Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author's argument regarding the true motivation for the passage of the Dawes Act? (A) The legislators who voted in favor of the Dawes Act owned land adjacent to Native American reservations. (B) The majority of Native Americans who were granted fee patents did not sell their land back to their tribes. (C) Native Americans managed to preserve their traditional culture even when they were geographically dispersed. (D) The legislators who voted in favor of the Dawes Act were heavily influenced by BIA bureaucrats. (E) Non-Native Americans who purchased the majority of Native American lands consolidated them into larger farm holdings.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (E) strengthens the author's argument by showing non-Native Americans gained financially.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The author's argument suggests that the true motivation for passing the Dawes Act was not to benefit Native Americans, but possibly to benefit other groups, such as land speculators or legislators. We need to identify additional evidence that supports this claim.
02

Analyze Each Option for Support of the Argument

Let's examine each option: - (A) If legislators owned land next to reservations, they might benefit from increased land value following the act. - (B) This doesn't appear to affect the intended benefit or provide ulterior motivations for the act's passage. - (C) Preservation of culture doesn't directly relate to the motivation behind the act. - (D) Influence by BIA bureaucrats may indicate an ulterior motive, especially if these bureaucrats benefited from the act. - (E) If non-Native Americans consolidated land holdings, it suggests the real beneficiaries of the act were not Native Americans but those who acquired and expanded these lands.
03

Evaluate the Best Strengthening Point

Options (A), (D), and (E) offer potential motives beyond the act's stated intention. However, option (E) directly indicates that the Dawes Act allowed non-Native Americans to acquire land, consolidating it into larger farms, thereby benefitting them financially. This aligns with the author's suggestion of ulterior economic motivations more clearly than the other options.
04

Select the Correct Answer

Based on the evaluation, option (E) best supports the author's argument that the Dawes Act's true motivation was to economically benefit non-Native Americans by enabling the consolidation of Native lands into larger holdings, contrary to benefitting Native Americans.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Dawes Act analysis
The Dawes Act, enacted in 1887, was a pivotal law in the history of Native American policy in the United States. The primary intention of the Dawes Act was to assimilate Native Americans into American society by allotting individual plots of land to them instead of communal tribal holdings. However, the effects and the motivations behind this Act are much debated. Many historians argue that it was driven more by the desires of landholders and speculators to gain access to tribal territories than to benefit Native Americans themselves.

In analyzing the Dawes Act, one must consider both the short and long-term impacts it had on Native communities. Initially, Native Americans were given parcels of land that often were not sufficient for sustaining their traditional agricultural practices, which disrupted their cultural lifestyles. Over time, the Act resulted in the loss of tribal land ownership as many Native Americans ended up selling their lands to non-Natives due to economic pressures.

The analysis reveals that the Dawes Act inadvertently—or perhaps intentionally—facilitated the transfer of indigenous land to non-Native hands, consolidating lands for larger economic gains of outside parties.
strengthening arguments
In the realm of critical reasoning, strengthening arguments involves providing additional information or evidence that bolsters the validity of a particular claim. With the context of the Dawes Act, the author's assertion is that the Act's real motive was the economic benefit of non-Native Americans rather than the purported support for Native American cultural adaptation.

Options provided like the ownership of bordering lands by legislators or outside influence from bureaucrats can serve to strengthen this argument. However, the most compelling evidence, in this case, is the option that shows a clear economic advantage for non-Native individuals or entities, such as the consolidation of lands into larger farm holdings by non-Natives indicated in option (E). This directly ties back to the argument that the actual beneficiaries of the Dawes Act were not the Native Americans themselves.

When evaluating how to strengthen an argument, consider the clarity and directness with which the supporting evidence ties back to the main claim. The more directly and undeniably the evidence supports the claim, the stronger the argument becomes.
legal reasoning skills
Developing keen legal reasoning skills is crucial when interpreting laws and their implications, such as with the Dawes Act. Legal reasoning involves analyzing the legislative context, recognizing the motivations behind a law, and evaluating its outcomes to determine if they align with the intended purpose. This skill requires a logical and methodical approach to dissecting legal texts and understanding policymakers' potential biases and hidden agendas.

In the case of the Dawes Act, legal reasoning involves questioning who truly benefited from the Act and why. Analyzing historical accounts, one might notice conflicting interests between publicly stated motives and the real legislative outcomes. Practicing legal reasoning means looking beyond the surface to assess who gains from such legislation and whether the results align with the purported goals.

The ability to use legal reasoning allows individuals to critically assess arguments like those around the Dawes Act, providing a more comprehensive understanding of law and its societal impacts.
author's argument evaluation
When evaluating the author's argument, especially regarding complex issues like the Dawes Act, it's important to critically assess the claims and underlying assumptions. The author's argument here posits that the Dawes Act had ulterior motives, namely economic gains for non-Native individuals rather than cultural assimilation assistance for Native Americans.

To evaluate this argument, consider the evidence presented and determine its relevance and adequacy in supporting the claim. Does the evidence show a consistent pattern of benefiting non-Natives? Are there other interpretations or counterarguments that need to be addressed?

Effective argument evaluation involves scrutinizing every piece of evidence critically, assessing its source, and ensuring it directly supports the main argument. Additionally, examining the broader context of the law and its historical implications can provide deeper insight into whether the author's stance holds validity against documented historical occurrences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eight years ago hunting was banned in Greenfield County on the grounds that hunting endangers public safety. Now the deer population in the county is six times what it was before the ban. Deer are invading residential areas, damaging property and causing motor vehicle accidents that result in serious injury to motorists. Since there were never any hunting-related injuries in the county, clearly the ban was not only unnecessary but has created a danger to public safety that would not otherwise exist. Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the conclusion above? (A) In surrounding counties, where hunting is permitted, the size of the deer population has not increased in the last eight years. (B) Motor vehicle accidents involving deer often result in damage to the vehicle, injury to the motorist, or both. (C) When deer populations increase beyond optimal size, disease and malnutrition become more widespread among the deer herds. (D) In residential areas in the county, many residents provide food and salt for deer. (E) Deer can cause extensive damage to ornamental shrubs and trees by chewing on twigs and saplings.

When workers do not find their assignments challenging, they become bored and so achieve less than their abilities would allow. On the other hand, when workers find their assignments too difficult, they give up and so again achieve less than what they are capable of achieving. It is, therefore, clear that no worker's full potential will ever be realized. Which one of the following is an error of reasoning contained in the argument? (A) mistakenly equating what is actual and what is merely possible (B) assuming without warrant that a situation allows only two possibilities (C) relying on subjective rather than objective evidence (D) confusing the coincidence of two events with a causal relation between the two (E) depending on the ambiguous use of a key term

Although all birds have feathers and all birds have wings, some birds do not fly. For example, penguins and ostriches use their wings to move in a different way from other birds. Penguins use their wings only to swim under water at high speeds. Ostriches use their wings only to run with the wind by lifting them as if they were sails. Which one of the following is most parallel in its reasoning to the argument above? (A) Ancient philosophers tried to explain not how the world functions but why it functions. In contrast, most contemporary biologists seek comprehensive theories of how organisms function, but many refuse to speculate about purpose. (B) Some chairs are used only as decorations, and other chairs are used only to tame lions. Therefore, not all chairs are used for sitting in spite of the fact that all chairs have a seat and some support such as legs. (C) Some musicians in a symphony orchestra play the violin, and others play the viola, but these are both in the same category of musical instruments, namely string instruments. (D) All cars have similar drive mechanisms, but some cars derive their power from solar energy, whereas others burn gasoline. Thus, solar-powered cars are less efficient than gasoline-powered ones. (E) Sailing ships move in a different way from steamships. Both sailing ships and steamships navigate over water, but only sailing ships use sails to move over the surface.

Of the following, which one would the author most likely say is the most troublesome barrier facing working parents with primary child-care responsibility? (A) the lack of full-time jobs open to women (B) the inflexibility of work schedules (C) the low wages of part-time employment (D) the limited advancement opportunities for nonprofessional employees (E) the practice of allocating responsibilities in the workplace on the basis of gender

Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and the lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain. The advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies? (A) It cites experimental evidence that subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences. (B) It ridicules people who do not subscribe to Stimulus by suggesting that they do not believe that exercise will improve brain capacity. (C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use. (D) It supports its recommendation by a careful analysis of the concept of exercise. (E) It implies that brains and muscle are similar in one respect because they are similar in another respect.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free