn't guarantee that Seclee now has equal or more trees.
04

Identifying the Correct Option

Option (B) logically assures that all trees in Martown are included in the count of Seclee trees, meeting the conclusion that Seclee has at least as many trees as Martown.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

LSAT Preparation
Preparing for the LSAT involves understanding logical reasoning principles, as many questions test your ability to identify valid arguments and conclusions. The logical reasoning section often includes questions like the one discussed here, requiring test-takers to deduce relationships between statements.
To excel, it's crucial to
  • break down each question to its basic components,
  • identify premises and conclusions,
  • evaluate whether the premises logically support the conclusion.
Effective preparation involves practicing with real LSAT questions to familiarize yourself with typical logical constructs. This will improve your speed and accuracy on test day, as understanding the patterns in logical reasoning questions can significantly boost LSAT scores.
Analytical Skills
Analytical skills are essential when evaluating logical reasoning questions, as they allow you to dissect arguments methodically. In this context, the problem presented evaluates your ability to analyze varied statements about tree populations in different areas. To enhance your analytical skills:
  • Practice identifying key points in arguments.
  • Understand different types of reasoning errors.
  • Develop a structured approach to analyzing options.
By improving these skills, you can accurately determine which statements directly support a given conclusion. Recognizing relationships and implications is key to developing strong analytical abilities, which are not only crucial for the LSAT but also valuable in many professional fields.
Reasoning Evaluation
Reasoning evaluation involves assessing whether a given argument is valid or fallacious. In the presented exercise, the objective is to determine which statement implies a correct conclusion. This skill necessitates practice in:
  • Finding logical consistency in premises and conclusions.
  • Identifying assumptions or hidden premises that might impact conclusions.
  • Distinguishing between relevant and irrelevant information.
Evaluating arguments critically means being able to spot a statement that logically leads to a conclusion, as demonstrated by identifying option (B) as the correct answer. This option reassures that Seclee encompasses Martown, making the conclusion about the tree count logically sound.
Logical Implications
Logical implications refer to the relationship between statements and their conclusions in logical reasoning. Understanding these implications helps in forming valid, well-supported arguments. In the context of the exercise, the concept involves recognizing how certain statements naturally lead to specific conclusions.
  • Identifying direct implications is about finding clear cause-and-effect relationships.
  • Recognizing implicit implications requires understanding nuanced or indirect connections.
  • Ensuring assumptions align with conclusions is crucial.
The statement that Martown is located within Seclee implies all trees in Martown are part of Seclee’s tree count, exemplifying a logical implication. These skills are instrumental in developing solid reasoning abilities useful in both academic and professional settings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers have a lower conviction rate than those who rely on court-appointed public defenders. This explains why criminals who commit lucrative crimes like embezzlement or insider trading are more successful at avoiding conviction than are street criminals. The explanation offered above would be more persuasive if which one of the following were true? (A) Many street crimes, such as drug dealing, are extremely lucrative and those committing them can afford expensive private lawyers. (B) Most prosecutors are not competent to handle cases involving highly technical financial evidence and have more success in prosecuting cases of robbery or simple assault. (C) The number of criminals convicted of street crimes is far greater than the number of criminals convicted of embezzlement or insider trading. (D) The percentage of defendants who actually committed the crimes of which they are accused is no greater for publicly defended than for privately defended defendants. (E) Juries, out of sympathy for the victims of crimes, are much more likely to convict defendants accused of violent crimes than they are to convict defendants accused of "victimless" crimes or crimes against property.

In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to \(10 \mathrm{mil}-\) ligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe. The biologist's response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions? (A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone. (B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives. (C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season. (D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected. (E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.

Elena: While I was at the dog show, every dog that growled at me was a white poodle, and every white poodle I saw growled at me. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Elena's statement? (A) The only white dogs that Elena saw at the dog show were poodles. (B) There were no gray poodles at the dog show. (C) At the dog show, no gray dogs growled at Elena. (D) All the white dogs that Elena saw growled at her. (E) Elena did not see any gray poodles at the dog show.

Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and the lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain. The advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies? (A) It cites experimental evidence that subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences. (B) It ridicules people who do not subscribe to Stimulus by suggesting that they do not believe that exercise will improve brain capacity. (C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use. (D) It supports its recommendation by a careful analysis of the concept of exercise. (E) It implies that brains and muscle are similar in one respect because they are similar in another respect.

When old-growth forests are cleared of tall trees, more sunlight reaches the forest floor. This results in a sharp increase in the population of leafy shrubs on which the mule deer depend for food. Yet mule deer herds that inhabit cleared forests are less well-nourished than are herds living in old- growth forests. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox? (A) Mule deer have enzyme-rich saliva and specialized digestive organs that enable the deer to digest tough plants inedible to other deer species. (B) Mule deer herds that inhabit cleared forests tend to have more females with young offspring and fewer adult males than do other mule deer populations. (C) Mule deer populations are spread throughout western North America and inhabit hot, sunny climates as well as cool, wet climates. (D) As plants receive more sunlight, they produce higher amounts of tannins, compounds that inhibit digestion of the plants' proteins. (E) Insect parasites, such as certain species of ticks, that feed primarily on mule deer often dwell in trees, from which they drop onto passing deer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free