Logout Open In App
Open In App
Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 4: Problem 4

Our tomato soup provides good nutrition: for instance, a warm bowl of it contains more units of vitamin \(C\) than does a serving of apricots or fresh carrots! The advertisement is misleading if which one of the following is true? (A) Few people depend exclusively on apricots and carrots to supply vitamin \(C\) to their diets. (B) A liquid can lose vitamins if it stands in contact with the air for a protracted period of time. (C) Tomato soup contains important nutrients other than vitamin \(C\). (D) The amount of vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) provided by a serving of the advertised soup is less than the amount furnished by a serving of fresh strawberries. (E) Apricots and fresh carrots are widely known to be nutritious, but their contribution consists primarily in providing a large amount of vita\(\min A\), not a large amount of vitamin \(C\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D makes the advertisement misleading by suggesting strawberry's higher vitamin C content.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Claim

The advertisement claims that a bowl of tomato soup contains more vitamin C than a serving of apricots or fresh carrots. To evaluate this claim, determine its criteria for being misleading.
02

Identifying Relevant Information

List all the answer options and analyze how each might reveal that the advertisement is misleading. Consider the nutritional context for each option.
03

Analyzing Each Option

Evaluate each option to see if it contradicts, modifies, or undermines the claim about vitamin C content: - Option A states few people rely solely on apricots and carrots for vitamin C, which does not dispute the comparison claim itself. - Option B mentions vitamin loss upon exposure to air, which might affect the soup's nutrient value but isn’t directly related to the comparative claim. - Option C presents the presence of multiple nutrients in the soup, irrelevant to the specific claim about vitamin C. - Option D suggests that the soup has less vitamin C than fresh strawberries, directly undermining its promotional claim if strawberries were an implied point of comparison. - Option E highlights the known contribution of apricots and carrots as vitamin A sources, not impacting the vitamin C comparison.
04

Choosing the Best Option

Identify which option most significantly exposes the claim as misleading. Option D stands out because it presents a direct comparison with strawberries, likely another common nutrient-rich food, suggesting the advertisement may ignore other relevant comparisons.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
When tackling LSAT problems, understanding logical reasoning is crucial. Logical reasoning involves evaluating arguments, identifying logical flaws, and determining conclusions from given statements. In this context, it allows you to critically assess an advertisement’s claim about nutritional benefits.

For example, the tomato soup ad asserts superiority over apricots and carrots based on vitamin C. Here, using logical reasoning, you question the basis of the claim:
  • Is the comparison valid?
  • What assumptions are being made?
  • Does the statement ignore other important comparisons?
Leveraging logical reasoning involves dissecting these elements to uncover how the advertisement could be misleading or incomplete. By spotting logical inconsistencies or oversights, you can engage in more effective critical analysis.
Advertisement Analysis
Analyzing advertisements involves understanding how they aim to persuade consumers. Advertisers often highlight a product’s strengths while downplaying or omitting weaknesses. In the case of the tomato soup ad, the aim is to emphasize its higher vitamin C content compared to apricots and carrots.

Here, advertisement analysis helps you see:
  • Which aspects of the product are highlighted?
  • What nutritional facts are presented and omitted?
  • Whether the comparison is relevant to the consumer.
By investigating these angles, advertisement analysis helps you determine whether the claim is complete or if it misleads consumers into believing the soup is the best option for vitamin C intake.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to objectively evaluate arguments and differentiate between valid conclusions and misleading statements. This skill is valuable when assessing advertisements like the tomato soup claim.

Through critical thinking, you learn to:
  • Question why specific comparisons are made.
  • Consider what information might be missing.
  • Identify any potential biases or assumptions.
Applying critical thinking to the soup advertisement involves questioning not just the information given, but also what isn’t mentioned. Why, for example, doesn’t the ad compare the soup to strawberries if they are known for their vitamin C? This approach enables you to form a deeper understanding of the advertisement’s purpose and possible flaws.
Nutritional Comparison
Nutritional comparison involves accurately assessing the nutritional value of different food items. Analysis isn’t just about quantity but also the quality and context of nutrients.

In this exercise:
  • The tomato soup's vitamin C content is compared to that of apricots and carrots.
  • Understanding that these fruits mainly provide vitamin A, not C, is crucial.
  • Identifying if higher-vitamin C foods, like strawberries, offer better comparisons.
Through nutritional comparison, you can interpret the real value the tomato soup provides. By acknowledging other nutritional sources, you ensure a comprehensive understanding of how food comparisons might mislead based on selective information.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When workers do not find their assignments challenging, they become bored and so achieve less than their abilities would allow. On the other hand, when workers find their assignments too difficult, they give up and so again achieve less than what they are capable of achieving. It is, therefore, clear that no worker's full potential will ever be realized. Which one of the following is an error of reasoning contained in the argument? (A) mistakenly equating what is actual and what is merely possible (B) assuming without warrant that a situation allows only two possibilities (C) relying on subjective rather than objective evidence (D) confusing the coincidence of two events with a causal relation between the two (E) depending on the ambiguous use of a key term

Eight years ago hunting was banned in Greenfield County on the grounds that hunting endangers public safety. Now the deer population in the county is six times what it was before the ban. Deer are invading residential areas, damaging property and causing motor vehicle accidents that result in serious injury to motorists. Since there were never any hunting-related injuries in the county, clearly the ban was not only unnecessary but has created a danger to public safety that would not otherwise exist. Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the conclusion above? (A) In surrounding counties, where hunting is permitted, the size of the deer population has not increased in the last eight years. (B) Motor vehicle accidents involving deer often result in damage to the vehicle, injury to the motorist, or both. (C) When deer populations increase beyond optimal size, disease and malnutrition become more widespread among the deer herds. (D) In residential areas in the county, many residents provide food and salt for deer. (E) Deer can cause extensive damage to ornamental shrubs and trees by chewing on twigs and saplings.

Since the introduction of the Impanian National Health scheme, Impanians (or their private insurance companies) have had to pay only for the more unusual and sophisticated medical procedures. When the scheme was introduced, it was hoped that private insurance to pay for these procedures would be available at modest cost, since the insurers would no longer be paying for the bulk of health care costs, as they had done previously. Paradoxically, however, the cost of private health insurance did not decrease but has instead increased dramatically in the years since the scheme's introduction. Which one of the following, if true, does most to explain the apparently paradoxical outcome? (A) The National Health scheme has greatly reduced the number of medical claims handled annually by Impania's private insurers, enabling these firms to reduce overhead costs substantially. (B) Before the National Health scheme was introduced, more than 80 percent of all Impanian medical costs were associated with procedures that are now covered by the scheme. (C) Impanians who previously were unable to afford regular medical treatment now use the National Health scheme, but the number of Impanians with private health insurance has not increased. (D) Impanians now buy private medical insurance only at times when they expect that they will need care of kinds not available in the National Health scheme. (E) The proportion of total expenditures within Impania that is spent on health care has declined since the introduction of the National Health scheme.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would determine that demolishing the houses was the right decision or instead would determine that the proposal advocated by the opponents of demolition should have been adopted? (A) When what to do about an abandoned neighborhood building is in dispute, the course of action that would result in the most housing for people who need it should be the one adopted unless the building is believed to pose a threat to neighborhood safety. (B) When there are two proposals for solving a neighborhood problem, and only one of them would preclude the possibility of trying the other approach if the first proves unsatisfactory, then the approach that does not foreclose the other possibility should be the one adopted. (C) If one of two proposals for renovating vacant neighborhood buildings requires government funding whereas the second does not, the second proposal should be the one adopted unless the necessary government funds have already been secured. (D) No plan for eliminating a neighborhood problem that requires demolishing basically sound houses should be carried out until all other possible alternatives have been thoroughly investigated. (E) No proposal for dealing with a threat to a neighborhood's safety should be adopted merely because a majority of the residents of that neighborhood prefer that proposal to a particular counterproposal.

Complaints that milk bottlers take enormous markups on the bottled milk sold to consumers are most likely to arise when least warranted by the actual spread between the price that bottlers pay for raw milk and the price at which they sell bottled milk. The complaints occur when the bottled-milk price rises, yet these price increases most often merely reflect the rising price of the raw milk that bottlers buy from dairy farmers. When the raw-milk price is rising, the bottlers' markups are actually smallest proportionate to the retail price. When the raw-milk price is falling, however, the markups are greatest. If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them? (A) Consumers pay more for bottled milk when raw-milk prices are falling than when these prices are rising. (B) Increases in dairy farmers' cost of producing milk are generally not passed on to consumers. (C) Milk bottlers take substantially greater markups on bottled milk when its price is low for an extended period than when it is high for an extended period. (D) Milk bottlers generally do not respond to a decrease in raw-milk prices by straightaway proportionately lowering the price of the bottled milk they sell. (E) Consumers tend to complain more about the price they pay for bottled milk when dairy farmers are earning their smallest profits.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

Essay Plan

Read Explanation

Phonology

Read Explanation

Language Acquisition

Read Explanation

Creative Writing

Read Explanation

Graphology

Read Explanation

Single Paragraph Essay

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free