Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

There is a widespread belief that people can predict impending earthquakes from unusual animal behavior. Skeptics claim that this belief is based on selective coincidence: people whose dogs behaved oddly just before an earthquake will be especially likely to remember that fact. At any given time, the skeptics say, some of the world's doss will be behaving oddly. Clarification of which one of the following issues would be most important to an evaluation of the skeptics' position? (A) Which is larger, the number of skeptics or the number of people who believe that animal behavior can foreshadow earthquakes? (B) Are there means other than the observation of animal behavior that nonscientists can use to predict earthquakes? (C) Are there animals about whose behavior people know too little to be able to distinguish unusual from everyday behavior? (D) Are the sorts of behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes as pronounced in dogs as they are in other animals? (E) Is the animal behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes specific to impending earthquakes or can it be any kind of unusual behavior?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (E) is most important for evaluating the skeptics' position as it questions the specificity of animal behavior prediction.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Question Context

The problem involves examining skeptics' claims about animal behavior and earthquake prediction. Skeptics argue that people associate unusual animal behavior with impending earthquakes due to selective memory, not due to an actual predictive relationship.
02

Identify the Essential Issue

To evaluate skeptics' claims, we need to focus on the core of their argument. They assert that unusual behavior and earthquakes aren't causally linked but are coincidental. Therefore, it's crucial to assess whether animal behavior specifically predicts earthquakes or merely reflects random odd behavior.
03

Analyze Each Option

Option (A) is irrelevant as the number of skeptics or believers doesn't affect the validity of the claim. Option (B) is about alternative prediction methods, which doesn't directly address the skeptics' focus. Option (C) considers knowledge gaps about animal behavior, which isn't central to evaluating coincidence claims. Option (D) pertains to comparative behavior across animals, which isn't directly related to skeptics' argument about predicting earthquakes. Option (E) directly addresses whether behaviors are specifically predictive of earthquakes, which is critical for evaluating coincidence claims.
04

Selecting Best Option

Option (E) is critical to the skeptics' argument as it questions if unusual behaviors are genuinely predictive of earthquakes or if they represent general odd behaviors that could occur at any time, thus supporting the claim of selective coincidence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Animal Behavior
People have long observed animals, noticing they sometimes seem to act strangely before natural disasters like earthquakes. These behaviors can include:
  • Restlessness
  • Erratic movements
  • Vocalizations that differ from the norm
  • Sudden attempts to flee

These behaviors are often more pronounced in animals like dogs and cats, but even birds and insects exhibit unusual actions. Some people believe these actions suggest animals have some ability to predict earthquakes.
However, understanding whether these behaviors truly indicate an impending earthquake involves determining if they consistently occur right before such events. If the patterns are consistent, it could indicate animals sense certain environmental changes before humans do, potentially through heightened sensory perceptions.
So, careful observation and scientific methods are needed to better understand the true nature of this behavior.
Skeptics
Skeptics, on the other hand, approach the idea of animals predicting earthquakes with caution and doubt. They propose that these supposed predictive behaviors are not based on reliable evidence. Instead, they argue that:
  • The occurrence of unusual behaviors and earthquakes are coincidental.
  • People tend to remember instances that match their beliefs, known as confirmation bias.
  • The behaviors might simply happen randomly and are then retrospectively linked to earthquakes.

Skeptics assert that without clear, scientific evidence, claims about animal behavior before earthquakes should be viewed critically. They emphasize the importance of not jumping to conclusions based on anecdotal evidence or limited observations.
Selective Coincidence
The concept of selective coincidence plays a pivotal role in understanding why some people believe in animal predictions of earthquakes. Selective coincidence involves noticing and remembering only those events that appear to support a hypothesis, while ignoring non-confirming instances. For example:
  • If an earthquake happens and a pet behaved oddly, the owner may remember and link the two events.
  • If the pet behaved oddly but no earthquake occurred, this is less likely to be remembered.
  • This results in skewed perceptions, where people believe a stronger relationship exists than is justified by actual evidence.

Selective coincidence can thus lead to misconceptions and highlight the need for accurate data analysis to genuinely determine if such a relationship truly exists.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is essential when evaluating claims about earthquake prediction through animal behavior. This involves:
  • Questioning initial assumptions about animal behavior and predictions.
  • Analyzing patterns through objective data.
  • Recognizing cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and selective memory.
  • Demanding rigorous scientific evidence before accepting claims.

Critical thinking encourages us not to accept claims at face value but to explore the evidence supporting or refuting them. By applying critical thinking, one can better differentiate between coincidence and meaningful patterns, ensuring a more grounded understanding of whether animal behavior can truly predict earthquakes or not.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verbally harassed his roommate, has erred by penalizing the student for doing what he surely has a right to do: speak his mind! Dean of students: But what you're saying is that our university should endorse verbal harassment. Yet surely if we did that, we would threaten the free flow of ideas that is the essence of university life. Which one of the following is a questionable technique that the dean of students uses in attempting to refute the student representative? (A) challenging the student representative's knowledge of the process by which the student was expelled (B) invoking a fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior (C) misdescribing the student representative's position, thereby making it easier to challenge (D) questioning the motives of the student representative rather than offering reasons for the conclusion defended (E) relying on a position of power to silence the opposing viewpoint with a threat

The commercial news media emphasize exceptional events such as airplane crashes at the expense of those such as automobile accidents, which occur far more frequently and represent a far greater risk to the public. Yet the public tends to interpret the degree of emphasis the news media give to these occurrences as indicating the degree of risk they represent. If the statements above are true, which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them? (A) Print media, such as newspapers and magazines, are a better source of information than are broadcast media. (B) The emphasis given in the commercial news media to major catastrophes is dictated by the public's taste for the extraordinary. (C) Events over which people feel they have no control are generally perceived as more dangerous than those which people feel they can avert or avoid. (D) Where commercial news media constitute the dominant source of information, public perception of risk does not reflect actual risk. (E) A massive outbreak of cholera will be covered more extensively by the news media than will the occurrence of a rarer but less serious disease.

The critic's response to the historian is flawed because it (A) produces evidence that is consistent with there not having been any timber trade between Poran and Nayal during the third Nayalese dynasty (B) cites current laws without indicating whether the laws cited are relevant to the timber trade (C) fails to recognize that the historian's conclusion was based on indirect evidence rather than direct evidence (D) takes no account of the difference between a law's enactment at a particular time and a law's existence as part of a legal code at a particular time (E) accepts without question the assumption about the purpose of laws that underlies the historian's argument

Some legislators refuse to commit public funds for new scientific research if they cannot be assured that the research will contribute to the public welfare. Such a position ignores the lessons of experience. Many important contributions to the public welfare that resulted from scientific research were never predicted as potential outcomes of that research. Suppose that a scientist in the early twentieth century had applied for public funds to study molds: who would have predicted that such research would lead to the discovery of antibiotics - one of the greatest contributions ever made to the public welfare? Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the argument? (A) The committal of public funds for new scientific research will ensure that the public welfare will be enhanced. (B) If it were possible to predict the general outcome of a new scientific research effort, then legislators would not refuse to commit public funds for that effort. (C) Scientific discoveries that have contributed to the public welfare would have occurred sooner if public funds had been committed to the research that generated those discoveries. (D) In order to ensure that scientific research is directed toward contributing to the public welfare, legislators must commit public funds to new scientific research. (E) Lack of guarantees that new scientific research will contribute to the public welfare is not sufficient reason for legislators to refuse to commit public funds to new scientific research.

Police statistics have shown that automobile antitheft devices reduce the risk of car theft, but a statistical study of automobile theft by the automobile insurance industry claims that cars equipped with antitheft devices are, paradoxically, more likely to be stolen than cars that are not so equipped. Which one of the following. if true, does the most to resolve the apparent paradox? (A) Owners of stolen cars almost invariably report the theft immediately to the police but tend to delay notifying their insurance company, in the hope that the vehicle will be recovered. (B) Most cars that are stolen are not equipped with antitheft devices, and most cars that are equipped with antitheft devices are not stolen. (C) The most common automobile antitheft devices are audible alarms, which typically produce ten false alarms for every actual attempted theft. (D) Automobile owners who have particularly theft-prone cars and live in areas of greatest incidence of car theft are those who are most likely to have antitheft devices installed. (E) Most automobile thefts are the work of professional thieves against whose efforts antitheft devices offer scant protection.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free