Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Many environmentalists have urged environmental awareness on consumers, saying that if we accept moral responsibility for our effects on the environment, then products that directly or indirectly harm the environment ought to be avoided. Unfortunately it is usually impossible for consumers to assess the environmental impact of a product, and thus impossible for them to consciously restrict their purchases to environmentally benign products. Because of this impossibility there can be no moral duty to choose products in the way these environmentalists urge, since Which one of the following principles provides the most appropriate completion for the argument? (A) a moral duty to perform an action is never based solely on the effects the action will have on other people (B) a person cannot possibly have a moral duty to do what he or she is unable to do (C) moral considerations should not be the sole determinants of what products are made available to consumers (D) the morally right action is always the one whose effects produce the least total harm (E) where a moral duty exists, it supersedes any legal duty and any other kind of duty

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option B: a person cannot have a moral duty to do what he or she is unable to do.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument states that environmentalists believe consumers have a moral responsibility to avoid products harming the environment. However, since assessing the environmental impact of products is typically impossible for consumers, the argument concludes that consumers cannot have a moral duty to choose environmentally friendly products.
02

Identify the Gap in Reasoning

The main gap in reasoning in the argument is the link between the impossibility of assessing environmental impacts and the claim that there is no moral duty to act on those assessments. This gap implies a principle about moral duties and the ability to act.
03

Match a Relevant Principle

We need a principle that bridges this gap by stating that a moral duty cannot exist if the required action is impossible. Option B states that a person cannot possibly have a moral duty to do what he or she is unable to do, precisely addressing this gap.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Moral Responsibility
Moral responsibility involves being accountable for the actions we take and the consequences they have on others, including the environment. It suggests we should aim to do what is right, based on the effects our actions might have. In the context of consumer behavior and environmental concerns, moral responsibility means being aware of how our purchases impact the world around us. However, as the argument suggests, if it's impossible to fully understand the environmental impact of our choices, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to uphold this kind of moral responsibility. This is because we cannot be held accountable for actions when we lack the necessary information to make informed decisions.
Therefore, while moral responsibility is crucial, it is also contingent upon our ability to understand and predict the outcomes of our choices. This connection between knowledge and ethical action highlights the complexity of applying moral responsibility in everyday consumer decisions.
Environmental Awareness
Environmental awareness involves understanding the environmental issues and impacts of our actions. It is about recognizing the role each individual and consumer plays in the larger ecosystem. By becoming environmentally aware, we acknowledge how products we use daily may contribute to issues like pollution or resource depletion.
When consumers are urged to choose products that are environmentally friendly, it aligns with this awareness. However, as noted in the exercise, without adequate information on the environmental impact of products, consumers may find it challenging to make informed decisions.
This lack of information highlights the need for better labeling and transparency from manufacturers to facilitate greater environmental awareness at the consumer level. Living in a world where such impacts can often be hidden or indirect, enhancing our awareness requires concerted efforts from both consumers and producers.
Consumer Decision Making
Consumer decision making refers to the process by which individuals choose what products or services to purchase. It involves weighing various factors, such as cost, quality, brand reputation, and ethical considerations. Ideally, consumers should also consider environmental impact when making choices.
However, as outlined in the original argument, making environmentally conscious decisions can be difficult if consumers lack access to comprehensive information about the products they're selecting from. This absence of information can impair decision-making abilities, leading to choices that might not align with consumers' moral standards.
To empower consumers, companies can play a crucial role by providing clear and reliable information about their products and their environmental effects. Additionally, fostering environmental education can improve consumer decision making by equipping individuals with the tools needed to critically analyze the information they receive.
Ethical Principles
Ethical principles provide a framework for determining right from wrong and guide our behaviors and decision-making processes. In relation to consumer choices, these principles can include fairness, justice, and harm reduction, among others. They urge us to consider the broader implications of our actions, including those that affect the environment.
The argument referenced earlier raises the question of whether consumers have a moral duty to choose products based on their environmental impact when that impact is difficult to ascertain. One of the principles at play suggests that moral duties rely on the ability to perform an action. If consumers cannot reasonably determine the environmental effects of their purchases, the ethical principle might argue they do not have a moral responsibility to make environmentally conscious choices.
Thus, ethical principles in consumer behavior are not just about rigid rules but also about the capacity and context in which decisions are made. This understanding can help consumers navigate the morally complex landscape of modern consumption.
Logical Reasoning Skills
Logical reasoning skills are essential for analyzing arguments, identifying gaps in reasoning, and making sound conclusions. In the original exercise, logic helps us understand why it might be problematic to impose a moral duty on consumers when they cannot reasonably perform the required action.
Developing logical reasoning skills allows individuals to critically assess claims and evidence, such as the calls for moral responsibility in environmental decisions. It involves evaluating the relationship between premises and conclusions—recognizing, for instance, that without the ability to assess environmental impacts, it may not be logical to claim a moral duty exists.
By sharpening these skills, individuals can make better-informed decisions and argument-based evaluations. This is crucial in everyday life but also in test scenarios like the LSAT, where logical reasoning forms a significant component. Through practice, one can improve their ability to navigate complex arguments, just like the one presented in this exercise.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

There is a widespread belief that people can predict impending earthquakes from unusual animal behavior. Skeptics claim that this belief is based on selective coincidence: people whose dogs behaved oddly just before an earthquake will be especially likely to remember that fact. At any given time, the skeptics say, some of the world's dogs will be behaving oddly. Clarification of which one of the following issues would be most important to an evaluation of the skeptics' position? (A) Which is larger, the number of skeptics or the number of people who believe that animal behavior can foreshadow earthquakes? (B) Are there means other than the observation of animal behavior that nonscientists can use to predict earthquakes? (C) Are there animals about whose behavior people know too little to be able to distinguish unusual from everyday behavior? (D) Are the sorts of behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes as pronounced in dogs as they are in other animals? (E) Is the animal behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes specific to impending earthquakes or can it be any kind of unusual behavior?

The cafeteria at Acme Company can offer only four main dishes at lunchtime, and the same four choices have been offered for years. Recently mushroom casserole was offered in place of one of the other main dishes for two days, during which more people chose mushroom casserole than any other main dish. Clearly, if the cafeteria wants to please its customers, mushroom casserole should replace one of the regular dishes as a permanent part of the menu. The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to consider (A) the proportion of Acme Company employees who regularly eat lunch in the company cafeteria (B) whether any of the ingredients used in the cafeteria's recipe for mushroom casserole are included in any of the regular main dishes (C) a desire for variety as a reason for people's choice of mushroom casserole during the days it was offered (D) what foods other than main dishes are regularly offered at lunchtime by the cafeteria (E) whether other meals besides lunch are served in the Acme Company cafeteria

Harry: Airlines have made it possible for anyone to travel around the world in much less time than was formerly possible. Judith: That is not true. Many flights are too expensive for all but the rich. Judith's response shows that she interprets Harry's statement to imply that (A) the majority of people are rich (B) everyone has an equal right to experience world travel (C) world travel is only possible via routes serviced by airlines (D) most forms of world travel are not affordable for most people (E) anyone can afford to travel long distances by air

The director of a secondary school where many students were having severe academic problems impaneled a committee to study the matter. The committee reported that these students were having academic problems because they spent large amounts of time on school sports and too little time studying. The director then prohibited all students who were having academic problems from taking part in sports in which they were active. He stated that this would ensure that such students would do well academically. The reasoning on which the director bases his statement is not sound because he fails to establish that (A) some students who spend time on sports do not have academic problems (B) all students who do well academically do so because of time saved by not participating in sports (C) at least some of the time the students will save by not participating in sports will be spent on solving their academic problems (D) no students who do well academically spend time on sports (E) the quality of the school's sports program would not suffer as a result of the ban

Sabina: The words used in expressing facts affect neither the facts nor the conclusions those facts will support. Moreover, if the words are clearly defined and consistently used, the actual words chosen make no difference to an argument's soundness. Thus, how an argument is expressed can have no bearing on whether it is a good argument. Emile: Badly chosen words can make even the soundest argument a poor one. After all, many words have social and political connotations that influence people's response to claims expressed in those words, regardless of how carefully and explicitly those words are defined. Since whether people will acknowledge a fact is affected by how the fact is expressed, the conclusions they actually draw are also affected. The point at issue between Emile and Sabina is whether (A) defining words in one way rather than another can alter either the facts or the conclusions the facts will justify (B) a word can be defined without taking into account its social and political connotations (C) a sound argument in support of a given conclusion is a better argument than any unsound argument for that same conclusion (D) it would be a good policy to avoid using words that are likely to lead people either to misunderstand the claims being made or to reason badly about those claims (E) a factor that affects neither the truth of an argument's premises nor the logical relation between its premises and its conclusion can cause an argument to be a bad one

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free