Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one of the following statements concerning the reason for the end of allotment, if true, would provide the most support for the author's view of politicians? (A) Politicians realized that allotment was damaging the Native American way of life. (B) Politicians decided that allotment would be more congruent with the Native American custom of communal land use. (C) Politicians believed that allotment's continuation would not enhance their opportunities to exercise patronage. (D) Politicians felt that the staff and budgets of the BIA had grown too large. (E) Politicians were concerned that too much Native American land was falling into the hands of non-Native Americans.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer is C.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Question

The question asks which statement, if true, would most support the author's view of politicians regarding the reason for the end of allotment policy concerning Native Americans. We need to find the option that aligns with a potential critical view of politicians.
02

Analyze Each Statement

Review each option to understand what belief about politicians it might reflect: A) Suggests empathy and concern for Native Americans. B) Indicates a cultural sensitivity towards Native practices. C) Implies self-interest and focus on political gain rather than the wellbeing of Native Americans. D) Suggests concern over government expenditure and size. E) Indicates altruistic concern for protecting Native American land ownership.
03

Identify the Critical View of Politicians

A critical view of politicians would suggest that their actions are driven more by self-interest and political gain rather than altruistic motives. Thus, we look for the statement that aligns with this viewpoint.
04

Select the Best Supporting Statement

Option C (Politicians believed that allotment's continuation would not enhance their opportunities to exercise patronage) aligns with a critical view, as it suggests that the decision to end allotment was made because it didn't serve politicians' self-interests rather than out of concern for the Native Americans.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is the ability to analyze a situation and draw a conclusion based on available information. When facing a question like the LSAT problem about politicians and the end of allotment, logical reasoning involves carefully considering each option and determining which one most supports the author's view.
Identifying key details in each statement helps. Weighing them against the core argument helps as well. Look for clues that indicate relationship or causality. Ask yourself:
  • Does the option address the "why" or "how" behind the action?
  • Is it based on the author's insinuations about politicians being self-serving?
Logical reasoning often requires disregarding sympathetic or seemingly noble motives if the core argument suggests cynicism. Practice this process to sharpen your ability for quick and accurate analysis.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking involves evaluating information meticulously to form a sound judgment, especially in situations where one must discern the truth amidst conflicting information. In the context of the exercise, it's about peeling back the layers of what each statement suggests about political motives.
Critical thinking means:
  • Recognizing biases in statements or arguments.
  • Identifying the underlying assumptions that guide political decisions—are they self-interested or altruistic?
  • Comparing the intent of each statement against what you know about political behavior.
This process allows one to challenge assumptions and find deeper meaning, especially when statements could easily appear valid or attractive at face value.
Decision Making
Decision making in terms of LSAT questions involves selecting the most logical conclusion from a set of options. The decision is informed by logical reasoning and critical thinking skills, ensuring the most probable or evidentially supported choice is made.
When analyzing which statement best supports the view of politicians:
  • Consider all the evidence provided in the options.
  • Use logical and critical thinking to narrow down choices to those that align with the author’s likely critical viewpoint.
  • Evaluate each option's implications and how they reinforce or detract from this view.
A strong decision-making approach demands both objectivity and creativity to ensure the chosen statement is not only appropriate but substantiates the intention behind the author's argument.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis is breaking down an argument into components to understand and evaluate it. For LSAT questions like this exercise, it means understanding both the explicit and implicit nuances in each statement about politicians.
  • Identify the main point or claim of the author's view about politicians.
  • Examine supporting details in the options: which features drive a political decision?
  • Determine how external factors might color politicians' motives—are these based on inherent benefits to themselves?
  • Evaluate against typical political behaviors suggested by history or common rhetoric.
Argument analysis is crucial for understanding the subtleties of political motivations and testing how well the statement supports the given view.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A large group of hyperactive children whose regular diets included food containing large amounts of additives was observed by researchers trained to assess the presence or absence of behavior problems. The children were then placed on a low-additive diet for several weeks, after which they were observed again. Originally nearly 60 percent of the children exhibited behavior problems; after the change in diet, only 30 percent did so. On the basis of these data, it can be concluded that food additives can contribute to behavior problems in hyperactive children. The evidence cited fails to establish the conclusion because (A) there is no evidence that the reduction in behavior problems was proportionate to the reduction in food-additive intake (B) there is no way to know what changes would have occurred without the change of diet, since only children who changed to a low-additive diet were studied (C) exactly how many children exhibited behavior problems after the change in diet cannot be determined, since the size of the group studied is not precisely given (D) there is no evidence that the behavior of some of the children was unaffected by additives (E) the evidence is consistent with the claim that some children exhibit more frequent behavior problems after being on the low-additive diet than they had exhibited when first observed

Complaints that milk bottlers take enormous markups on the bottled milk sold to consumers are most likely to arise when least warranted by the actual spread between the price that bottlers pay for raw milk and the price at which they sell bottled milk. The complaints occur when the bottled-milk price rises, yet these price increases most often merely reflect the rising price of the raw milk that bottlers buy from dairy farmers. When the raw-milk price is rising, the bottlers' markups are actually smallest proportionate to the retail price. When the raw-milk price is falling, however, the markups are greatest. If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them? (A) Consumers pay more for bottled milk when raw-milk prices are falling than when these prices are rising. (B) Increases in dairy farmers' cost of producing milk are generally not passed on to consumers. (C) Milk bottlers take substantially greater markups on bottled milk when its price is low for an extended period than when it is high for an extended period. (D) Milk bottlers generally do not respond to a decrease in raw-milk prices by straightaway proportionately lowering the price of the bottled milk they sell. (E) Consumers tend to complain more about the price they pay for bottled milk when dairy farmers are earning their smallest profits.

One sure way you can tell how quickly a new ideafor example, the idea of "privatization" - is taking hold among the population is to monitor how fast the word or words expressing that particular idea are passing into common usage. Professional opinions of whether or not words can indeed be said to have passed into common usage are available from dictionary editors, who are vitally concerned with this question. The method described above for determining how quickly a new idea is taking hold relies on which one of the following assumptions? (A) Dictionary editors are not professionally interested in words that are only rarely used. (B) Dictionary editors have exact numerical criteria for telling when a word has passed into common usage. (C) For a new idea to take hold, dictionary editors have to include the relevant word or words in their dictionaries. (D) As a word passes into common usage, its meaning does not undergo any severe distortions in the process. (E) Words denoting new ideas tend to be used before the ideas denoted are understood.

Scicatific research at a certain university was supported in part by an annual grant from a major foundation. When the university's physics department embarked on weapons-related research, the foundation, which has a purely humanitarian mission, threatened to cancel its grant. The university then promised that none of the foundation's money would be used for the weapons research, whereupon the foundation withdrew its threat, concluding that the weapons research would not benefit from the foundation's grant. Which one of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning underlying the foundation's conclusion? (A) It overlooks the possibility that the availability of the foundation's money for humanitarian uses will allow the university to redirect other funds from humanitarian uses to weapons research. (B) It overlooks the possibility that the physics department's weapons research is not the only one of the university's research activities with other than purely humanitarian purposes. (C) It overlooks the possibility that the university made its promise specifically in order to induce the foundation to withdraw its threat. (D) It confuses the intention of not using a sum of money for a particular purpose with the intention of not using that sum of money at all. (E) It assumes that if the means to achieve an objective are humanitarian in character, then the objective is also humanitarian in character.

Although all birds have feathers and all birds have wings, some birds do not fly. For example, penguins and ostriches use their wings to move in a different way from other birds. Penguins use their wings only to swim under water at high speeds. Ostriches use their wings only to run with the wind by lifting them as if they were sails. Which one of the following is most parallel in its reasoning to the argument above? (A) Ancient philosophers tried to explain not how the world functions but why it functions. In contrast, most contemporary biologists seek comprehensive theories of how organisms function, but many refuse to speculate about purpose. (B) Some chairs are used only as decorations, and other chairs are used only to tame lions. Therefore, not all chairs are used for sitting in spite of the fact that all chairs have a seat and some support such as legs. (C) Some musicians in a symphony orchestra play the violin, and others play the viola, but these are both in the same category of musical instruments, namely string instruments. (D) All cars have similar drive mechanisms, but some cars derive their power from solar energy, whereas others burn gasoline. Thus, solar-powered cars are less efficient than gasoline-powered ones. (E) Sailing ships move in a different way from steamships. Both sailing ships and steamships navigate over water, but only sailing ships use sails to move over the surface.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free