Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen an argument of the opponents of rDNA technology? (A) Agricultural products developed through rDNA technology are no more attractive to consumers than are traditional crops. (B) Genetically altered microorganisms have no natural predators but can prey on a wide variety of other microorganisms. (C) Drugs produced using rDNA technology cost more to manufacture than drugs produced with traditional technologies. (D) Ecosystems are impermanent systems that are often liable to collapse, and occasionally do so. (E) Genetically altered microorganisms generally cannot survive for more than a few hours in the natural environment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(B) strengthens the argument by highlighting environmental risks.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Opponents' Argument

Opponents of rDNA technology are generally concerned about the potential risks and unforeseen consequences this technology might have on the environment, agriculture, and public health. Therefore, the strengthening statement must highlight a significant risk or drawback related to these areas.
02

Evaluate Each Option

Go through each option to determine its impact on the strength of the opponents' argument: - (A) suggests no consumer preference, which doesn't directly strengthen concerns about risk or danger. - (B) implies that genetically altered microorganisms could disrupt natural ecosystems due to lack of predators, supporting potential environmental harm. - (C) focuses on cost, which does not address concerns related to risks or dangers. - (D) discusses general ecosystem instability, which is unrelated to the specific effects of rDNA technology. - (E) indicates genetically altered microorganisms die quickly in nature, potentially diminishing environmental risk concerns.
03

Select the Most Impactful Option

Based on the analysis, option (B) is the most impactful because it directly addresses possible risks associated with rDNA technology by suggesting that altered microorganisms could lead to environmental harm due to their ability to prey broadly without being preyed upon.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

rDNA Technology
Recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology is a fascinating field that involves the manipulation of genetic material. It allows scientists to create new combinations of DNA sequences that do not occur naturally. These sequences can be inserted into organisms to give them new traits or capabilities. This technology has been instrumental in advancing medicine, agriculture, and industrial applications. However, despite its benefits, it comes with certain concerns regarding its impact on the environment and public health.

This process starts with identifying a useful gene, isolating it, and integrating it into the host organism's DNA. By doing this, scientists can make plants resistant to pests, produce insulin in bacteria, or create new vaccines. The great potential of rDNA technology lies in its ability to solve many global challenges. Yet, it's crucial to consider ethical and safety issues to ensure its responsible use.
Environmental Impact
The introduction of organisms with genetically modified DNA into the environment has sparked significant debate about potential impacts. One concern is the unpredictability of these organisms in natural ecosystems. They may disrupt existing balances by outcompeting native species or introducing novel diseases. In particular, these concerns are heightened when genetically altered microorganisms are involved.

These organisms might have unintended interactions with other living organisms, potentially leading to ecological imbalances. For instance, if they lack natural predators, as suggested in option (B) of the original exercise, they might proliferate uncontrollably. Such scenarios could lead to adversities for natural habitats and biodiversity. Efforts need to be placed on thoroughly assessing these risks before releasing modified organisms into the wild.
Genetically Altered Microorganisms
Genetically altered microorganisms (GAMs) are microorganisms that have been modified using rDNA technology to express desired traits. These traits may range from enhanced production of substances like insulin or enzymes to improved resilience against environmental stressors. Despite their potential advantages, GAMs pose unique challenges and threats, particularly when they escape into the natural environment.

The primary concern is their adaptability and capacity for growth without natural constraints. This lack of predators or competition, addressed in the original exercise, could lead to their success over native microorganisms, which might result in unforeseen ecological disruptions. Thus, understanding and managing the consequences of introducing these microorganisms into the environment are critical to minimize negative impacts.
Public Health Concerns
Public health concerns surrounding rDNA technology mainly focus on safety and the possible long-term consequences of its applications. While this technology holds promise for advancing healthcare, such as developing more effective drugs and vaccines, it also raises questions about the potential adverse effects.

One worry is that genetically altered organisms used in consumer products or food could cause allergic reactions or other health problems. Additionally, there are fears about the development of antibiotic resistance if these organisms were to exchange genes with pathogenic bacteria. For these reasons, rigorous testing and regulatory measures are essential to ensure that rDNA technology advances public health without compromising safety.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The author suggests that the total probate valuations of the personal property of individuals holding goods for sale in nineteenth-century Britain may have been (A) affected by the valuation conventions for such goods (B) less accurate than the valuations for such goods provided by income tax returns (C) less, on average, if such goods were tobacco-related than if they were alcohol-related (D) greater, on average, than the total probate valuations of those individuals who held bank balances (E) dependent on whether such goods were held by industrialists or by merchants or bankers

In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to \(10 \mathrm{mil}-\) ligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe. The biologist's response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions? (A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone. (B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives. (C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season. (D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected. (E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would contribute most to a defense of the manufacturer's position against that of the consumer advocate? (A) In the absence of government definitions for terms used in product labeling, common standards of understanding alone should apply. (B) Government standards for truthful labeling should always be designed to reflect common standards of understanding. (C) People should be free, to the extent that it is legal to do so, to exploit to their advantages the inherent ambiguity and vagueness in language. (D) When government standards and common standards for truthful labeling are incompatible with each other, the government standards should always take precedence. (E) In their interpretation of language, consumers should never presume that vagueness indicates an attempt to deceive on the part of manufacturers unless those manufacturers would reap large benefits from successful deception.

Nutritionists have recommended that people eat more fiber. Advertisements for a new fiber-supplement pill state only that it contains "44 percent fiber." The advertising claim is misleading in its selection of information on which to focus if which one of the following is true? (A) There are other products on the market that are advertised as providing fiber as a dietary supplement. (B) Nutritionists base their recommendation on medical findings that dietary fiber protects against some kinds of cancer. (C) It is possible to become addicted to some kinds of advertised pills, such as sleeping pills and painkillers. (D) The label of the advertised product recommends taking 3 pills every day. (E) The recommended daily intake of fiber is 20 to 30 grams, and the pill contains one-third gram.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Academics respect only people who hold doctoral degrees. (B) All of this university's professors have obtained doctoral degrees. (C) At this university, every professor who holds a doctoral degree in computer science really knows about computers. (D) All academics who hold doctoral degrees are respected by their academic colleagues. (E) Among this university's staff members with doctoral degrees, only those in the computer science department really know about computers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free