Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following studies would provide support for Rubinstein's claims? (A) a study that indicated that many members of the commercial elite in nineteenth-century London had insignificant holdings of real property (B) a study that indicated that, in the nineteenth century, industrialists from the north of England were in fact a target for working-class people (C) a study that indicated that, in nineteenth-century Britain, probate values of goods for sale were not as high as probate values of cash assets (D) a study that indicated that the wealth of nineteenth-century British industrialists did not appear to be significantly greater when the full value of their real property holdings was actually considered (E) a study that indicated that at least some members of the official governing elite in nineteenth-century Britain owned more real property than had previously been thought to be the case

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D best supports Rubinstein's claims by assessing real property impact on wealth perceptions.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Rubinstein's Claims

Begin by understanding what Rubinstein is claimed to have argued. Without detailed context, one can infer that Rubinstein's argument likely concerns the sources or amounts of wealth of certain groups or individuals in nineteenth-century Britain.
02

Analyze Each Study Option

Evaluate each study option and consider how it might support Rubinstein's claims. Each study presents a different scenario about wealth measurement or holdings of specific groups of people.
03

Evaluate Option A

Option A discusses the commercial elite of London with insignificant real property holdings. This could suggest they amassed wealth without large real estate, potentially supporting Rubinstein's claims if his argument involves misconceived wealth measurement.
04

Evaluate Option B

Option B talks about northern industrialists being a target for working-class people, which doesn't directly address wealth measurement or holdings.
05

Evaluate Option C

Option C mentions probate values of goods versus cash assets, which indirectly relates to asset valuation methods. This might support Rubinstein if he focused on asset undervaluation.
06

Evaluate Option D

Option D indicates that the real property sensibly accounted for doesn't show significantly greater wealth of industrialists. This suggests real estate was overshadowed by other wealth forms, aligning with a possible Rubinstein assertion.
07

Evaluate Option E

Option E discusses the underestimated real property of governing elites. This suggests elites had more wealth than assumed, which doesn't align with correcting underestimation, deviating from supporting Rubinstein.
08

Determine the Best Supporting Study

Among the options, Option D offers direct support to Rubinstein by addressing the real value consideration of industrialists' wealth, influencing how overall wealth assessments looked exaggerated without this factor.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Rubinstein's claims
Rubinstein's claims are central to understanding the question regarding wealth in nineteenth-century Britain. Though the original context of Rubinstein's arguments isn't provided, we can infer that he focuses on how wealth was perceived and measured during this period. He likely suggests that traditional wealth indicators, like real property, may have been overemphasized or misunderstood. This means that Rubinstein might be challenging the assumption that land ownership always equated to wealth. Instead, he could be arguing for a more nuanced examination of wealth beyond just property, such as through industrial or commercial gains.
  • Focus on traditional versus alternative wealth indicators.
  • Challenge to conventional land-based wealth perspective.
  • Potential for misunderstanding of actual wealth dynamics.
Understanding this helps us select studies that align with his perspective of how wealth was assessed, particularly those minimizing real property as a primary wealth indicator.
19th-century Britain
The historical backdrop of nineteenth-century Britain is crucial in framing Rubinstein's claims. This was an era marked by significant economic and social transitions. The Industrial Revolution was transforming the landscape, and wealth was no longer solely resting on land ownership Industrialists and traders, especially in burgeoning urban areas like Northern England and London, began to amass significant fortunes through manufacturing and commerce.
  • The shift from agrarian to industrial economy.
  • Rising prominence of cities and industrial hubs.
  • Changing perceptions and measurements of wealth.
These changes in the socio-economic environment possibly fuel Rubinstein's argument. It was a time when wealth was becoming increasingly diversified, challenging traditional measures that emphasized real property.
Wealth measurement
Wealth measurement in nineteenth-century Britain was undergoing a profound shift. Traditionally, wealth was often gauged by land and property ownership. However, with the industrial boom, this understanding was questioned. Rubinstein's claims may argue that wealth was not accurately represented if solely based on real property holdings.
  • Emergence of non-land-based wealth avenues.
  • Industrial and commercial assets gaining prominence.
  • Need for a broader wealth assessment framework.
This period saw the rise of cash assets, stocks, and industrial wealth, which were harder to trace using old methods. If real estate was previously seen as a yardstick of wealth, Rubinstein's focus might have been to highlight these new wealth forms that escaped traditional assessments.
Real property holdings
Real property holdings historically held significant weight in measuring one's wealth. In nineteenth-century Britain, it was often assumed that those with extensive land were wealthy. However, Rubinstein's claims challenge this notion, suggesting that factors other than real property could equally or more significantly represent wealth.
  • Historical significance of land as wealth indicator.
  • Changing dynamics with industrial growth.
  • Impact of overlooking non-real estate assets.
This concept is critical when analyzing Rubinstein’s perspective. The diminishing emphasis on land as definitive wealth underscores the importance of understanding wealth as a multifaceted concept, particularly in an era where industrialists were outpacing old money landowners in financial terms.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If all of the claims offered in support of the conclusion are accurate, each of the following could be true EXCEPT: (A) The interests of justice would have been better served if the police had released Peter Foster with a warning. (B) Alicia Green had never before driven a car belonging to someone else without first securing the owner's permission. (C) Peter Foster was hit by the taxi while he was running a red light, whereas Alicia Green drove with extra care to avoid drawing the attention of the police to the car she had taken. (D) Alicia Green barely missed hitting a pedestrian when she sped through a red light ten minutes before she was stopped by the police for driving a car that had defective taillights. (E) Peter Foster had been cited for speeding twice in the preceding month, whereas Alicia Green had never been cited for a traffic violation.

Eight years ago hunting was banned in Greenfield County on the grounds that hunting endangers public safety. Now the deer population in the county is six times what it was before the ban. Deer are invading residential areas, damaging property and causing motor vehicle accidents that result in serious injury to motorists. Since there were never any hunting-related injuries in the county, clearly the ban was not only unnecessary but has created a danger to public safety that would not otherwise exist. Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the conclusion above? (A) In surrounding counties, where hunting is permitted, the size of the deer population has not increased in the last eight years. (B) Motor vehicle accidents involving deer often result in damage to the vehicle, injury to the motorist, or both. (C) When deer populations increase beyond optimal size, disease and malnutrition become more widespread among the deer herds. (D) In residential areas in the county, many residents provide food and salt for deer. (E) Deer can cause extensive damage to ornamental shrubs and trees by chewing on twigs and saplings.

The author discusses the impact of gray marketing on goodwill in order to (A) fault trademark owners for their unwillingness to offer a solution to a major consumer complaint against gray marketing (B) indicate a way in which manufacturers sustain damage against which they ought to be protected (C) highlight one way in which gray marketing across markets is more problematic than gray marketing within a market (D) demonstrate that gray marketing does not always benefit the interests of unauthorized distributors (E) argue that consumers are unwilling to accept a reduction in price in exchange for elimination of service

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Academics respect only people who hold doctoral degrees. (B) All of this university's professors have obtained doctoral degrees. (C) At this university, every professor who holds a doctoral degree in computer science really knows about computers. (D) All academics who hold doctoral degrees are respected by their academic colleagues. (E) Among this university's staff members with doctoral degrees, only those in the computer science department really know about computers.

The cafeteria at Acme Company can offer only four main dishes at lunchtime, and the same four choices have been offered for years. Recently mushroom casserole was offered in place of one of the other main dishes for two days, during which more people chose mushroom casserole than any other main dish. Clearly, if the cafeteria wants to please its customers, mushroom casserole should replace one of the regular dishes as a permanent part of the menu. The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to consider (A) the proportion of Acme Company employees who regularly eat lunch in the company cafeteria (B) whether any of the ingredients used in the cafeteria's recipe for mushroom casserole are included in any of the regular main dishes (C) a desire for variety as a reason for people's choice of mushroom casserole during the days it was offered (D) what foods other than main dishes are regularly offered at lunchtime by the cafeteria (E) whether other meals besides lunch are served in the Acme Company cafeteria

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free