Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and the lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain. The advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies? (A) It cites experimental evidence that subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences. (B) It ridicules people who do not subscribe to Stimulus by suggesting that they do not believe that exercise will improve brain capacity. (C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use. (D) It supports its recommendation by a careful analysis of the concept of exercise. (E) It implies that brains and muscle are similar in one respect because they are similar in another respect.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The advertisement uses analogy: Option (E).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument claims that exercise improves the performance of physical organs like the heart and lungs, and similarly implies that since the brain is also a physical organ, exercising it would improve its performance too.
02

Identify the Strategy

Examine the advertisement for any comparisons or analogies used. It draws a parallel between the improvement of physical organs through exercise and the brain, suggesting that it too can be improved by 'exercising' it through reading the magazine.
03

Analyze Each Option

Review each multiple-choice option to determine which best represents how the argument is structured. - (A) mentions experimental evidence, which is not present in the advertisement. - (B) talks about ridiculing non-subscribers, which the ad doesn't do. - (C) suggests a process description, but no detailed process is explained. - (D) implies a detailed concept analysis, which is not provided. - (E) suggests an analogy between brain and muscle improvement, fitting the strategy used.
04

Select the Best Option

Based on the analysis, option (E) fits best as it highlights the analogy strategy by comparing the brain to muscles, claiming similarity due to both being physical organs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Analysis
In the world of logic and reasoning, analyzing an argument is crucial to understanding its structure and validity. The exercise presented an advertisement claiming that exercising the brain through reading a magazine improves its performance, similar to physical exercise improving other organs. To analyze this argument, we start by identifying its components: the premise and the conclusion.
The premise is that exercise enhances physical organs like the heart and lungs. The conclusion is that because the brain is a physical organ, it too will benefit from exercise, specifically through reading. This argument uses a method of reasoning that draws a conclusion based on the analogy between bodily organs and the brain.
  • Look for keywords that signal an inference, like "since" or "because".
  • Identify the supporting evidence for the conclusion.
  • Distinguish between stated and implied reasoning.
By engaging in argument analysis, we can better understand if the reasoning presented in the advertisement is logically sound or if it leaves room for questioning its conclusion.
Analogical Reasoning
Analogical reasoning is a type of thinking where one infers that if two or more things agree with one another in some respects, they will probably agree in others. In our advertisement example, the brain is being compared to physical muscles. The analogy suggests that because both the brain and muscles are physical organs, they improve through a similar type of stimulation or exercise.
To evaluate analogical reasoning, here's what you need to consider:
  • Similarity: Ensure that the items being compared share significant characteristics.
  • Relevance: Check if the similarities directly relate to the conclusion drawn.
  • Differences: Consider notable differences that might affect the conclusion.
The strength of analogical reasoning relies heavily on the relevance and extent of similarities. In the case of our advertisement, the argument depends on the analogy that exercising leads to performance improvement in physical organs, including the brain.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the disciplined process of actively and skillfully analyzing, assessing, and reconstructing arguments or statements that you encounter. It involves being open-minded and skeptical, questioning the validity of assertions made, especially as seen in persuasive advertisements.
Using critical thinking with the given exercise, one would ask:
  • Is there scientific evidence supporting the claim that mental exercise is analogous to physical exercise?
  • Are there alternative explanations for the claimed improvement in brain function?
  • What assumptions are being made about the nature of exercise and its effects on different organs?
Critical thinking helps peel back the layers of persuasion to evaluate whether the advertisement's claim stands up to scrutiny, encouraging skepticism and inquiry rather than blind acceptance.
Advertisement Strategies
In the competitive realm of advertisements, crafting persuasive messages is key. The exercise uses several strategic approaches to influence potential customers. One such strategy is analogical reasoning, as discussed earlier, to draw a connection between physical exercise and reading to improve the brain's function. This comparison is compelling because it taps into familiar experiences and perceived truths.
Effective advertisement strategies also include:
  • Emotional Appeal: Engaging the audience's feelings, like fear of missing out or desire for self-improvement.
  • Testimonial Use: Presenting customer reviews or endorsements to build credibility.
  • Urgency Creation: Promoting immediate action with call-to-action phrases like "Act now."
By employing these strategies, the advertisement aims to persuade the audience efficiently and effectively, leveraging logic, emotion, and urgency to drive action.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Certain items-those with that hard-to-define quality called exclusivity-have the odd property, when they become available for sale, of selling rapidly even though they are extremely expensive. In fact, trying to sell such an item fast by asking too low a price is a serious error, since it calls into question the very thing-exclusivity - that is supposed to be the item's chief appeal. Therefore, given that a price that will prove to be right is virtually impossible for the seller to gauge in advance, the seller should make sure that any error in the initial asking price is in the direction of setting the price too high. The argument recommends a certain pricing strategy on the grounds that (A) this strategy lacks a counterproductive feature of the rejected alternative (B) this strategy has all of the advantages of the rejected alternative, but fewer of its disadvantages (C) experience has proven this strategy to be superior, even though the reasons for this superiority elude analysis (D) this strategy does not rely on prospective buyers \(^*\) estimates of value (E) the error associated with this strategy, unlike the error associated with the rejected alternative, is likely to go unnoticed

11\. Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the explanation given in the argument? (A) At various times during the last ten years, several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea have experienced unprecedentedly steep drops in population. (B) By reducing pollution at its source, Northern Europe and Scandinavia have been taking the lead in preventing pollution from reaching the waters of the North Sea. (C) For many years, fish for human consumption have been taken from the waters of the North Sea. (D) There are two species of seal found throughout the North Sea area, the common seal and the gray seal. (E) The distemper caused by the virus was a disease that was new to the population of North Sea seals in May 1988, and so the seals, immune systems were unprepared to counter it.

All people residing in the country of Gradara approve of legislation requiring that certain hazardous wastes be disposed of by being burned in modern high- temperature incinerators. However, waste disposal companies planning to build such incinerators encounter fierce resistance to their applications for building permits from the residents of every Gradaran community that those companies propose as an incinerator site. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the residents' simultaneously holding both of the positions ascribed to them? (A) High-temperature incineration minimizes the overall risk to the human population of the country from the wastes being disposed of, but it concentrates the remaining risk in a small number of incineration sites. (B) High-temperature incineration is more expensive than any of the available alternatives would be, and the higher costs would be recovered through higher product prices. (C) High-temperature incineration will be carried out by private companies rather than by a government agency so that the government will not be required to police itself. (D) The toxic fumes generated within a high-temperature incinerator can be further treated so that all toxic residues from a properly operating incinerator are solids. (E) The substantial cost of high-temperature incineration can be partially offset by revenue from sales of electric energy generated as a by-product of incineration.

A large group of hyperactive children whose regular diets included food containing large amounts of additives was observed by researchers trained to assess the presence or absence of behavior problems. The children were then placed on a low-additive diet for several weeks, after which they were observed again. Originally nearly 60 percent of the children exhibited behavior problems; after the change in diet, only 30 percent did so. On the basis of these data, it can be concluded that food additives can contribute to behavior problems in hyperactive children. The evidence cited fails to establish the conclusion because (A) there is no evidence that the reduction in behavior problems was proportionate to the reduction in food-additive intake (B) there is no way to know what changes would have occurred without the change of diet, since only children who changed to a low-additive diet were studied (C) exactly how many children exhibited behavior problems after the change in diet cannot be determined, since the size of the group studied is not precisely given (D) there is no evidence that the behavior of some of the children was unaffected by additives (E) the evidence is consistent with the claim that some children exhibit more frequent behavior problems after being on the low-additive diet than they had exhibited when first observed

Many environmentalists have urged environmental awareness on consumers, saying that if we accept moral responsibility for our effects on the environment, then products that directly or indirectly harm the environment ought to be avoided. Unfortunately it is usually impossible for consumers to assess the environmental impact of a product, and thus impossible for them to consciously restrict their purchases to environmentally benign products. Because of this impossibility there can be no moral duty to choose products in the way these environmentalists urge, since Which one of the following principles provides the most appropriate completion for the argument? (A) a moral duty to perform an action is never based solely on the effects the action will have on other people (B) a person cannot possibly have a moral duty to do what he or she is unable to do (C) moral considerations should not be the sole determinants of what products are made available to consumers (D) the morally right action is always the one whose effects produce the least total harm (E) where a moral duty exists, it supersedes any legal duty and any other kind of duty

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free