Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chance discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research. Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research. (B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research. (C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer. (D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply. (E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument claims that because modern research is expensive and requires grant funding, scientists must focus strictly on projected outcomes to get funding. Consequently, they ignore unexpected findings, hindering serendipitous discoveries.
02

Identify the Conclusion

The conclusion of the argument is that serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery due to the current need for focused and projected research outcomes to secure funding.
03

Identify Assumptions

Assumptions are unstated premises that must hold true for the argument to be valid. Here, the argument relies on the assumption that only findings directly sought after in research can lead to a successful project, implying that unexpected findings are ignored.
04

Connect the Assumption to an Answer Choice

Review the answer choices to find one that supports the idea that unexpected findings (i.e., serendipity) are not pursued due to focused funding projections. Choice (A) mentions that only sought findings directly bear on research, which aligns with the assumption that serendipitous findings are ignored.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

scientific discovery
Scientific discovery refers to the process of exploring and understanding the natural world. It involves observation, experimentation, and analysis to uncover new facts or principles. Historically, scientific discovery has played a crucial role in advancing human knowledge and technology. Explorers of science strive to answer complex questions, solve real-world problems, and generally improve humanity's understanding of the universe.

Scientists rely on a combination of deliberate investigation and unexpected findings, known as serendipity, to make breakthroughs. Scientific research requires rigorous methodologies to ensure that results are reliable and valid. This systematic approach helps in verifying results through repeat experiments and peer review. Nonetheless, the heart of discovery often lies in the curiosity and perseverance of researchers dedicated to uncovering the unknown.

While serendipitous discoveries are sometimes stumbled upon unexpectedly, systematic research is vital for ongoing scientific progress. It serves as the foundation upon which scientists understand the known, thus making it easier to spot the unknown when they unintentionally encounter it.
research funding
Research funding is the financial support provided to conduct scientific investigations. It is a critical component of the scientific process, as it enables researchers to obtain necessary resources, such as equipment and personnel, to carry out their studies.

Funding usually comes from a variety of sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profit organizations. Each grant typically has specific requirements and expectations when it comes to the research outcomes.
  • Government funding often supports large-scale, long-term research projects that align with public interests.
  • Private companies might fund research that aligns with their commercial goals, often focusing on innovative technologies or healthcare solutions.
  • Non-profit organizations usually focus on research that has a societal impact, such as public health or environmental studies.

The dependency on research funding affects the direction of scientific inquiry, as researchers often tailor their proposals to align with the priorities of funding bodies. This focus can, at times, limit the scope of exploration, emphasizing outcomes that fit within predetermined expectations and potentially hindering unexpected findings from being pursued further.
serendipity in research
Serendipity in research refers to unexpected discoveries that arise during the pursuit of known objectives. These unforeseen findings can significantly impact scientific advancement, often leading to breakthroughs that weren't initially sought.

Famous instances of serendipity in research include the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming, who found the antibiotic properties of a mold by accident, and the creation of the microwave oven following Percy Spencer's experiments with radar technology.

Embracing serendipity requires an open-minded approach where researchers are curious and willing to explore unexpected results. It involves maintaining a flexible mindset to appreciate unanticipated data.
  • Paying attention to anomalies and outliers can lead to groundbreaking insights.
  • Allowing room in research agendas for unscripted exploration promotes innovation.

While current funding mechanisms often demand a focused approach to satisfy grant expectations, allowing space for serendipitous discoveries can enhance scientific research, fostering breakthroughs that might have otherwise been overlooked.
grant proposals
Grant proposals are formal submissions requesting financial support for research projects. These documents are crucial for acquiring research funding, as they outline a researcher's planned investigations and justify the resources needed.

A successful grant proposal typically includes:
  • A clear and compelling introduction that highlights the significance of the research problem.
  • Detailed methodology describing the approach, including any tools or techniques to be used.
  • Expected outcomes that align with the goals of the funding agency.
  • A budget breakdown to justify the funding request.
  • Background information demonstrating the researcher's qualifications and past achievements.

Writing an effective grant proposal requires aligning the research goals with the priorities of the funding body. Researchers need to demonstrate the potential impact of their work and convince funders of its value.

Grant proposals act as a double-edged sword in research; they are essential for securing necessary funds but can also constrain the creative flow of discovery by adhering strictly to predetermined outcomes. However, they remain an indispensable part of the academic and scientific ecosystems, facilitating the progression of numerous vital research projects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 1990 major engine repairs were performed on 10 percent of the cars that had been built by the National Motor Company in the 1970 s and that were still registered. However, the corresponding figure for the cars that the National Motor Company had manufactured in the 1960 s was only five percent. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the discrepancy? (A) Government motor vehicle regulations generally require all cars, whether old or new, to be inspected for emission levels prior to registration. (B) Owners of new cars tend to drive their cars more carefully than do owners of old cars. (C) The older a car is, the more likely it is to be discarded for scrap rather than repaired when major engine work is needed to keep the car in operation. (D) The cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1970 s incorporated simplified engine designs that made the engines less complicated than those of earlier models. (E) Many of the repairs that were performed on the cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1960 s could have been avoided if periodic routine maintenance had been performed.

There is a widespread belief that people can predict impending earthquakes from unusual animal behavior. Skeptics claim that this belief is based on selective coincidence: people whose dogs behaved oddly just before an earthquake will be especially likely to remember that fact. At any given time, the skeptics say, some of the world's dogs will be behaving oddly. Clarification of which one of the following issues would be most important to an evaluation of the skeptics' position? (A) Which is larger, the number of skeptics or the number of people who believe that animal behavior can foreshadow earthquakes? (B) Are there means other than the observation of animal behavior that nonscientists can use to predict earthquakes? (C) Are there animals about whose behavior people know too little to be able to distinguish unusual from everyday behavior? (D) Are the sorts of behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes as pronounced in dogs as they are in other animals? (E) Is the animal behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes specific to impending earthquakes or can it be any kind of unusual behavior?

According to sources who can be expected to know, Dr. Maria Esposito is going to run in the mayoral election. But if Dr. Esposito runs, Jerome Krasman will certainly not run against her. Therefore Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate in the election. The flawed reasoning in the argument above most closely parallels that in which one of the following? (A) According to its management, Brown's Stores will move next year. Without Brown's being present, no new large store can be attracted to the downtown area. Therefore the downtown area will no longer be viable as a shopping district. (B) The press release says that the rock group Rollercoaster is playing a concert on Saturday. It won't be playing on Friday_if it plays on Saturday. So Saturday will be the only day this week on which Rollercoaster will perform. (C) Joshua says the interviewing panel was impressed by Marilyn. But if they were impressed by Marilyn, they probably thought less of Sven. Joshua is probably right, and so Sven will probably not get the job. (D) An informant says that Rustimann was involved in the bank robbery. If Rustimann was involved, Jones was certainly not involved. Since these two are the only people who could have been involved, Rustimann is the only person the police need to arrest. (E) The review said that this book is the best one for beginners at programming. If this book is the best, that other one can't be as good. So this one is the book we should buy.

Nutritionists have recommended that people eat more fiber. Advertisements for a new fiber-supplement pill state only that it contains "44 percent fiber." The advertising claim is misleading in its selection of information on which to focus if which one of the following is true? (A) There are other products on the market that are advertised as providing fiber as a dietary supplement. (B) Nutritionists base their recommendation on medical findings that dietary fiber protects against some kinds of cancer. (C) It is possible to become addicted to some kinds of advertised pills, such as sleeping pills and painkillers. (D) The label of the advertised product recommends taking 3 pills every day. (E) The recommended daily intake of fiber is 20 to 30 grams, and the pill contains one-third gram.

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers have a lower conviction rate than those who rely on court-appointed public defenders. This explains why criminals who commit lucrative crimes like embezzlement or insider trading are more successful at avoiding conviction than are street criminals. The explanation offered above would be more persuasive if which one of the following were true? (A) Many street crimes, such as drug dealing, are extremely lucrative and those committing them can afford expensive private lawyers. (B) Most prosecutors are not competent to handle cases involving highly technical financial evidence and have more success in prosecuting cases of robbery or simple assault. (C) The number of criminals convicted of street crimes is far greater than the number of criminals convicted of embezzlement or insider trading. (D) The percentage of defendants who actually committed the crimes of which they are accused is no greater for publicly defended than for privately defended defendants. (E) Juries, out of sympathy for the victims of crimes, are much more likely to convict defendants accused of violent crimes than they are to convict defendants accused of "victimless" crimes or crimes against property.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free