Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Despite a steady decrease in the average number of hours worked per person per week, the share of the population that reads a daily newspaper has declined greatly in the past 20 years. But the percentage of the population that watches television daily has shown a similarly dramatic increase over the same period. Clearly, increased television viewing has caused a simultaneous decline in newspaper reading. Which one of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the explanation given above for the decline in newspaper reading? (A) There has been a dramatic increase over the past 20 years in the percentage of people who tell polltakers that television is their primary source of information about current events. (B) Of those members of the population who do not watch television, the percentage who read a newspaper every day has also shown a dramatic decrease. (C) The time people spend with the books and newspapers they read has increased, on average, from 1 to 3 hours per week in the past 20 years. (D) People who spend large amounts of time each day watching television are less able to process and remember printed information than are those who do not watch television. (E) A typical television set is on 6 hours a day, down from an average of \(61 / 2\) hours a day 5 years ago.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option B is most damaging because it suggests factors other than TV affect newspaper readership.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Argument

The argument suggests that the rise in daily television viewing has caused the decline in daily newspaper reading. It implies a causal relationship between these two trends over the past 20 years.
02

Identifying the Critical Point

To weaken the claim that increased television viewing has led to a decline in newspaper reading, we need to provide evidence that the two trends are not causally linked.
03

Evaluating Each Option

We need to evaluate each option to determine which fact most strongly contradicts the proposed explanation of the decline in newspaper reading being caused by increased television viewing.
04

Analyzing Option A

Option A suggests an increase in the percentage of people who view television as their primary information source, which supports the argument that television is replacing newspapers.
05

Analyzing Option B

Option B states that even among those who do not watch television, the percentage reading newspapers daily has declined. This suggests that factors other than television viewing affect newspaper readership, challenging the argument's direct causal link.
06

Analyzing Option C

Option C indicates an increase in time spent on books and newspapers, hinting at a separate factor increasing engagement in reading materials, not weakening the argument about television's impact.
07

Analyzing Option D

Option D claims that heavy television watchers are less capable of processing printed information. While it associates TV watching with reading ability, it doesn't directly contradict the causation proposed in the argument.
08

Analyzing Option E

Option E notes a decrease in the average hours a TV is on, which does not connect directly to the argument about increasing daily viewing causing reduced newspaper readership.
09

Identifying the Most Damaging Fact

Since Option B highlights that newspaper readership has declined even among those who do not watch television, it directly undermines the argument that increased television watching is the cause of the decline in newspaper reading.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

causal reasoning
Causal reasoning is the process of identifying and understanding the cause-and-effect relationships between different events or variables. When we look at this problem, causal reasoning is used to assert a link between increased television viewing and decreased newspaper reading. The original argument infers that watching more TV causes people to read newspapers less.
However, such a causal claim can be overly simplistic. There are often multiple factors at play for any given effect, and correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation. For example, even if data shows that as TV watching goes up, newspaper reading goes down, they might both be caused by a third factor, such as changes in technology or lifestyle habits.
In our exercise, analyzing option B provides a scenario where both TV viewing and newspaper reading are affected not by each other but potentially by another unnoticed influence. By finding this, we challenge the supposed causal link, proving that understanding the real cause of changes often requires deeper investigation beyond surface observations.
argument evaluation
Argument evaluation is the skill of critically assessing the strength and validity of a given argument. It requires an understanding of whether the premises logically lead to the conclusion and whether evidence supports the argument’s claim. This involves looking for any assumptions that are being made without proof.
  • In our exercise, the initial argument is that the decline in newspaper reading is directly due to increased television watching.
  • The task is to evaluate this by checking if this reasoning holds up under scrutiny. Option B is particularly valuable for argument evaluation.
  • It suggests a decline in newspaper reading among those who do not watch TV, indicating the argument might be built on a weak premise that TV is the sole cause.
To effectively evaluate arguments, it’s crucial to look for alternate explanations and to ask whether other factors could account for the observed phenomena. Only then can one judge the argument's robustness and validity.
critical thinking
Critical thinking involves analyzing facts objectively, comprehending complex problems, and evaluating arguments to form a reasoned judgment. This skill helps identify biases, assumptions, and logical fallacies. It's essential when you need to decide on the most damaging counterpoint to a causative argument, like in the given exercise.

Critical thinking lets you dissect the structure of the argument. Before accepting the conclusion, ask questions such as:
  • Are there other plausible explanations?
  • Is the evidence sufficient and relevant?
  • Are any assumptions taken for granted?
By engaging in these questions, you would note that option B demonstrates that newspaper readership declined even among non-TV watchers, implying an alternative cause. In this problem, using critical thinking helps unravel complexity, providing clarity and offering deep insights that go beyond a surface-level interpretation. It shows that multiple causative factors likely exist, and one should explore these before concluding.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A large group of hyperactive children whose regular diets included food containing large amounts of additives was observed by researchers trained to assess the presence or absence of behavior problems. The children were then placed on a low-additive diet for several weeks, after which they were observed again. Originally nearly 60 percent of the children exhibited behavior problems; after the change in diet, only 30 percent did so. On the basis of these data, it can be concluded that food additives can contribute to behavior problems in hyperactive children. The evidence cited fails to establish the conclusion because (A) there is no evidence that the reduction in behavior problems was proportionate to the reduction in food-additive intake (B) there is no way to know what changes would have occurred without the change of diet, since only children who changed to a low-additive diet were studied (C) exactly how many children exhibited behavior problems after the change in diet cannot be determined, since the size of the group studied is not precisely given (D) there is no evidence that the behavior of some of the children was unaffected by additives (E) the evidence is consistent with the claim that some children exhibit more frequent behavior problems after being on the low-additive diet than they had exhibited when first observed

The author mentions that goodwill was probably excluded from the probate valuation of a business in nineteenth-century Britain most likely in order to (A) give an example of a business asset about which little was known in the nineteenth century (B) suggest that the probate valuations of certain businesses may have been significant underestimations of their true market value (C) make the point that this exclusion probably had an equal impact on the probate valuations of all nineteenth-century British businesses (D) indicate that expectations about future profit-making is the single most important factor in determining the market value of certain businesses (E) argue that the twentieth-century method of determining probate valuations of a business may be consistently superior to the nineteenth-century method

The author suggests that the total probate valuations of the personal property of individuals holding goods for sale in nineteenth-century Britain may have been (A) affected by the valuation conventions for such goods (B) less accurate than the valuations for such goods provided by income tax returns (C) less, on average, if such goods were tobacco-related than if they were alcohol-related (D) greater, on average, than the total probate valuations of those individuals who held bank balances (E) dependent on whether such goods were held by industrialists or by merchants or bankers

The cafeteria at Acme Company can offer only four main dishes at lunchtime, and the same four choices have been offered for years. Recently mushroom casserole was offered in place of one of the other main dishes for two days, during which more people chose mushroom casserole than any other main dish. Clearly, if the cafeteria wants to please its customers, mushroom casserole should replace one of the regular dishes as a permanent part of the menu. The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to consider (A) the proportion of Acme Company employees who regularly eat lunch in the company cafeteria (B) whether any of the ingredients used in the cafeteria's recipe for mushroom casserole are included in any of the regular main dishes (C) a desire for variety as a reason for people's choice of mushroom casserole during the days it was offered (D) what foods other than main dishes are regularly offered at lunchtime by the cafeteria (E) whether other meals besides lunch are served in the Acme Company cafeteria

Office manager: I will not order recycled paper for this office. Our letters to clients must make a good impression, so we cannot print them on inferior paper. Stationery supplier: Recycled paper is not necessarily inferior. In fact, from the beginning, the finest paper has been made of recycled material. It was only in the 1850 s that paper began to be made from wood fiber, and then only because there were no longer enough rags to meet the demand for paper. In which one of the following ways does the stationer's response fail to address the office manager's objection to recycled paper? (A) It does not recognize that the office manager's prejudice against recycled paper stems from ignorance. (B) It uses irrelevant facts to justify a claim about the quality of the disputed product. (C) It assumes that the office manager is concerned about environmental issues. (D) It presupposes that the office manager understands the basic technology of paper manufacturing. (E) It ignores the office manager's legitimate concern about quality.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free