Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Elena: While I was at the dog show, every dog that growled at me was a white poodle, and every white poodle I saw growled at me. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Elena's statement? (A) The only white dogs that Elena saw at the dog show were poodles. (B) There were no gray poodles at the dog show. (C) At the dog show, no gray dogs growled at Elena. (D) All the white dogs that Elena saw growled at her. (E) Elena did not see any gray poodles at the dog show.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct answer is (D): All the white dogs that Elena saw growled at her.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Statements

First, identify the statements made by Elena: 1) Every dog that growled at her was a white poodle, and 2) Every white poodle she saw growled at her.
02

Analyze Statements

From the first statement, we can infer that all growling dogs were white poodles. The second statement indicates that every white poodle also exhibited the same behavior of growling.
03

Possible Inferences

Consider the possible inferences from the statements: - If every growling dog was a white poodle, then it's unknown if there were other non-growling white dogs. - If every white poodle growled, then no white poodles showed any different behavior.
04

Compare with Options

Compare Elena's statements with the given options: - (A) implies exclusivity which is not stated. - (B) makes assumptions beyond growling. - (C) lacks any link between gray dogs and growling behavior. - (D) directly aligns with the fact every white poodle growled. - (E) goes beyond provided information.
05

Reach Conclusion

Based on the alignment of statements and options, infer that option (D) is the most accurate reflection of the information given. Elena stated that all the white poodles growled at her, which implies all the white dogs (in context of poodles) growled as well.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

LSAT Preparation
Preparing for the LSAT is akin to training for a mental marathon. It requires a strong foundation in logic, analysis, and time management. Start your preparation by understanding the test format: it's a multiple-choice exam with sections that assess logical reasoning, analytical reasoning, and reading comprehension.

Here are some tips to enhance your LSAT preparation:
  • Regular Practice: Consistent practice using past LSAT exams helps familiarize you with the question types.
  • Focus on Weak Areas: Identify sections where you struggle and dedicate extra time to them.
  • Create a Study Schedule: A structured approach ensures that you cover all necessary material without cramming.
A strong LSAT preparation strategy not only improves your test scores but also builds skills that are crucial for law school and beyond.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis is a fundamental skill in reasoning and is critical for the LSAT and real-world decision-making. It involves breaking down arguments to evaluate their validity and soundness. Let's understand some key steps in argument analysis.

  • Identify Premises and Conclusions: Distinguish between the foundational claims (premises) and the main point (conclusion).
  • Look for Assumptions: These are unstated but necessary for the conclusion to follow from the premises.
  • Evaluate Evidence: Assess whether the premises logically support the conclusion.
Effective argument analysis trains you to recognize flaws in reasoning and strengthens your critical thinking capabilities.
Inference Skills
Developing strong inference skills is crucial for both the LSAT and logical reasoning. Inferences are conclusions drawn from evidence or reasoning. They're often essential for answering logic-based questions.

Here’s how you can hone your inference skills:
  • Practice Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: Deductive reasoning involves deriving specific conclusions from general rules. Inductive reasoning is about coming to general conclusions from specific examples.
  • Context Matters: Always consider the context from which the information is drawn to accurately infer.
  • Use Process of Elimination: By eliminating what cannot be true, you often land on what must be true.
Enhancing these skills ensures you make logical connections effortlessly, a key aspect of LSAT success and everyday decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 1990 major engine repairs were performed on 10 percent of the cars that had been built by the National Motor Company in the 1970 s and that were still registered. However, the corresponding figure for the cars that the National Motor Company had manufactured in the 1960 s was only five percent. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the discrepancy? (A) Government motor vehicle regulations generally require all cars, whether old or new, to be inspected for emission levels prior to registration. (B) Owners of new cars tend to drive their cars more carefully than do owners of old cars. (C) The older a car is, the more likely it is to be discarded for scrap rather than repaired when major engine work is needed to keep the car in operation. (D) The cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1970 s incorporated simplified engine designs that made the engines less complicated than those of earlier models. (E) Many of the repairs that were performed on the cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1960 s could have been avoided if periodic routine maintenance had been performed.

According to sources who can be expected to know, Dr. Maria Esposito is going to run in the mayoral election. But if Dr. Esposito runs, Jerome Krasman will certainly not run against her. Therefore Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate in the election. The flawed reasoning in the argument above most closely parallels that in which one of the following? (A) According to its management, Brown's Stores will move next year. Without Brown's being present, no new large store can be attracted to the downtown area. Therefore the downtown area will no longer be viable as a shopping district. (B) The press release says that the rock group Rollercoaster is playing a concert on Saturday. It won't be playing on Friday_if it plays on Saturday. So Saturday will be the only day this week on which Rollercoaster will perform. (C) Joshua says the interviewing panel was impressed by Marilyn. But if they were impressed by Marilyn, they probably thought less of Sven. Joshua is probably right, and so Sven will probably not get the job. (D) An informant says that Rustimann was involved in the bank robbery. If Rustimann was involved, Jones was certainly not involved. Since these two are the only people who could have been involved, Rustimann is the only person the police need to arrest. (E) The review said that this book is the best one for beginners at programming. If this book is the best, that other one can't be as good. So this one is the book we should buy.

Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and the lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain. The advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies? (A) It cites experimental evidence that subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences. (B) It ridicules people who do not subscribe to Stimulus by suggesting that they do not believe that exercise will improve brain capacity. (C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use. (D) It supports its recommendation by a careful analysis of the concept of exercise. (E) It implies that brains and muscle are similar in one respect because they are similar in another respect.

Most disposable plastic containers are now labeled with a code number (from 1 to 9 ) indicating the type or quality of the plastic. Plastics with the lowest code numbers are the easiest for recycling plants to recycle and are thus the most likely to be recycled after use rather than dumped in landfills. Plastics labeled with the highest numbers are only rarely recycled. Consumers can make a significant long-term reduction in the amount of waste that goes unrecycled, therefore by refusing to purchase those products packaged in plastic containers labeled with the highest code numbers. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion above? (A) The cost of collecting, sorting, and recycling discarded plastics is currently higher than the cost of manufacturing new plastics from virgin materials. (B) Many consumers are unaware of the codes that are stamped on the plastic containers. (C) A plastic container almost always has a higher code number after it is recycled than it had before recycling because the recycling process causes a degradation of the quality of the plastic. (D) Products packaged in plastics with the lowest code numbers are often more expensive than those packaged in the higher-numbered plastics. (E) Communities that collect all discarded plastic containers for potential recycling later dump in landfills plastics with higher-numbered codes only when it is clear that no recycler will take them.

The commercial news media emphasize exceptional events such as airplane crashes at the expense of those such as automobile accidents, which occur far more frequently and represent a far greater risk to the public. Yet the public tends to interpret the degree of emphasis the news media give to these occurrences as indicating the degree of risk they represent. If the statements above are true, which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them? (A) Print media, such as newspapers and magazines, are a better source of information than are broadcast media. (B) The emphasis given in the commercial news media to major catastrophes is dictated by the public's taste for the extraordinary. (C) Events over which people feel they have no control are generally perceived as more dangerous than those which people feel they can avert or avoid. (D) Where commercial news media constitute the dominant source of information, public perception of risk does not reflect actual risk. (E) A massive outbreak of cholera will be covered more extensively by the news media than will the occurrence of a rarer but less serious disease.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free