Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the passage? (A) Gray marketing is unfair to trademark owners and should be legally controlled. (B) Gray marketing is practiced in many different forms and places, and legislators should recognize the futility of trying to regulate it. (C) The mechanisms used to control gray marketing across markets are different from those most effective in controlling gray marketing within markets. (D) The three trademark law theories that have been applied in gray marketing cases lead to different case outcomes. (E) Current theories used to interpret trademark laws have resulted in increased gray marketing activity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D best expresses the main point.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying Key Concepts

First, let's identify the key concepts in the passage. Look for repeated ideas or terms and note the main focus. Understand what 'gray marketing' means and how it relates to trademark laws.
02

Analyze Each Option

Examine each of the answer choices one by one. Consider what the option suggests and how closely it relates to the main focus of the passage. Eliminate options that don't directly relate to the overall theme or main argument.
03

Narrow Down Choices

Through careful elimination, decide which answers are less relevant based on the passage content. For example, if options focus on futility (option B) or mechanisms (option C), check if those were discussed in depth.
04

Choose the Best Expression

Select the option that most accurately sums up the primary argument of the passage. Since the outcome of trademark law theories and their effect on gray marketing is highlighted, discern the depth of analysis provided in option D.
05

Confirm Selection

Verify that the chosen option is supported by details within the passage. If option D, focusing on how the different theories lead to varied legal outcomes, was discussed prominently, it is likely the main point.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gray Marketing
Gray marketing refers to the practice of selling genuine products through unauthorized channels that are not intended by the original manufacturer. This often happens across different geographical regions where the price of goods can vary significantly. For instance, products bought legally in one country may be resold in another at a lower cost because of currency fluctuations, taxes, or different pricing strategies.
While gray marketing is legal, it is contentious because it bypasses the traditional distribution channels and can affect the profits of authorized retailers. It often deals with genuine products, unlike counterfeit goods, and utilizes the disparities in global pricing.
  • This practice can undermine the pricing strategy of a brand.
  • It can also hurt the brand's relationship with retailers.
  • Customers might face issues with warranties or servicing.
Understanding gray marketing's impact on trademark laws and legal outcomes is crucial to grasp the full complexity of this practice.
Trademark Laws
Trademark laws are designed to protect brands by ensuring that products and services can be easily distinguished from one another. They safeguard the identity of a brand, preventing unauthorized use that may cause confusion among consumers. When it comes to gray marketing, trademark laws play a pivotal role. Companies often seek to impose legal restrictions on gray marketers to control unauthorized product distribution.
However, applying these laws in gray marketing cases can be challenging. Since the products are genuine, albeit sold through unapproved channels, enforcing traditional trademark laws becomes complicated. Manufacturers might try to use trademark infringement claims to limit gray marketing, arguing that it could mislead consumers about the origins or warranties of a product.
In gray marketing contexts, trademark laws aim to:
  • Protect the brand’s reputation.
  • Maintain control over the commercial perception of a product.
  • Ensure consumers receive products through authorized channels.
The nuances of how trademark laws apply to gray marketing can influence the efficacy of legal actions against unauthorized sales.
Legal Theories
Legal theories guide the interpretation and application of laws in resolving disputes, including those involving gray marketing. In the context of gray marketing, various legal theories have been employed to address the issues arising from unauthorized distribution. Some of the prominent theories used are:
  • **Trademark Infringement Theory**: Focuses on whether the unauthorized channel causes consumer confusion about the manufacturer or warranty.
  • **Contract Law Theory**: Deals with the agreements between manufacturers and authorized sellers and if gray marketers violate these terms.
  • **Antitrust Theory**: Examines whether efforts to stop gray marketing restrict competition unfairly.
Each legal theory offers a different angle on gray marketing. The outcome of a case may heavily depend on which theory is dominant in court proceedings. Different jurisdictions might favor different theories based on precedent, economic policies, or market conditions. Understanding these theories helps inform about why gray marketing is such a complex legal matter.
Market Regulation
Market regulation involves the rules and policies set by authorities to control how markets function and how products are distributed and sold. In the discussion of gray marketing, market regulation becomes complex since it deals with balancing consumer interests, trade norms, and brand protection. Governments may impose restrictions on flow of products between countries to protect local businesses.
Regulating gray marketing is challenging because:
  • The practice is not exactly illegal.
  • It involves genuine products, legally purchased, though resold through unauthorized channels.
  • It can expose regulatory inconsistencies between different countries.
Effective market regulation seeks to ensure fair competition, protect consumer interests, and prevent the undermining of a brand's market strategies. While regulatory bodies may attempt to limit gray marketing, finding a balance between regulation and the free market is an ongoing challenge. As markets become more globalized, the role of regulation in gray marketing will continue to evolve.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Harry: Airlines have made it possible for anyone to travel around the world in much less time than was formerly possible. Judith: That is not true. Many flights are too expensive for all but the rich. Judith's response shows that she interprets Harry's statement to imply that (A) the majority of people are rich (B) everyone has an equal right to experience world travel (C) world travel is only possible via routes serviced by airlines (D) most forms of world travel are not affordable for most people (E) anyone can afford to travel long distances by air

The author mentions that goodwill was probably excluded from the probate valuation of a business in nineteenth-century Britain most likely in order to (A) give an example of a business asset about which little was known in the nineteenth century (B) suggest that the probate valuations of certain businesses may have been significant underestimations of their true market value (C) make the point that this exclusion probably had an equal impact on the probate valuations of all nineteenth-century British businesses (D) indicate that expectations about future profit-making is the single most important factor in determining the market value of certain businesses (E) argue that the twentieth-century method of determining probate valuations of a business may be consistently superior to the nineteenth-century method

Sabina: The words used in expressing facts affect neither the facts nor the conclusions those facts will support. Moreover, if the words are clearly defined and consistently used, the actual words chosen make no difference to an argument's soundness. Thus, how an argument is expressed can have no bearing on whether it is a good argument. Emile: Badly chosen words can make even the soundest argument a poor one. After all, many words have social and political connotations that influence people's response to claims expressed in those words, regardless of how carefully and explicitly those words are defined. Since whether people will acknowledge a fact is affected by how the fact is expressed, the conclusions they actually draw are also affected. The point at issue between Emile and Sabina is whether (A) defining words in one way rather than another can alter either the facts or the conclusions the facts will justify (B) a word can be defined without taking into account its social and political connotations (C) a sound argument in support of a given conclusion is a better argument than any unsound argument for that same conclusion (D) it would be a good policy to avoid using words that are likely to lead people either to misunderstand the claims being made or to reason badly about those claims (E) a factor that affects neither the truth of an argument's premises nor the logical relation between its premises and its conclusion can cause an argument to be a bad one

Genevieve: Increasing costs have led commercial airlines to cut back on airplane maintenance. Also, reductions in public spending have led to air traffic control centers being underfunded and understaffed. For these and other reasons it is becoming quite unsafe to fly, and so one should avoid doing it. Harold: Your reasoning may be sound, but I can hardly accept your conclusion when you yourself have recently been flying on commercial airlines even more than before. Which one of the following relies on a questionable technique most similar to that used in Harold's reply to Genevieve? (A) David says that the new film is not very good, but he has not seen it himself, so I don't accept his opinion. (B) A long time ago Maria showed me a great way to cook lamb, but for medical reasons she no longer eats red meat, so I'll cook something else for dinner tonight. (C) Susan has been trying to persuade me to go rock climbing with her, claiming that it's quite safe, but last week she fell and broke her collarbone, so I don't believe her. (D) Pat has shown me research that proves that eating raw green vegetables is very beneficial and that one should eat them daily, but I don't believe it, since she hardly ever eats raw green vegetables. (E) Gabriel has all the qualifications we have specified for the job and has much relevant work experience, but I don't believe we should hire him, because when he worked in a similar position before his performance was mediocre.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would contribute most to a defense of the manufacturer's position against that of the consumer advocate? (A) In the absence of government definitions for terms used in product labeling, common standards of understanding alone should apply. (B) Government standards for truthful labeling should always be designed to reflect common standards of understanding. (C) People should be free, to the extent that it is legal to do so, to exploit to their advantages the inherent ambiguity and vagueness in language. (D) When government standards and common standards for truthful labeling are incompatible with each other, the government standards should always take precedence. (E) In their interpretation of language, consumers should never presume that vagueness indicates an attempt to deceive on the part of manufacturers unless those manufacturers would reap large benefits from successful deception.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free